<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>IPS</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Security as a network function, not such a good idea </title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/35346</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A researcher says product tests &lt;img src=&quot;/Micronet%20images/bottleneck.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;66&quot; height=&quot;64&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;indicate &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/111708-cisco-sec.html&quot;&gt;that adding security functions into your Cisco network can kill network performance&lt;/a&gt;. NSS Labs will publish its findings about firewalls, IPS and UTM early next year, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://nsslabs.com/&quot;&gt;NSS Labs&lt;/a&gt; CEO Vik Phatak says there are clearly performance drawbacks to using the Cisco security functions in routers and switches.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/35346&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/35346#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6948">Cisco Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17758">NSS Labs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/802">UTM</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:34:51 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35346 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No surprise</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/35101</link>
 <description>Of course the IPS people are going to say DOS attacks are on the rise. They want to sell more devices and convince people that they can&#039;t manage their networks without them! Strong access control, configuration management, proper firewall set-up and baseline awareness of what &quot;should be&quot; on the network are great practices that can be done WITHOUT having to burn cash on an IPS. It&#039;s easier to know what you should have than to constantly try to hunt down what shouldn&#039;t be there. That&#039;s why it&#039;s called &quot;management!&quot;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/35101#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:21:41 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Schratboy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35101 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NAC not IPS</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/34663</link>
 <description>That&#039;s what I was blogging about Tim - the NAC appliance McAfee announced they would ship in Q1 2009.

