<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Data Center</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>did compellent bid?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47538</link>
 <description>Since compellent is always talking about how they beat emc I wonder if they big on this? I would say not since they have made it clear to all partners they dont bid on any rfp unless they have been told up front they will win. </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47538#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47538 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Please do it now!</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47527</link>
 <description>It would be great if Murdoch Google access to News Corps content! Fewer people would be able to find it. In the end, News Corp would suffer more than Google.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47527#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47527 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Stand-alone?  Really?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47522</link>
 <description>I don&#039;t have to install anything?  Can I burn it to a CD or DVD as a Live disk?  That is what would really be a true Stand-alone. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47522&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47522#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47522 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I disagree with this.  My experience has proven both sleep and hibernate (in Windows) take away about 50% of the total system pe</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47484</link>
 <description>I disagree with this.  My experience has proven both sleep and hibernate (in Windows) take away about 50% of the total system performance upon returning to the system.

Again, my experience has proven, save you work, shut down.  Unless you&#039;re literally going to use it within 5-10 minutes and only for 20-30 minutes.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47484#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47484 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Alternatives to MobileMe</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47467</link>
 <description>As for me I use SyncMate. It is absolutely free (Contacts and iCal sync) and allows syncing my Mac with Windows Mobile, other Mac and PC.

As far as I know SyncMate also supports Mac and Nokia S40, Sony PSP, Google account synchronization.

You can find detailed information about SyncMate at their homepage http://www.sync-mac.com/syncmate-features.html
</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47467#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47467 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Balloon Boys iPhone app - make balloon boy hoax of your own</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47436</link>
 <description>Right, its called Balloon Boys. Using iPhone&#039;s camera, you can put a balloon boy anywhere in the sky.

Put anti-aircraft gun sights on him. You can see the boy hanging from the balloon.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47436#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47436 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Recalls</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47424</link>
 <description>&quot;Retailers currently receive a number of notices from a number of different sources,” said Tim White

Further down:

“These things will happen because manufacturers and retailers are sourcing products from around the world,” she said. “So in case something does happen, we need to have a system that works, a system that’s fast, a system that allows retailers and suppliers to take product off the shelf.” 

Absolutely Correct. I could not agree more.

But barcodes are ABSOLUTELY not the answer! The recent Peanut Butter recall was a prime example. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47424&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47424#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47424 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>So if FTC&#039;s case is more about the future, does this mean that Intel is err, suspected of some nasty dealings in its feeble atte</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47417</link>
 <description>So if FTC&#039;s case is more about the future, does this mean that Intel is err, suspected of some nasty dealings in its feeble attempts to steal some of ARM&#039;s market?  One has to wonder whatever got into Nokia to use Atom for a MID.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47417#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Scunnerous</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47417 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cloud Computing</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47363</link>
 <description>It&#039;s inevitable, but no one said when! </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47363#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47363 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft Is Perfect Example Why Executive Pay Is Broken</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47356</link>
 <description>Text message this morning from CNN: Unemployment hit 10.2% in October. Microsoft announced earlier this week another 800 employee layoffs to the 5,000 previously announced employee layoffs. If you look at Microsoft&#039;s financials you see why, a 14% revenue and 18% net income drop for the last reported quarter, on top of disappointing prior quarters. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47356#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/154">Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22748">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1228">Apple iPhone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1612">Apple Mac</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11735">executive pay</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9437">Google Android</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2614">Google Apps</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1003">Google Docs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/426">Linux</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1614">Microsoft Office</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24738">Open Office</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/260">open source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24737">unemployment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7678">Windows 7</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1599">windows mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2737">Windows Vista</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47356 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Proprietary?  Not open?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47355</link>
 <description>People who don&#039;t understand should keep quiet.  The only &quot;proprietary&quot; element in this enitre architecture is the blade servers themselves, but as mentioned - that&#039;s the same with ALL vendors (HP, IBM, Dell, etc.)  Saying VMWare (supporting dozens of OS&#039;s) and EMC (supporting ALL industry procotocls from FC to FCOE) and saying IP all being &quot;Not open&quot; is obviously wrong.

This is an architecture, NOT a product.   IMHO this is a perfect hybrid of &quot;best of breed&quot; (Cisco, EMC, VMware) products coming together to build an architecture and a &quot;single throat to choke&quot; approach. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47355&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47355#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47355 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Virtualbox</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47332</link>
 <description>Virtualbox, free, so far for me runs better and has more features.  On the other hand it doesn&#039;t come with a free license for XP.  I&#039;d love to see a review comparing the two -</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47332#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47332 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why not Full Disclosure?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47329</link>
 <description>Bloggers are now asked to disclose any compensation they might receive for their reviews/opinions... why not ask Gartner to disclose which MQ rated firms are customers?</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47329#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47329 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Old News</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47271</link>
 <description>Man in the middle atacks ae nothing new.  This article is presenting information that is already out there.  Not very news worthy.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47271#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47271 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>For the record</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47247</link>
 <description>I think it&#039;s important to point out that John Mucci was the founding CEO of SiCortex.  He was the &quot;grownup&quot; who brought management credibility and an incredible HPC rolodex, without which Matt and I would have been a couple of geeks in the wilderness.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47247#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47247 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco computer game lets you play CEO</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47225</link>
 <description>If you want to be a CEO but not have any of the real responsibilities of one, you could try to play a new online game being offered by Cisco.  The company this week posted myPlanNet, a computer game that lets anyone be a broadband executive making network deployment decisions.  Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47225#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/154">Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/33">E-commerce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3240">ceo</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4117">computer games</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24701">myPlanNet</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Layer 8</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47225 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fokho</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47223</link>
 <description>Fokho</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47223#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47223 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Modern Warfare 2 is going to kick ass</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47176</link>
 <description>this game is the most anticipated game in the year no doubt!!!</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47176#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47176 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Please finish the article</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47168</link>
 <description>Great read but you help no one unless you give examples of what e-mails to look for to insure they are being blocked.

IT Director</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47168#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47168 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Email</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47162</link>
 <description>Have you never tried gmail?</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47162#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47162 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
