<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>VMware</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>VMware sees the value of working with Microsoft</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31306</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;VMware can&amp;#39;t pretend it has got the wherewithal to face down a direct attack by Microsoft and survive. So it has done the smartest move available -- cooperation. Earlier this week Microsoft said it was revamping its licensing fees for products on virtualized servers but would not support products running on VMware. That, coupled with VMware&amp;#39;s other missteps, obviously put the pressure on VMware to come to Microsoft&amp;#39;s table. But why shouldn&amp;#39;t VMware join the other hypervisors and get its hypervisor certified by Microsoft as compatible with Microsoft server products? Leaving itself out of that party only gives users even more reason to check out Hyper-V or Citrix Xen. They have plenty of reasons already given the price of the younger hypervisors.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31306#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7244">hypervisor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12338">Microsoft licensing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:40:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31306 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Virtualization - Breaking up is hard to do</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31141</link>
 <description>Desktop virtualization concepts and benefits have already been proven out, largely through old-school remote-desktop products from companies like Citrix Systems and Microsoft. We know the benefits of standardization, managing better desktop change control, remote desktop access, desktop and data storage, and business continuity. Desktop virtualization has already begun the march to take over previous remote-desktop technologies. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31141&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31141#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8837">Calista</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14763">CE application virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14748">CTO Simon Crosby</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8839">desktop virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14749">SoftGrind Kidaro</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3326">Softricity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8840">Thinstall</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/168">Web 2.0</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5020">XenSource</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:29:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31141 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;IT&quot; Far From Problem-Free</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31112</link>
 <description>If you&#039;ve been following the general IT industry news for the last week or so, you&#039;ve noticed some major stories that have hit the wire.  From the VMWare ESX/ESXi bug that brought some virtualization infrastructures to a halt, to the multiple instance Google Apps / Gmail outages, it has been recently quite busy.

On a lighter note, and since it is Friday afternoon, let&#039;s reflect on what these outages and problems mean to IT managers, corporate leaders, and the end users.  
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31112&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31112#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/154">Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/33">E-commerce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/84">Outsourcing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4675">bug</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14718">bugfix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8004">ESX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14273">ESXi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/943">Gmail</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2614">Google Apps</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13492">outage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14719">patch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:32:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matthew Nickasch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31112 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Paul, Welcome to VMWare</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31070</link>
 <description>Looks like Diane left you a little going away gift.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31070#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:58:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31070 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>why chen is criticizing so much?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30992</link>
 <description>why chen is criticizing so much?

why don&#039;t he think virtualization has reduced the load of physical server and thereby power consumpton and VMware has gurnatee that they will fix all the issue without any data loss.

As you know mistakes often happen... 

if you buy any software it should have some bug...

but always think that how this software has made us task easy.

I know it is frustrating...

In this modern world nothing is perfect.

so please don&#039;t try to criticize so much.

if you can&#039;t handle then don&#039;t buy no software and do it everythingmanual....</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30992#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:29:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30992 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>VMware Infrastructure Toolkit emerges and more…</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30549</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hey now... I blogged about &lt;a href=&quot;/node/19739&quot;&gt;VMware&amp;#39;s foray into the PowerShell realm last year&lt;/a&gt;.  Looks like earlier this week VMware finally &amp;quot;released&amp;quot; their Infrastructure Toolkit.  You can download the toolkit here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vmware.com/sdk/vitk_win/index.html&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30549&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30549#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14273">ESXi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14274">VMware Infrastructure API</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:45:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tkopczynski</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30549 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;openQRM is not dead&quot; by Kris B.</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30217</link>
 <description>Kris Buytaert is talking about &quot;openQRM is not dead&quot; at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2008/&quot; target=&quot;_BLANK&quot;&gt;Linuxsymposium 2008&lt;/a&gt; in Ottawa !

He is talking about the next generation of &lt;a href=&quot;http://openqrm.sourceforge.net/&quot; target=&quot;_BLANK&quot;&gt;openQRM&lt;/a&gt; ported from java to php. Please find the slides of his talk at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.krisbuytaert.be/blog/node/688&quot; target=&quot;_BLANK&quot;&gt;http://www.krisbuytaert.be/blog/node/688&lt;/a&gt;

Many thanks to Kris for pushing the openQRM Project to the next level. Also big thanks to Aland for organising the &lt;a href=&quot;http://virtminisummit.linux.hp.com/program&quot; target=&quot;_BLANK&quot;&gt;virtualization miniconf&lt;/a&gt; on behalf of Linuxsymposium !

