<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Postini</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4292</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Virus attacks highest ever in July, Google says</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31011</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;With two &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/30965&quot;&gt;Gmail outages&lt;/a&gt; in as many weeks, perhaps it&#039;s time that Google turned its attention to e-mail security, specifically e-mail viruses. The company posted notes on both the &lt;a href=&quot;http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2008/08/new-spam-and-virus-trends-from.html&quot;&gt;Google Online Security Blog&lt;/a&gt; and on &lt;a href=&quot;http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2008/08/security-spotlight-july-virus-attacks.html&quot;&gt;Google&#039;s Enterprise Blog&lt;/a&gt; saying that this July was hands-down the worst for virus attacks and noted that on July 24 alone, Google&#039;s Postini servers encountered nearly 10 million virus-laden messages.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31011&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31011#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14647">July</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4292">Postini</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/74">spam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14646">Virus attacks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14648">zero-hour</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:58:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Google Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31011 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Google unbundles Postini security services</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24733</link>
 <description>How about a story on how this SCREWS Postini&#039;s channel resellers, by offering online &quot;basic&quot; Postini filtering for 1/10th of the former retail price &amp; even the  &quot;regular&quot; product (inbound\outbound\custom filtering\spooling) for LESS than the current COST to resellers ($12 vs. $15).   </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24733#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/158">messaging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4292">Postini</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/74">spam</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:45:14 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24733 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Why did Google acquire Postini?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17609</link>
 <description>I think there are two main reasons that explain why &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/gwm/2007/0716msg1.html&quot;&gt;Google has acquired Postini&lt;/a&gt;:

- Archiving as a way to get large clients on Google Apps when they face legal requirements (SOX...).  I have already seen many requests in this field.

- A set of clients using Exchange or IBM Lotus Notes to whom it will be easier to propose a move to Google Apps.

I don&#039;t think Google will acquire an email company which has an offering for Intranet.  Two reasons :
- Outside of Notes and Exchange, no vendor has a significant market share.

- This will go against the main strategy of Google, offering SaaS solutions which run on its ultra efficent infrastructures.

Of course, I may be wrong! Time will tell.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17609#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4292">Postini</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:19:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Louis Naugès</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">17609 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
