<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Security</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16/9/feed</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Chinese credibility on hacker training action - remember age of gymnasts in Olympics?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57387</link>
 <description>Actions taken publicly by the Chinese government may not always be taken at face value.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57387#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57387 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>certifications</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57388</link>
 <description>I&#039;m certified, and I&#039;m an idiot.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57388#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57388 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco Captures Two Leaders Magic Quadrants in Security</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57385</link>
 <description>Gartner has recognized Cisco&#039;s SSLVPN and Secure Web Gateway solutions as leaders in their respective technology. To this end, Gartner has positioned Cisco into the coveted leaders Magic Quadrant for each technology. These two categories arguably have the most industry buzz of all security technologies making this achievement even more prestigious right now. The Gartner magic quadrants are frequently...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57385#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25677">cisco gartner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6948">Cisco Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/19327">cisco sslvpn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25682">cisco wsa</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25679">gartner magic quadrant secure web gateway</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25678">gartner magic quadrant sslvpn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25683">gartner security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4620">Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4641">Jamey Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25681">secure web gateway gartner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25680">sslvpn gartner</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jheary</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57385 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Oracle&#039;s &quot;roadmap&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57367</link>
 <description>Sun IDM has one of the largest install bases of IDM in the world.  The fact that Oracle assumes that current customers are going to simply roll over and convert to OIM makes my blood boil.  I hope all current Sun IDM customers realize that while Oracle may be able to come up with a migration &#039;tool&#039;, it will be for the DB and OOTB code.  All workflows and forms will need to be re-worked.  Sun IDM is too customized for a cookie cutter migration tool.  Oracle had so many options, like turning Sun IDM over to the public like Solaris and OpenSSO. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57367&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57367#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tdubois65</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57367 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bitlocker can also use a 256-bit key length</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57380</link>
 <description>&quot;BitLocker uses Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) as its encryption algorithm with configurable key lengths of 128 or 256 bits, as well as an optional Diffuser. The default encryption setting is AES-128 with Diffuser, but the options are configurable by using Group Policy.&quot;

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee449438(WS.10).aspx#BKMK_Form</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57380#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57380 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;focus on people and process&quot; - correct but also would need focus on software design! Rugged coding is very difficult, sometimes</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57348</link>
 <description>&quot;focus on people and process&quot; - correct but also would need focus on software design! Rugged coding is very difficult, sometimes almost impossible, when the design works against it!

Anyway, a great idea, good luck - just hope it gets going against &quot;agile&quot; and other fast profit ideas! Unfortunately after 40 years &quot;rugged&quot; software design I have seen the skills almost disappear on coder level (sorry, did mean on developer? level). &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57348&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57348#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tuomoks</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57348 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft fixes 26 security holes, warns on unpatched multi-vendor SSL vulnerability</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57359</link>
 <description>As expected, today&#039;s Patch Tuesday is a doozie. Microsoft  released 13  bulletins to fix  26 vulnerabilities in Windows and Microsoft Office. This includes the first Hyper-V-specific patch. But wait, there&#039;s more.  Microsoft also issued a security advisory (977377) over  a publicly-known  vulnerability in the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer  (SSL) protocols. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57359#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4769">Microsoft security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14943">Microsoft Security alert</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1478">Patch Tuesday</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/451">SSL</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57359 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Adobe</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57323</link>
 <description>Apologies are all well and good. The most important thing is that fix!</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57323#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57323 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>61 CCIEs dropped out of Cisco&#039;s highly coveted cert program over the last 30 days</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57310</link>
 <description>According to Dual CCIE #18532 R&amp;S/Security - George Morton:

&quot;Over the last 30 days we have seen CCIEs drop their highly coveted certifications at a much greater rate than net new CCIEs. 

&quot;61 CCIEs dropped out of Cisco&#039;s prestigious certification program during the month of January 2010 alone.

