<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Cisco NAC</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Duel of the NAC experts, live tomorrow</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30139</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/graphics/chat/joel-snyder-chat-pic-tiny.JPG&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Joel Synder&quot; width=&quot;47&quot; height=&quot;47&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/graphics/templates/stiennon_thumb.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Richard Stiennon&quot; width=&quot;47&quot; height=&quot;47&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30139&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30139#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13948">Joel Snyder</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11334">Live chat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5196">Microsoft NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/760">NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3531">network access control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13949">Richard Stiennon</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:01:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30139 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Should you invest in NAC? Join the live debate tomorrow</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30152</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/graphics/chat/joel-snyder-chat-pic-tiny.JPG&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Joel Synder&quot; width=&quot;47&quot; height=&quot;47&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/graphics/templates/stiennon_thumb.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Richard Stiennon&quot; width=&quot;47&quot; height=&quot;47&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30152&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30152#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13914">ce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13948">Joel Snyder</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11334">Live chat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5196">Microsoft NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/760">NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3531">network access control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13949">Richard Stiennon</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:56:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30152 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Users prefer Cisco NAC over Microsoft NAP, researchers say</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29912</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Over on &lt;a href=&quot;/community/?q=node/29908&quot;&gt;Cisco Subnet&lt;/a&gt;, there is a long meaty post about how &lt;a href=&quot;/community/taxonomy/term/760/all&quot;&gt;NAC &lt;/a&gt; users perceive Cisco as superior to  other vendors in the market, including &lt;img src=&quot;/graphics/2008/sec-tools-B-68x78.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;68&quot; height=&quot;78&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;Microsoft. This  comes from a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infonetics.com/pr/2008/upna08.nac.nr.asp&quot;&gt; study by Infonetics Research&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;User Plans for Network Access Control: North America 2008&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;). Infonetics  queried  242 IT pros  about their NAC plans for   the next two years and asked for user perceptions on the big players:   Cisco, Juniper, F5, McAfee, Microsoft and Symantec. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29912&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29912#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3445">infonetics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13680">Juniper NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6947">Microsoft NAP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/760">NAC</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:56:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29912 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft NAP: Above The NAC Fray</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28917</link>
 <description>Recently &lt;em&gt;Network World&lt;/em&gt; reporter Tim Greene wrote about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://edge.networkworld.com/newsletters/vpn/2008/060908nac2.html&quot;&gt;longer-term view of Network Access Control&lt;/a&gt; (NAC), the broader market that Microsoft NAP fits into. Half the 17 companies Gartner considers NAC vendors are legitimate start-ups, and obviously the market won&amp;#39;t support 17 NAC vendors, so we&amp;#39;ll continue to see a shakeout, such as the recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theconvergingnetwork.com/2008/04/it-takes-a-vill.html&quot;&gt;closing of Lockdown Networks&lt;/a&gt;. Having formerly been part of the NAC market as CTO at StillSecure, one of the vendors that has risen as a NAC market leader, I still enjoy the competitive battles between NAC vendors. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28917&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28917#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12906">Forefront Sterling</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11054">Microsoft Forefront</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6947">Microsoft NAP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3531">network access control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7310">StillSecure</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:36:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28917 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco issues critical patch for NAC flaw</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27019</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Cisco issued an urgent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20080416-nac.shtml&quot;&gt;security advisory on Wednesday&lt;/a&gt; warning users about a critical vulnerability that exists in the company&amp;#39;s NAC appliance. The vulnerability allows an attacker to obtain the shared secret that is used between the Cisco Clean Access Server (CAS) and the Cisco Clean Access Manager (CAM). An attacker can obtain the shared secret from error logs that are transmitted over the network. Obtaining this information could enable an attacker to gain complete control of the CAS remotely. Cisco has forgone its biannual patching cycle to release this patch, The vulnerability rating is listed as a 10 on the CVSS scale. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27019&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27019#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6458">Cisco security advisory</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:25:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27019 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco readies Microsoft-compatible NAC; start-ups worried?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26944</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The promise (or threat, whichever way you want to look at it) of Cisco&amp;#39;s Microsoft-compatible NAC gear, which the network &lt;img style=&quot;width: 149px; height: 39px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/cisco-nac.