Enjoy !</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30217#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/605">data center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8269">openqrm</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8270">server</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:21:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MattR</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30217 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The lowered estimates are due to Hyper-V</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30206</link>
 <description>VMware is blaming the slow economy for its reduced estimates, but that doesn&amp;#39;t make a whole lot of sense given what its product does (reduces ROI). (Check out &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/community/?q=node/30205&quot;&gt;VMware: quarter not bad; outlook not good and (ironically) wins a Tech Ed award&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30206#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30206 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>VMware: quarter not bad; outlook not good and (ironically) wins a Tech Ed award</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30205</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/Micronet%20images/VMwareLogo.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;Given that VMware &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/070808-vmware-ousts-greene.html&quot;&gt;ditched its founder in favor &lt;/a&gt;of a Microsoft executive two weeks before reporting its Q2 results, one would have thought that the quarter would have shown a company bleeding red. Not so. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1124610/000119312508155277/dex991.htm&quot;&gt;VMware reported healthy revenue growth&lt;/a&gt;, healthy profits and increases in both U.S. and international software licenses. Plus, it is sitting on $1.5 billion in cash. From an enterprise&amp;#39;s point of view, there is no urgent reason to worry about the company&amp;#39;s financial standing. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30205&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30205#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4689">financial report</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:40:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30205 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Women CEOs in Silicon Valley ... and then there were none</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29843</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(Fair warning: this is an off topic post).&lt;/em&gt; Here&amp;#39;s an interesting, if somewhat sad, fact from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_9848633&quot;&gt;San Jose Mercury News&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;img src=&quot;/graphics/ab5_images/062408-greene-pic.gif&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;66&quot; height=&quot;75&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;With this week&amp;#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/070808-vmware-ousts-greene.html&quot;&gt;ouster of Diane Greene from the company&lt;/a&gt; she founded 10 years ago, there are now exactly zero women CEOs at the largest  Valley tech firms. Now there are  women in powerful positions  (Cisco&amp;#39;s  CTO Padmasree Warrior, Oracle co-president and Chief Financial Officer Safra Catz, and HP  Executive Vice President Ann Livermore).  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29843&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29843#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4843">Women in IT</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:52:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29843 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Capitalistic Utopia</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29784</link>
 <description>VMware is definitely in a rough spot, but not necessarily a bad one.  I hear all this talk about wallstreet being upset.  The greed aspect might be upsetting if you&#039;re greedy, but to me this is more of a realistic market correction.  

VMware was the Zar of the virtual world, and now there are competing kingdoms.  If they want to survive they will most definitely have to address their pricing, and application virtualization for that matter.

Still, VMotion rocks.  VMware has great managment tools, and in my opinion, doesn&#039;t talk about that enough.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29784#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:18:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Larson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29784 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Greene out at VMware</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29725</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/070808-vmware-replaces-ceo-shares.html?ts0hb=&amp;amp;story=ts_vmw&quot;&gt;VMware&lt;/a&gt; this week ousted co-founder and CEO &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/062408-vmware-diane-greene.html?ts0hb=&amp;amp;story=ts_vmw&quot;&gt;Diane Greene&lt;/a&gt; and replaced her with &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/070808-vmware-ousts-greene.html?ts0hb=&amp;amp;story=ts_vmw&quot;&gt;Paul Maritz&lt;/a&gt;, who has served as president of parent company EMC&amp;#39;s Cloud Division. Maritz is also a former Microsoft executive who managed marketing and development for products such as Windows 95 and Windows NT.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29725&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29725#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5923">Diane Greene</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13477">Paul Maritz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12655">virtual</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:18:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Denise Dubie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29725 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EMC Puts Microsoft Exec In VMware CEO Seat  </title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29676</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;float: right&quot; src=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABPub/2008/02/21/2004194643.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;News from Microsoft WPC, Houston, TX:&lt;/strong&gt; What happens when your over inflated  stock price of $120 per share dips down to 1/3rd its value (and still might be  over inflated)? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29676&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29676#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5923">Diane Greene</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/800">EMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7395">Microsoft Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/264">Oracle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13477">Paul Maritz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2454">Sun MicroSystems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13478">Virtual Iron</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:47:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29676 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bad for Diane, perhaps good for VMware users</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29669</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is a shame that Diane Greene is being put through the wringer like this. But it may be good for users and VMware that a Microsoft exec is being asked to lead. Microsoft&amp;#39;s release of Hyper-V will almost certainly lead to eventual doom for VMware unless VMware can come up with some kind of technological angle that will make vast numbers of Windows users want to stick with it (and pay big bucks for it) instead of moving to Hyper-V.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;   &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Visit &lt;a href=&quot;/subnets/microsoft/&quot;&gt;the Microsoft Subnet home page for more news, blogs, podcasts.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29669#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5923">Diane Greene</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:35:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29669 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft vs. VMware: analyst says Microsoft has a performance leg-up</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29575</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft this week released its Hyper-V virtualization server, which has been years &lt;img src=&quot;/Micronet%20images/VMwareLogo.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; in the making. Today the technology lacks the breadth of functionality VMware offers, but now that the technology is readily available, could Microsoft wrest market share from VMware with its no-cost entry point and by shipping the technology with Microsoft Server 2008? Forrester Research Analyst Christopher Voce weighs in on the topic. (14:39)    &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29575&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29575#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13416">Christopher Voce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13415">Forrester Research</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7244">hypervisor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:30:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29575 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>openQRM 4.0 VMware-appliance for easy-testing</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29509</link>
 <description>For easy-testing openQRM 4.0 the openQRM-Team created an openQRM VMware-appliance which provides a complete openQRM-Server out-of-the-box based on Debian (Etch). 