&quot;For further clarification, let&#039;s do the math together: Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57310#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/154">Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25666">CCIEs held by Cisco in suspended status are included in Cisco&amp;#039;s worldwide CCIE count</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25668">December 2009 vs. January 2010 Worldwide CCIE Count Comparison</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25667">Inactive status CCIEs are not included in Cisco&amp;#039;s worldwide CCIE count</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25669">Increase in New CCIEs by Country</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25670">Increase in New CCIEs by Region</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/23525">View more CCIE Water Cooler Gossip</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brad Reese</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57310 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>good article, but...</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57291</link>
 <description>...what is SIEM?</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57291#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57291 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>US National Climate Service to monitor world of climate change</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57287</link>
 <description>After almost a year or so of wrangling, the US government today said it wants to set up a National Climate Service that is designed to meet the burgeoning demand for climate information.  Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57287#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/154">Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25665">climate  change</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1064">NASA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2126">NOAA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25664">US Commerce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/893">weather</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Layer 8</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57287 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Too many Security Certs</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57286</link>
 <description>I have mixed feelings about the security certifications argument.  In my experience it depends on where you live and work.  I currently live in the Minneapolis area and the large majority of job descriptions merely state that CISSP or other security certifications “Certification preferred, but not required”.  However, most people I know are required to after some time on the job to acquire the proper certs.  Now, in the D.C. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57286&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57286#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>wrap2tyt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57286 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Firefox updates</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57259</link>
 <description>The concluding sentence in the article states:
&quot;The genuine install site for Firefox updates can be found here.&quot;  The last two words link to Mozilla Europe [ http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/firefox/ ].</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57259#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cxroberts</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57259 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Research in Motion comments on this article</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57262</link>
 <description>Research in Motion, the maker of BlackBerry, provided Network World with the following commentary on the related article:

&quot;As a point of clarification to the article entitled &#039;BlackBerry spyware source code released,&#039; please note the following fact which is highly relevant for your readers in understanding the risk of spyware. Applications containing spyware cannot be installed on the Blackberry smartphone without the user&#039;s explicit consent unless of course someone else gains physical possession of the user&#039;s device along with knowledge of any enabled password. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57262&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57262#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57262 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Curious why Mozilla doesn&#039;t use free Virustotal.com?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57227</link>
 <description>Because detecting or not detecting in VirusTotal, means nothing.
http://blog.trendmicro.com/on-the-trustworthiness-of-the-av-industry-and-av-tests/</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57227#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57227 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>pluto</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57209</link>
 <description>could you make it more acurit</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57209#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57209 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yet more reasons to use Linux</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57191</link>
 <description>Rather than a reason to &quot;get the newest (MS) operating system&quot; this seems to me like more proof of the superiority of the Open Source method vs. the proprietary course. And yes, I do mean in business, not just at home. I only have Windows computers because I have to know how to fix the virus/spyware/trojan riddled systems. Linux? No such problem, far more secure, far fewer holes in security. Therefore, less downtime and less security and maintenance cost. 

But hey, stick with your M$ if you really think it&#039;s better. Not me.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57191#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Billbeau</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57191 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>western union hacking tool</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57184</link>
 <description>WESTERN UNION MTCN GRABBER 

WESTERN UNION MTCN GRABBER POPUPLARLY KNOWN AS WESTERN UNION BUG IS A SOFTWARE WRITTEN IN PHP THAT HACKS AND CRACKS THE WESTERN UNION MTCN PAYMENT DETAILS BEEN SENT TO ANY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD USING MYSQL7.1 DATABASE INJECTION PROTOCOL.THE INTERESTING FEATURE ABOUT THE SOFTWARE IS THAT IT ENABLES YOU TO RE-EDIT RECIEVERS INFORMATION TO ANY NAME OF YOUR CHOICE,THAT IS WHY IT IS CALLED A BUG.YOU AS WELL MAKE TRANSFER WITH IT USING THE WESTERN UNION VIRTUAL GOLD CARD.ALSO AVAILABLE IS BANK LOGINS AND TRANSFERS FOR US AND UK BANKS.

CHAT ID:WUATMBUG@YAHOO.COM
PHONE:+23 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57184&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57184#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57184 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Cyber Warfare is sublethal, but only for now&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57189</link>
 <description>Not true.  Cyber warfare can definitely be lethal, especially if targeted at sophisticated automated medication handling systems in a networked healthcare environment.  The author is insufficiently informed on this point.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57189#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57189 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IE flaw that lets remote hackers read your hard drive is extra bad for XP users</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57152</link>
 <description>On Wednesday a security researcher demonstrated a flaw in Internet Explorer at the Black Hat DC conference that could allow a hacker to remotely read files on the victim&#039;s local drive. The demonstration prompted a security advisory from Microsoft.  Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57152#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15797">browser security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25640">IE Protected Mode</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/92">Internet Explorer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4769">Microsoft security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14943">Microsoft Security alert</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57152 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