Clearly they couldn&#039;t build an IPS product from the assets of Lockdown because Lockdown didn&#039;t have an IPS.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/34663#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/760">NAC</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:45:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>toddhooper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">34663 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Good Review</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30690</link>
 <description>I too was impressed with interface on IPS-1. It&#039;s nice to see Check Point moving back into the IDS/IPS arena. </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30690#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/227">firewalls</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:17:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30690 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco security under attack at Black Hat/DefCon</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30623</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Security in Cisco gear will be under scrunity next week as security researchers put Cisco security through &lt;img style=&quot;width: 100px; height: 79px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/lock-key.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;79&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;its paces at Black Hat/DefCon. WLAN IPS vendor AirTight Networks will show how  it&amp;#39;s possible with some implementations of 802.11w in vendor equipment to conjure up an attack that hits WLAN access points with malformed packets, not bringing them down but triggering a disconnection response in their WLAN clients, &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/073108-black-hat.html&quot;&gt;writes Ellen Messmer in Network World&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30623&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30623#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/127">Black Hat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6201">Cisco IOS Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6948">Cisco Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/128">Defcon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:27:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30623 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco IPS vulnerability patched today</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29038</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Cisco Security &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a00809b3842.shtml&quot;&gt;released a patch today &lt;/a&gt;that fixes a vulnerability in its Intrusion Prevention System. &lt;img style=&quot;width: 47px; height: 47px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/2008/sec-tools-E-100x100.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;security&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;47&quot; height=&quot;47&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;Cisco says that its IPSs &amp;quot;that have gigabit network interfaces installed and are deployed in inline mode contain a denial of service vulnerability in the handling of jumbo Ethernet frames. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29038&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29038#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5950">cisco ips</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6948">Cisco Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12962">intrusion prevention systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:17:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29038 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ease of Use comes in Cisco&#039;s IPS 6.1 release.  Should Cisco competitors be afraid?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27548</link>
 <description>Cisco released the IPS 6.1 minor release upgrade early last week.   It sports a newly minted GUI manager/monitor and has a couple new features worth noting.  The new GUI manager/monitor called IPS Manager Express (IME) is leaps above the previous GUI.
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27548&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27548#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/33">E-commerce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5950">cisco ips</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4620">Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7246">intrusion prevention</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11798">ips 6.1</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11799">IPS security logging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4641">Jamey Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:34:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jheary</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27548 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco security gear + reputation services = good thing</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27147</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Scott Weiss is right when he says that adding reputation to Cisco&amp;#39;s security gear is important. And Cisco is right about giving over control of its classic &lt;img style=&quot;width: 71px; height: 72px&quot; src=&quot;/Micronet%20images/security-lock.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;71&quot; height=&quot;72&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;security gear - firewalls, VPNs, IPSes - to Weiss, who was brought into Cisco about a year ago when Cisco bought Ironport. Now Weiss says he wants to cross-pollenate engineers from his former company and Cisco&amp;#39;s security engineers to see what they can come up with. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27147&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27147#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1259">IronPort</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10846">reputation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11347">Scott Weiss</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11348">Secure Computing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/452">VPNs</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:46:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27147 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Big-Time Wireless Security - As a Service</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26755</link>
 <description>It&amp;#39;s hard not to recommend some form of IDS/IPS in any enterprise-class WLAN installation. But there&amp;#39;s usually some pushback when it comes to the price of this capability; after all, we&amp;#39;re installing sensors and servers and software and the cost can add up quickly. Some organizations thus (foolishly, I believe) forgo having a suitable IDS/IPS installed. I&amp;#39;m personally so concerned about WLAN security that I have a small-business-class IDS/IPS system installed in my office, protecting all of six APs. &lt;p&gt;On the other hand - and hearing about this was a smack-myself-in-the-forehead moment - why not provision IDS/IPS as a &lt;em&gt;service&lt;/em&gt;, effectively leasing the infrastructure and offering the rest as a managed service? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26755&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26755#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11035">AirTight</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1525">IDS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/754">SaaS</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:16:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Craig Mathias</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26755 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is the CCSP Cert worth it?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26435</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So is it worth all that time you would have to put in to get the CCSP? For those of you who are just joining me you haven&#039;t missed much. This happens to be my first of a month long session of Blogging here at NWW. When I decided to do this I has to choose something that I felt would be relevant to you. I decided to stick with what I&#039;m good at and focus in the realm of security, and since i&#039;ve been training folks for the last 7 years on how to use the PIX, ASA, IPS, Cisco Routers, and AAA I decided to stick with that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So to start out, I want to throw the ball into your hands. Do you think its worth it? There are a number of tests you can take. SND, SNRS, IPS, and SNPA are the core but what about CANAC, MARS, HIPS? I&#039;d like to know if you see a benefit in getting certified. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26435&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26435#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/154">Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1918">ASA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6461">CIsco ASA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6201">Cisco IOS Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/227">firewalls</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1101">IOS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3004">network security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2673">pix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:09:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>brandon</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26435 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Sourcefire boasts strong IPS management toolset</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24216</link>
 <description>I find it peculiar that the author is putting an IPS product and a Firewall under the same umbrella. The fact that both products are capable of blocking traffic doesn&#039;t make them the same group. Same as in Math, two objects that shares the same property doesn&#039;t necessary make them belong to the same group. The Author missed the entire point in this case.

Knowing the product the Author of this article had tested - what policy did the author deploy? was it the default policy? no modifications? what, one size fits all??

