<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Security</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Welcome Mac People....</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47443</link>
 <description>Welcome Mac People, slowly but surely your becoming a target in the world of computers. :)  </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47443#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Blue1978</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47443 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bad def of Rickrolling</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47441</link>
 <description>&quot;Rickrolling&quot; is generally the act of tricking someone into watching the music video of the song you mentioned, not viewing a picture of the singer. Still, you are correct that this is most likely a reference to rickrolling.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47441#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47441 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pathetic</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47438</link>
 <description>This is your guide to Mac Security ? Retards...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47438#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47438 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Junk Anyway</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47401</link>
 <description>When we tested MARS out in the begining it was junk and still is - at least Cisco made one good decision with this.

Never was able to get just raw syslog out without jumping through hoops.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47401#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47401 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FAA streamlines experimental space flight access</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47392</link>
 <description>The Federal Aviation Administration today said it would streamline the environmental review part of permit applications for the launch and/or reentry of reusable suborbital rockets to help bolster a fledgling commercial space market.  Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47392#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/23550">commercial space</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3745">faa</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1064">NASA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2394">space</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Layer 8</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47392 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Spec Sheet</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47336</link>
 <description>It looks like Sonicwall updated their spec sheet.  They list the TZ200 &quot;Stateful Throughput&quot; at 100 Mbps and the TZ210 at 200 Mbps. This is asumming Stateful Throughput is what you&#039;re referring to as &quot;typical internet performance.&quot;

</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47336#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>infotech2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47336 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Air Force: US decades behind on satellite protection</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47330</link>
 <description>Too little is known about what potential foes have placed into space and how much space debris is threatening to damage American orbiters. And the US needs to deploy more space sensors, satellites and satellite protection and quickly: &quot;We are decades behind where we should be, in my view.&quot;  Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47330#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2240">DARPA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24724">General Chilton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3801">satellites</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6898">US Air Force</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Layer 8</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47330 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>symantec rides apple malware hype</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47323</link>
 <description>They simply want to profit from the Mac malware drama.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47323#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47323 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco has a non-denial comment!</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47319</link>
 <description>Are they really getting out of the 3rd party support or not? The CISCO answer was certainly evasive.  I wonder if he moonlights as a Congressman or Senator?</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47319#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47319 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>National Cyber Security Prevention</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47315</link>
 <description>Unless they bring someone of Ms. Melissa Hathaway&#039;s credentials back in, we are doomed! It&#039;s my own personal belief that it has been downhill at even a faster rate since she departed. It&#039;s time to have accountability without K Street and Senators that have false alligiences.. Yet we continue to work the system as we do have a solution that our Goliath&#039;s cannot offer. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47315&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47315#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47315 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Airborne lasers make high-speed military network zip</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47307</link>
 <description>Ultra-high bandwidth lasers in manned or unmanned aircraft could soon be blasting military voice, video and data across the skies and to the ground if a hybrid optical laser system currently undergoing test pans out.  Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47307#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2240">DARPA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24720">optical lasers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6898">US Air Force</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Layer 8</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47307 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Can we block all IPv6 tunnels in our enterprise network?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47270</link>
 <description>A major IPv4 to IPv6 transition technique is the use of tunnels; this is encapsulating IPv6 packets into IPv4 packets that can then be transported over the IPv4-only parts of the Internet. Those tunnels can also be used within the enterprise network either on purpose (for example to traverse some legacy network devices not supporting IPv6) or not on purpose...
 Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47270#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/154">Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5589">ACL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/905">IPv6</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22521">teredo</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17004">tunnel</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Vyncke</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47270 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco computer game lets you play CEO</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47225</link>
 <description>If you want to be a CEO but not have any of the real responsibilities of one, you could try to play a new online game being offered by Cisco.  The company this week posted myPlanNet, a computer game that lets anyone be a broadband executive making network deployment decisions.  Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47225#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/154">Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/33">E-commerce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3240">ceo</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4117">computer games</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24701">myPlanNet</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Layer 8</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47225 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FCC and DOT team-up, want high-tech cure for distracted driving </title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47208</link>
 <description>The Federal Communications Commission and the US Department of Transportation are teaming up to develop what they called high-tech solutions to the growing problem of distracted or inattentive drivers.  Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47208#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/33">E-commerce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24698">auto technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/23226">distracted driving</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3436">dot</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/145">FCC</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Layer 8</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47208 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thoughts about Friday&#039;s security review</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47189</link>
 <description>Food for thought</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47189#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47189 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Can you review Savant Protection next round?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47183</link>
 <description>Another whitelisting vendor worth looking into is Savant Protection, out of Hudson, New Hampshire: http://www.savantprotection.com/</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47183#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>vcruz911</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47183 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IAM Cost Jusification</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47148</link>
 <description>Dave, I don’t agree with Perkins that &quot;We need to accept the fact that IAM is not a clearly defined, well-bounded set of applications and services that lend themselves easily or conveniently to a traditional justification model.”  Firstly we do need to show that IAM is clearly defined (it is) and easily justified (some of it is). &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47148&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47148#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47148 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>too many typos or a poorly worded article</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47124</link>
 <description>see subject</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47124#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47124 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yawn...Marketing</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47122</link>
 <description>Getting tired of the media hype. Let&#039;s see some high profile customers talk about Palo Alto. </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47122#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47122 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Contradicts the spirit of open source</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47123</link>
 <description>Anyone else see the humor in that Centrify is pushing a proprietary solution to a solution which is marketed as an open source solution. 

Likewise Open has some faults but at least it has a free open source solution. </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47123#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47123 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
