<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>EU</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>EU investigating Google/Yahoo deal too</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32734</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Why should &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32556&quot;&gt;U.S. regulators&lt;/a&gt; have all the fun? The European Union (EU)&lt;img style=&quot;width: 82px; height: 79px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/regulatory.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;82&quot; height=&quot;79&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; confirmed that it too is investigating the upcoming Google/Yahoo ad deal to discern if it stifles competition in the European Economic Area, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/sep/16/google.yahoo&quot;&gt;this guardian.co.uk story&lt;/a&gt;. While Google claims the EU has no cause for concern, especially since the deal covers only Yahoo sites in the U.S. and Canada, the EU move can&#039;t be good news for Google. As others in the past (Microsoft) have found, EU regulatory scrutiny is plain bad for business. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32734&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32734#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15553">ad deal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16052">European Union</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13374">investigation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16053">online ad sales</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/146">regulatory</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/124">Yahoo</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:06:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Google Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32734 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google grudgingly makes data policy change</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32441</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Bowing to pressure from European Union regulators, Google announced that it would anonymize IP addresses on its server logs after 9 months, effectively halving the amount of data it kept under its previous 18-month retention policy. In the &lt;a href=&quot;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/another-step-to-protect-user-privacy.html&quot;&gt;blog announcing the change&lt;/a&gt;, however, Google complained that the data reduction could affect its ability to provide quality searches, as well as to innovate and prevent fraud. Still, Google says it&#039;s agreed to make the change to alleviate privacy qualms, especially those voiced by the EU, even though it will provide only &quot;incremental privacy benefits to users.&quot; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32441&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32441#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15867">18 months</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15868">9 months</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11729">data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1876">fraud</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/66">privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:08:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Google Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32441 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Polish watchdog asks the EU to investagate Microsoft for anti-trust</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31340</link>
 <description>A watchdog organization in Poland  has reportedly asked the EU&amp;#39;s European Commission to investigate&lt;img src=&quot;/Micronet%20images/scrutiny.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;55&quot; height=&quot;55&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; Microsoft over its dealings with laptop makers in the region, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idINLL63872620080821?rpc=44&quot;&gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wbj.pl/article-42243-microsoft-again-under-attack.html?typ=wbj&quot;&gt;Warsaw Business Journal&lt;/a&gt; report. The organization had been conducting an investigation over whether Microsoft was colluding  with laptop makers to restrict the availability of Linux as an operating system choice. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31340&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31340#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5268">antitrust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9773">European Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13068">Microsoft anti-trust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14853">Poland asks EC to investigate Microsoft</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:09:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31340 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft removed interoperability documents, Feds accuse</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29217</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The court-mandated committee that is overseeing Microsoft&amp;#39;s compliance with its   federal antitrust settlement said that&lt;img src=&quot;/Micronet%20images/documents.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;documents&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;63&quot; height=&quot;63&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; Microsoft has deleted some key information from its previously published protocols and is breaking its word in the process. So says &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/operatingsystems/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208800293&quot;&gt;a story in InformationWeek.&lt;/a&gt; Microsoft apparently deleted some data on  its Windows protocols  from its published  technical documentation that others  use   to write Windows software, according to a report filed last week by the Technical Committee overseeing antitrust compliance. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29217&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29217#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5268">antitrust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13159">Microsoft interopability</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13160">Microsoft protocols</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13161">Windows interoperability</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:29:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29217 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft to add support for ODF and PDF in Office</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28024</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Don&amp;#39;t you just want to roll your eyes? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28024&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28024#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12242">EC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9773">European Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6517">Microsoft Office 2007</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1279">ODF</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12243">ODF support in Microsoft Office</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4673">OOXML</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/411">PDF</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:22:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28024 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft to EU: Please forget about the $1.3 billion fine</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27658</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft, don&amp;#39;t hold your breath that the EU will pat you on the shoulder and &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/25466&quot;&gt;forgive the $1.3 fine&lt;/a&gt;  it imposed in February.&lt;img src=&quot;/Micronet images/eu flag.png&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;83&quot; height=&quot;56&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; It is good for all concerned (including Microsoft itself, your customers and your stock holders), that you have arrived at the modern age and  &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/25305&quot;&gt;published the  protocols&lt;/a&gt; for Windows, Office and other applications. This allows Windows to remain viable -- to be a target for   open source developers wanting to create great new apps for it, instead of being slowly replaced by Linux (which might still happen). &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27658&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27658#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5268">antitrust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11904">fines</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:39:15 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27658 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Another huge thump on the head from the EU?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26969</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Granted, Microsoft is a ruthless competitor, and the &lt;a href=&quot;/community/taxonomy/term/2148/all&quot;&gt;EU&amp;#39;s hard-handed approach&lt;/a&gt;has been generally a good thing -- forcing Microsoft to open itself up, which in the long run will be good for everyone, even Microsoft. But it will be interesting to see if the anti-Microsoft forces in Europe can get Microsoft excluded from EU gov&amp;#39;t contracts because of the company&amp;#39;s antitrust violations.