Here the direct link to download it : 
 
http://www.openqrm-ng.net/downloads/openqrm-4.0.vmware-appliance.bz2 
 
(1,2GB download size, all usernames and passwords on this appliance are &quot;openqrm&quot;) 

Just unzip, put it in your e.g. free VMware-player, click start, that&#039;s it.

Enjoy ! </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29509#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12711">appliance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9074">data-center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8269">openqrm</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:27:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MattR</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29509 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Diane Greene forgot about IBM&#039;s 40 year history with z/VM</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29475</link>
 <description>I suggest readers compare the statements made by Diane to the security, and robustness of z/VM, the worlds first hypervisor.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29475#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/231">IBM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:30:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29475 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>7 skills for IT fame and fortune</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29471</link>
 <description>&lt;img style=&quot;float: right&quot; src=&quot;http://theconvergingnetwork.com/images/7_Skills.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;With the economic downturn on everyone&amp;#39;s mind, assumptions about job security come under question, and everyone starts reexamining their skills. There are lots and lots of valuable jobs performed in IT, but some skills are valued even more highly than others. With all the upheaval we&amp;#39;re experiencing in IT, many  new skills are in high demand or rapidly increasing in value. Here are my Top 7 skills that could help you not only keep that job, but secure an even better new job, positioning you to work on the next generation of IT applications and software products in the era of Web-delivered online applications. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29471&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29471#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/154">Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/84">Outsourcing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2330">Certifications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/67">CISSP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2490">MCSE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11597">MCTS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13349">multi-tenant</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11720">PaaS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13347">QA automation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13348">QA metrics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/754">SaaS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13350">secure code</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13346">UI design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/245">Web Applications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:52:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29471 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Limitations Won&#039;t Dampen Hyper-V</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29391</link>
 <description>Thursday was Hyper-V &amp;quot;hyperventilate day&amp;quot; as everyone reported about  &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/062608-microsoft-ships-hyperv.html?hpg1=bn&quot;&gt;Hyper-V&amp;#39;s release&lt;/a&gt;. I&amp;#39;m sure Windows Server 2008 machines all over the world will  be downloading Hyper-V via Windows Update come the 2nd week in July. You can  manually download Hyper-V until then. I&amp;#39;m excited to start working with the  final bits on my servers as well, something I&amp;#39;ll be doing after finishing this  blog post. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29391&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29391#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3642">Citrix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6979">Microsoft System Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13295">product quality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2968">Windows Server 2008</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1104">Xen</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:33:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29391 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I for one welcome our new Hyper-V overlords…</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29389</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hurray, Hyper-V has been released.  Yes, I&amp;#39;m sure every blogger and newsy person on the planet is posting something about Microsoft&amp;#39;s release today (as they should).  But... how many of those posters have been testing Hyper-V since the fall of last year.  :&amp;gt;)&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Anyhow, as a general rule, I don&amp;#39;t talk about (beta and RC) products I&amp;#39;m currently testing.  That way I don&amp;#39;t violate any NDAs.  However, now that Hyper-V has been released to the masses the veil of non-communications can finally be removed. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29389&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29389#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13294">RTM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/412">VMware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2968">Windows Server 2008</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:50:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tkopczynski</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29389 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