Did the author tried to change the policy? I did on that product and I block 95% of the attacks right of the bat leaving me 5% making up in writing my own snort rules.
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24216&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24216#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/227">firewalls</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7246">intrusion prevention</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8899">Sourcefire</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:55:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>alvarius</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24216 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco Releases New 4Gbps IPS 4270 Appliance</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22686</link>
 <description>Cisco has finally entering the high speed IPS market segment!  Cisco’s is shipping the IPS 4270 IPS Appliance which can deliver up to 4Gbps of real-world media-rich traffic inspection.  Cisco is proud of the fact that this benchmark number was achieved with the Cisco recommended IPS protection settings enabled on the 4270.  They used real-world, stateful traffic flows in their testing.  Cisco has not released the best case, pie in the sky, UDP performance numbers of the 4270 yet.  But it has released expected real-world performance numbers if you deploy the 4270 in a highly transactional environment like e-commerce or IP Voice.  This type of environment will drop performance down to 2Gbps of IPS inspection.  
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22686&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22686#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5950">cisco ips</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7792">datacenter security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4620">Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1525">IDS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4641">Jamey Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 12:29:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jheary</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22686 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IPS (intrusion-prevention system)</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21862</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An intrusion-prevention system (IPS) is an inline security device that performs deep-packet inspection to identify and block malicious traffic. IPSs are considered an improvement over intrusion-detection systems (IDS), which are passive devices that simply identify an attack but take no action to block it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IPSs are designed to respond in real time to attacks by dropping packets deemed malicious. IPSs are designed to block application-layer attacks, all the way up to Layer 7.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BlackICE from NetworkICE is considered the first commercial IPS. It was launched in 1998. NetworkICE was purchased in 2000 by Internet Security Systems, which is now part of IBM. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21862&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21862#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5513">0-9</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7246">intrusion prevention</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:25:38 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Inbox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21862 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Security Collaboration:  Cisco IPS and Cisco Wireless</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/19956</link>
 <description>Not many people realize that the Cisco IPS 4200 Series sensors can collaborate with a Cisco Wireless LAN Controller(WLC) to defend the network.  This solution allows you to extend your security protection way beyond what the embedded wireless signatures can offer.  It moves your wireless attack detection/prevention capabilities from the solely Layer 2 realm, that embedded wireless signatures offer, into the Layer 2-7 realm.  And since Layer 2-7 protection is arguably where you want/need to be this solution gets you there.  
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/19956&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/19956#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5950">cisco ips</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4641">Jamey Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5952">self defending network</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:30:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jheary</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19956 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New IOS Router security feature dynamically defends against day zero attacks</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18507</link>
 <description>Automatic Signature Extraction (ASE) is a new feature in IOS release 12.4(15)T1 that is designed to find and stop worms and viruses on the network, day zero.  To quote from one of the ASE developers Tin Yen, “the ASE feature is configured in the network to extract content specific signatures (often referred to as “patterns”) to help identify fast spreading worms and viruses by leveraging advanced deep packet inspection techniques”.
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18507&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18507#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4923">day zero</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4620">Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1101">IOS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2083">router</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:32:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jheary</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">18507 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco 8Gbps IPS solution for the Datacenter</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18384</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Deploying an IPS solution in a datacenter can be a tricky affair.  If not deployed properly, an IPS solution can severely affect the resiliency, performance, and security of a datacenter.  Cisco’s IPS solution has been extensively tested to make sure it meets the stringent requirements of today’s complex datacenter (DC) environments.    Cisco’s IPS solution is highly available, fast (8gbps), and scalable.  It’s ability to complement, rather than clash, with a datacenter designed around Cisco’s routing and switching best practices makes it unique in the industry.  Let’s take an in-depth look at this solution.  First let’s start with a model Cisco Approved datacenter architecture, based on Cisco’s best practices. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18384&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18384#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4826">datacenter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4620">Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:18:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jheary</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">18384 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CPI Solutions has achieved Cisco&#039;s advanced security specialization, do enterprise customers value it?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12750</link>
 <description>&lt;table width=&quot;460&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td  valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpisolutions.com/about.asp&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/arnie-friedman.jpg&quot; width=&quot;260&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; hspace=&quot;10&quot; height=&quot;367&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Arnie Friedman&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&quot;CPI has offered security consulting in some way, shape or form for approximately 10 years. There is no more profound need amongst companies today. The quality and availability of their data relies on it.&quot;

&quot;We find &lt;a href=&quot;#SUITE&quot;&gt;Cisco’s suite&lt;/a&gt; of security technologies to be the most complete and comprehensive in the industry. Becoming a Cisco Advanced Security Partner greatly enhances our knowledge base while positioning us as one of the leading security partners in California.&quot;

&quot;Security concerns will become even more dramatic in the years to come. Planting the seeds and beginning the implementation of protective measure today will go along way towards corporate comfort in the future,&quot; said &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpisolutions.com/about.asp&quot;&gt;Arnie Friedman&lt;/a&gt;, president and founder of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpisolutions.com/&quot;&gt;CPI Solutions&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