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;149&quot; height=&quot;39&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;giant says will be ready in about a month, will mean that startup NAC vendors will have to step up their games to stay ahead of Cisco and Microsoft in the features they offer, according to &lt;a href=&quot;/newsletters/vpn/2008/041408nac1.html&quot;&gt;Tim Greene&amp;#39;s Network World NAC newsletter&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cisco NAC being compatible with Microsoft network access protection (NAP) means users can deploy NAC without having to also deploy a NAC client. Instead, endpoints using Microsoft Vista can use the built-in NAP client, Greene writes. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26944&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26944#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4642">Cisco Network Admission Control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6947">Microsoft NAP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11181">Microsoft Network Access Protection</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3531">network access control</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:40:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26944 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Another NAC vendor bites the dust: Cisco to blame?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26200</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Another NAC supplier closes its doors but is Cisco really to blame? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26200&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26200#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10526">Lockdown Networks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/760">NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3531">network access control</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:00:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26200 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco NAC Appliance: Enforcing Host Security with Clean Access</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26029</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;CISCO NAC APPLIANCE: ENFORCING HOST SECURITY WITH CISCO CLEAN ACCESS &lt;img style=&quot;width: 160px; height: 197px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/cisco-nac-book.bmp&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;160&quot; height=&quot;197&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;by Jamey Heary, Jerry Lin, Chad Sullivan and Alok Agrawal&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Who better to explain the workings of Cisco Network Admission Control than Cisco staffer and security expert Jamey Heary, along with colleagues Jerry Lin, Chad Sullivan and Alok Agrawal? Heary, CCIE No. 7680, is a security consulting systems engineer at Cisco, where he works with its largest customers in the northwest United States. When not consulting, he is a frequent &lt;a href=&quot;/community/heary&quot;&gt;blogger for Cisco Subnet&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26029&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26029#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10293">Cisco books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1892">Cisco Press</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:05:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Inbox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26029 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco, Avenda enable multivendor network access policy management</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24850</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Cisco has signed a pact with Avenda Systems that will allow the policy management vendor to provision the &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/22704&quot;&gt;TrustSec&lt;/a&gt; features embedded in Cisco switches with Avenda&amp;#39;s eTIPS software for identity and role-based network management. Avenda says the licensing agreement will enable eTIPS customers to manage network access policies for Cisco NAC, Microsoft NAP, as well as Cisco TrustSec from a single policy management system. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://search.networkworld.com/query.html?qt=TrustSec&amp;amp;&quot;&gt;More about TrustSec here&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;More from Cisco Subnet:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;* &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/24842&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Cisco vs. Juniper Episode II: Enterprise switching&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24850&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24850#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9392">Avenda</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6947">Microsoft NAP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/760">NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3531">network access control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7805">TrustSec</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:06:52 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24850 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco NAC Appliance gets some new features</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24774</link>
 <description>Cisco recently released version 4.1(3) of their NAC Appliance product line.  4.1(3) has a slew of new features in it that I thought you might be interested in.  The most noteworthy, to me anyway, is the addition of a web agent client delivered via java or activeX.  This web agent client does not require admin privileges to run, unlike the traditional clean access agent.   &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24774&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24774#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5001">clean access</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4620">Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4641">Jamey Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/760">NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2133">NAC Appliance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:35:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jheary</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24774 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sneak peek of &#039;Cisco Network Admission Control: NAC Framework Architecture and Design&#039; book</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20962</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This week&amp;#39;s sneak peek of a free chapter from a Cisco Press book is an excerpt from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ciscopress.com/authors/bio.asp?a=438add0d-d666-45a4-bbce-6bb98bdceb45&amp;amp;rl=1&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt; Cisco Network Admission Control, Volume I: NAC Framework Architecture and Design&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;,&lt;/em&gt; by Denise Helfrich, Lou Ronnau, Jason Frazier, and Paul Forbes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#39;s the blurb from Cisco Press: &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20962&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20962#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3531">network access control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:34:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20962 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ForeScout to Cisco: Watch out</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20247</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Network access control vendor ForeScout is launching its CounterACT product squarely at Cisco, and sending its VARs to target Cisco accounts, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.channelinsider.com/article/ForeScout+Takes+Aim+at+Cisco/216511_1.aspx&quot;&gt;according to ChannelInsider&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ForeScout CounterACT 6.2 supports VoIP and allows for policy enforcement and endpoint identification, without dropping any calls or connections, reports ChannelInsider. The Web site also reports that partners can expect around 30% - 35% services on top of the sale.