&lt;/p&gt; Given the enormity of the software that would become off limits to EU IT departments, that would not be a good move for anyone. &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Go to &lt;a href=&quot;/subnets/microsoft/&quot;&gt;the Microsoft Subnet home page for more news, blogs, opinion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26969#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5440">anti-trust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5268">antitrust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:19:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26969 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EU study highlights weaknesses in regulatory approach to solving cyber crime</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25926</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Security news hound &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/10/security_economics/&quot;&gt;John Leyden&lt;/a&gt;  has identified a new EU study that is supposed to be about  the economics of cyber crime. The 114 page &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.enisa.europa.eu/doc/pdf/report_sec_econ_&amp;amp;_int_mark_20080131.pdf&quot;&gt;report&lt;/a&gt;  sponsored by ENISA (European Network and Information Security Agency) is mostly about finding new regulations that could improve security by requiring ISPs to police traffic and hosts as well as create new data disclosure requirements.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ENISA is soliciting comments on the report &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.enisa.europa.eu/pages/analys_barr_incent_for_nis_20080306.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; .  My own submitted comments I have reproduced below. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25926&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25926#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10291">cyber crime</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10292">ENISA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:11:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>stiennon</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">25926 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EU fines Microsoft $1.3B for antitrust abuse</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25466</link>
 <description>In the continuing saga between Microsoft and the European Commission, the commission fined Microsoft 899 million Euros, about 1.3 billion dollars on Wednesday for what the competition commissioner called continued failure to honor a 2004 antitrust ruling.
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;embed src=&quot;http://services.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/1243511167&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#FFFFFF&quot; flashVars=&quot;videoId=1435493304&amp;playerId=1243511167&amp;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://services.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&amp;servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&amp;cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&amp;domain=embed&amp;autoStart=false&amp;&quot; base=&quot;http://admin.brightcove.com&quot; name=&quot;flashObj&quot; width=&quot;470&quot; height=&quot;398&quot; seamlesstabbing=&quot;false&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; swLiveConnect=&quot;true&quot; pluginspage=&quot;http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25466&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25466#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5268">antitrust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9773">European Commission</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:33:36 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>videonet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">25466 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EU: We&#039;re A Kinder, More Open Microsoft</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25305</link>
 <description>It&amp;#39;s pretty clear what Microsoft&amp;#39;s intentions are behind opening up the trade  secret kimono to give us a look at product interoperability protocols, data APIs and &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/25154&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;document file formats&lt;/a&gt;. We&amp;#39;re nice guys now, EU... See? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25305&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25305#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1972">interoperability</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1048">Open Source Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/368">Ray Ozzie</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/99">Steve Ballmer</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:55:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">25305 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft&#039;s OOXML tactics come under EU scrutiny</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24855</link>
 <description>The number of probes the European Union has launched investigating Microsoft has increased to three, the Wall Street &lt;img src=&quot;/Micronet%20images/scrutiny.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;88&quot; height=&quot;88&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; Journal reported on Friday. The EU began an investigation into Microsoft&amp;#39;s activities over its attempt to get Office Open XML adopted as an International Standards Organization (ISO) standard. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24855&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24855#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5133">ISO vote</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4674">Office Open XML</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4673">OOXML</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:48:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24855 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Samba&#039;s Nose Allowed Under Microsoft Tent</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23257</link>
 <description>If you&amp;#39;ve worked with Linux in a Microsoft shop, you&amp;#39;ve probably used the  open source Samba server software at some point in time. Samba is an extremely  useful Linux server tool that eases the integration and communications with  Windows operating system hosts. But it&amp;#39;s become increasingly difficult for Samba  to support Windows Server protocols leaving few options for maintaining support  with new Windows based products. &lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSL207546720071220?pageNumber=1&amp;amp;virtualBrandChannel=0&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;EU ruling against Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;  is attempting to fix that. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23257&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23257#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8190">Samba server</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3752">Windows Server</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:40:06 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23257 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft and AntiTrust</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20074</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;On September 17, 2007, the European Court of First Instance (the second-highest court in Europe) rejected Microsoft&amp;#39;s attempt to overturn a landmark European Commission 2004 antitrust ruling and record fine. Not only is this a blow to Microsoft, but it also is not good news to several other U.S. tech giants that have run afoul of E.U. regulators in recent years. Intel is being investigated for the way it prices its computer chips, Apple&amp;#39;s pricing of music downloads is under scrutiny, and Google&amp;#39;s planned buyout of advertising giant DoubleClick has raised concerns over the search giant&amp;#39;s ability to set ad rates in the digital world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#39;s take a quick look at the Microsoft and the antitrust cases in the EU. There were two issues / rulings: &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20074&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20074#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5268">antitrust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3524">doj</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 03:31:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kerrie Meyler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20074 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EU official: Microsoft&#039;s behavior &#039;unacceptable&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12772</link>
 <description> &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12772&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12772#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2148">EU</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:05:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">12772 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