CPI is one of only twenty-nine Cisco partners in the United States to have both Silver Partner status and the Advanced Security Specialization.
&lt;a name=&quot;SUITE&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpisolutions.com/services_solutions/security_disaster_prevention.asp&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/cpi-solutions-network-world.gif&quot; width=&quot;460&quot; height=&quot;78&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Cisco Systems Awards Advanced Security Specialization to CPI Solutions&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt; 

To attain the specialization, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpisolutions.com/services_solutions/default.asp&quot;&gt;CPI Solutions&lt;/a&gt; had to focus on the entire suite of Cisco security products, including:
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps5057/index.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cisco Security Agent (CSA)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;

&lt;li&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6241/index.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cisco Security Monitoring, Analysis, and Response System (MARS)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;

&lt;li&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns466/networking_solutions_package.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Network Admission Control (NAC)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;

&lt;li&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6634/products_ios_protocol_group_home.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cisco IOS Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;

&lt;li&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6128/index.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cisco Clean Access (NAC Appliance)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;table width=&quot;460&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td  valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpisolutions.com/news_events/press_releases/10_10_06_growing_tech.asp&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/deloitte-fast-50-la-2006.gif&quot; width=&quot;203&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;10&quot; height=&quot;62&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;2006 Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Los Angeles&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Acknowledged by Deloitte &amp; Touche as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpisolutions.com/news_events/press_releases/10_10_06_growing_tech.asp&quot;&gt;18th fastest-growing&lt;/a&gt; technology company in the Los Angeles area, CPI continues to add to its consulting staff at a rapid clip.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpisolutions.com/&quot;&gt;CPI Network Solutions&lt;/a&gt; also achieved Cisco&#039;s VPN Security Specialization and Cisco&#039;s Advanced Unified Communications Specialization.

Most important of all, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpisolutions.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;CPI Solutions&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has been recognized with highest distinction for achieving &lt;b&gt;Cisco Customer Satisfaction Excellence&lt;/b&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/pr11/pr20/partners_customer_satisfaction_concept_home.html&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/cpi-customer-satisfaction.jpg&quot; width=&quot;460&quot; height=&quot;274&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;CPI Network Solutions is recognized with highest distinction in achieving Cisco Customer Satisfaction Excellence&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

If one were to use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpisolutions.com/&quot;&gt;CPI Solutions&lt;/a&gt; as an example, it certainly appears that advanced Cisco specialization and superb Cisco customer satisfaction go hand-in-hand.

But I still feel compelled to ask, do enterprise customers value Cisco&#039;s advanced security specialization?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/brad-reese.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/brad-signature.gif&quot; width=&quot;111&quot; height=&quot;47&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Brad Reese Profile&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.BradReese.Com/&quot;&gt;http://www.BradReese.Com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12750&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12750#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/154">Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2139">Advanced Security Specialization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2134">Cisco Security Agent</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1895">Cisco Silver Partner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1562">cisco systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2137">CPI Solutions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2135">CSA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2140">Internet infrastructure company</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2131">MARS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/760">NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2133">NAC Appliance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2132">Net</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2138">Southern California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/31">Wide Area Networks</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:58:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brad Reese</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">12750 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hyping IPS to death</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/3230</link>
 <description>Over at the Esphion blog, Juergen reports that &lt;a href=&quot;http://esphion.blogs.com/esphion/2005/09/rescuing_the_ip.html&quot;&gt;more and more customers are pulling money out of IPS projects&lt;/a&gt; and putting them into other security efforts, such as network behavior anomaly protection. Darn vendors, he says:

&lt;blockquote&gt;... These are good devices, which really work. The problem is that claims for their capabilities have been blown out of proportion. Therefore, customer expectations have been elevated to levels, which the technology cannot meet in the real world. ...&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/3230&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/3230#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/227">firewalls</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/226">IPS</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:41:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Gaffin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3230 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