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;See how ForeScout stacks up against the rest, including Cisco, in &lt;em&gt;Network World&amp;#39;s&lt;/em&gt; Clear Choice Test &lt;a href=&quot;/reviews/2007/073007-test-nac-scorecard.html&quot;&gt;score card&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20247&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20247#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6160">ForeScout</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3531">network access control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2046">VARs</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:51:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20247 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Schools dump Cisco</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20241</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not very good news for Cisco in the education market today. &lt;em&gt;Network World&amp;#39;s&lt;/em&gt; Jim Duffy is reporting of two schools that are switching out Cisco switches for equipment from rival vendors due to what they say is greater feature/functionality from competitive offerings, and lower prices, reports Duffy. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fayetteville State University (FSU) in Fayetteville, N.C., is replacing more than 50 of its 280 Cisco switches with ConSentry equipment because of the embedded network access control (NAC) capabilities of those switches. FSU said it suffered problems with Cisco Clean Access NAC appliance, which kept going down. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Duffy reports:  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20241&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20241#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6158">ConSentry</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/970">education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/760">NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1363">ProCurve</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:43:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20241 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Winners of Jamey Heary&#039;s Cisco NAC book</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/19199</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to all those who entered to win a copy of Jamey Heary&amp;#39;s recently published book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1587053063/ref=nosim/fusion0e&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#333366&quot;&gt;Cisco NAC Appliance: Enforcing Host Security with Clean Access&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Before we give a roll call of the winners, here&amp;#39;s the answer to the trivia question:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Question:&lt;/strong&gt; At the beginning of July, Cisco signed an agreement to sell an appliance that automatically discovers and profiles all devices attached to the network. What is the name of the manufacturer of that product?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Answer:&lt;/strong&gt; Great Bay. See &lt;a href=&quot;/newsletters/vpn/2007/0709nac1.html&quot;&gt;this story&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The winners are: &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/19199&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/19199#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1892">Cisco Press</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4641">Jamey Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3330">Network Admission Control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:10:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19199 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco planning oneNAC for easier NAC deployment</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18951</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Cisco is developing oneNAC, a hybrid of its NAC schemes with the aim of making it easier for customers to maintain, deploy and scale up Cisco NAC, according to a story by Network World&amp;#39;s Tim Greene. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2007/083107-cisco-one-nac.html&quot;&gt;According to the story&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The upgrades would make it possible for customers to buy Cisco’s NAC appliance - the NAC option most of its customers opt for first - and later migrate to its network-based NAC Framework architecture without having to swap out as many elements.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18951&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18951#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4642">Cisco Network Admission Control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/760">NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3531">network access control</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:37:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">18951 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Enter to win a Cisco NAC book</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18037</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We&amp;#39;ve secured 15 copies of a brand new Cisco Press book to give away. The book won&amp;#39;t be out until next week, so it will be truly a hot-off-the-press book! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ciscopress.com/title/1587053063&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Cisco NAC Appliance: Enforcing Host Security with Clean Access&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, by Jamey Heary, with contributing authors Jerry Lin, Chad Sullivan and Alok Agrawal, provides you with all the information needed to understand, design, configure, deploy, and troubleshoot the Cisco NAC appliance. You will learn about all aspects of Cisco NAC, including configuration and best practices for design, implementation, troubleshooting, and creating a host security policy.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18037&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18037#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4643">Cisco NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4642">Cisco Network Admission Control</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1892">Cisco Press</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4641">Jamey Heary</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:10:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">18037 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
