<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iSCSI</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1753</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Slow Decline</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30430</link>
 <description>It&#039;s too bad that Dell will likely kill the innovative R&amp;D and development that makes the EqualLogic product unique. The company has never successfully acquired a company (reminder: Alienware is an arms-length acquisition that Dell left alone). We&#039;ve already seen the best and brightest at EqualLogic leave the company and everyone knows Dell can&#039;t retain any good talent (especially in the storage industry). So for a longer term investment, I would actually look to NetApp as I know they will have consistent product families and upgrades in the future. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30430&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30430#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/285">Dell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1753">iSCSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1931">SANS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1504">storage</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:45:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30430 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Equalogic</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27014</link>
 <description>I hope Dell Equalogic can come out 10 Gigabit Ethernet iSCSI Storage.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27014#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/285">Dell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1753">iSCSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1504">storage</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:19:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27014 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FCoE</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24715</link>
 <description>First, I would like to thank Douglas Gourlay for responding to my post at http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24657/177203#comment-177203. You can find his home page at Cisco http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/ in his role as Senior Director of Marketing and Product Development for Cisco Data Centre. 

All that Fibrechannel and FCOE adds to a data centre is more complexity, and more organisational pain. &#039;Operational Orchestration&#039; does not occur. Fibrechannel enables the Server and Networking teams to balkanize and does not create synergy. Worse, it creates an opportunity to have a dialog about my FC is better than your IP. 
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24715&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24715#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1754">Fibre Channel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1753">iSCSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9009">Nexus</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:40:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>lineecho</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24715 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: iSCSI breezes into SMB businesses</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22860</link>
 <description>With the announcement of Dell&#039;s intent to purchase EqualLogic, iSCSI is at the forefront of storage news conversation. The Dell/EqualLogic acquisition further validates the iSCSI SAN market, to be sure, but it was already picking up steam and there are already thousands of IT organizations - both large and small - that rely on iSCSI as a core element of their storage infrastructure.   Many of these organizations have chosen a different approach to implementing iSCSI, which I would like to explore a bit below.
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22860&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22860#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1753">iSCSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1504">storage</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:18:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22860 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Vendor unveils iSCSI storage for SMBs</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20645</link>
 <description>Any update on Equallogic&#039;s solution? Looking at your highlighted vendors (Dell and HP) they do both FC and ISCSI. I think Equallogic is ISCSI only vendor.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20645#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1753">iSCSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1504">storage</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:35:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20645 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Securing Block Storage for the Long Haul</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12695</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I love talking about security. I get to put on my black trench coat and my black fedora, and then soon after I open my mouth a piano falls on my head. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mark from the Security Consortium took time to write me over the weekend:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hi Bill, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With the multitude of threats facing IP based protocols and what seem to be multiple protocol solutions in the SAN space, how much impact do you think RFC 3723 is going to have on SAN security in the short term and in the long term?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-m&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hi Mark, &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12695&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12695#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/84">Outsourcing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2105">FCIP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2106">iFCP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1753">iSCSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2103">spy vs. spy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/61">Storage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1504">storage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/31">Wide Area Networks</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:12:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bill Williams</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">12695 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bing!</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12505</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I’m home for a few days, my brackets are done, and before I jump right back into PowerPoint Hell, I want to answer a couple of questions that came in while I was out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ned Ryerson from Punxsutawney, PA writes: “Do you believe that 10G-bit Ethernet (and iSCSI) will replace Fibre Channel as the basis for storage infrastructures? Bing!” &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12505&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12505#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/605">data center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2008">data storage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1754">Fibre Channel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/316">funny</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1394">Ground Hog Day</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1753">iSCSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/61">Storage</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:13:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bill Williams</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">12505 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>iSCSI easier than Fibre Channel? Hah!</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12073</link>
 <description> &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12073&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12073#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1754">Fibre Channel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1753">iSCSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/61">Storage</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 07:54:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nixxfu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">12073 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
