<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>3Com</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Are HP, 3Com a better value than Cisco?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/44279</link>
 <description>HP and 3Com are claiming that their switches offer a better value that Cisco equipment, due largely to lower price for comparable performance. But does that equate to overall value in every instance? Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/44279#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15981">Cisco switches</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2899">HP ProCurve</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">44279 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>3Com bests Cisco in school upgrade</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/42917</link>
 <description>File this one under, current-economy-a-good-time-to-consider-alternatives. Quinnipiac University in Connecticut is replacing its Cisco network with 3Com. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/42917#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12336">competition</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1589">Switching</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42917 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>3com</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32036</link>
 <description>3com 4500G or the new 4800 series...cheap,solid from the company that&#039;s been doing networking since day 1.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32036#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32036 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco, be quick or you will be dead!</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29606</link>
 <description>3com 5500g is really very fast! </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29606#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29606 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bain and Huawei throw in the towel; 3Com left out in the cold</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26201</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s it. Bain Capital Partners and China&amp;#39;s Huawei Technologies have thrown in the towel and &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/032008-deal-to-buy-3com-falls.html&quot;&gt;abandoned their bid&lt;/a&gt; to buy 3Com blaming security concerns of the U.S. government, which is shuddering at the thought of one of its networking equipment suppliers being owned by a China-based company that has strong ties with the country&amp;#39;s government. Bain and Huawei first announced their intention to buy 3Com for $2.2B last September but the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) has made it difficult for the deal to go ahead. 3Com had even &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/24990&quot;&gt;offered to sell off&lt;/a&gt; its network security software division Tipping Point to sweeten the deal for the U.S. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26201&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26201#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1067">Huawei</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26201 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: 3Com has to try again</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25263</link>
 <description>Interesting turn of events with Tipping Point being cited as the culprit, or  the deal breaker....</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25263#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">25263 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Security issues scuttle Bain/Huawei bid for 3Com</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25230</link>
 <description>I wonder just how much of this was the effect of Cisco lobbying against it.  Too bad...  The US keeps trying to close the borders and while we may isolate ourselves from &quot;competition&quot; what we&#039;re really doing is isolating ourselves from the world...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25230#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1067">Huawei</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">25230 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco lawsuit illustrates the murky world of patent litigation</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24939</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/021108-network-1-poe-patent-suit.html?page=1&quot;&gt;lawsuit&lt;/a&gt; that Cisco has been served by Network-1 Security Solutions clearly illustrates Cisco&amp;#39;s argument that the United States&amp;#39; patent laws are desperately in need of reform. Network-1 &lt;img style=&quot;width: 88px; height: 56px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/court.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;88&quot; height=&quot;56&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;is suing Cisco, and others including Linksys, Foundry Networks, Extreme Networks and 3com, for infringement of a remote power patent. But the technology was not developed by Network-1. Instead, Network-1 acquires and licenses intellectual property &amp;quot;to maximize its value for the benefit of our investors and inventors.&amp;quot;  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24939&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24939#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2591">Extreme</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3021">Foundry</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9434">intellectual property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/95">Linksys</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9436">patent infringement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9433">patent reform</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24939 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>3Com to release two MSR apps: Is this a chance to steal Cisco ISR customers away?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24109</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;3Com has Cisco&amp;#39;s Integrated Services Routers squarely in its sights as it prepares to launch two applications - one for Asterisk VoIP, and the other for WAN acceleration/optimization - to &lt;img style=&quot;width: 88px; height: 53px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/3com-Logo.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;88&quot; height=&quot;53&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;support its MRS series of multiservice routers (&lt;a href=&quot;/buyersguides/guide.php?cat=881341&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;learn more about access routers in Network World&amp;#39;s Access Routers Buyer&amp;#39;s Guide).&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; The applications are built to 3Com&amp;#39;s year-old &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2007/012907-3com-open-source.html &quot;&gt;Open Services Networking (OSN) initiative&lt;/a&gt; that allows its routers to run apps from third-parties. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24109&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24109#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8784">Integrated Services Routers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2846">ISR</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8783">MRS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8785">Open Services Networking initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8786">OSN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1074">routers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4114">WAN acceleration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1250">WAN optimization</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24109 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: 3Com joins the list of one-generation companies</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21416</link>
 <description>Great article and a great observation but it omitted to also highlight how flawed are (were) the BoDs at each of the aforementioned companies. BoDs in technology-centric companies are a bigger part of the problem than management since, for the most part, BoDs are not tech-savvy and always drive the financial engineering agenda since that is what they know…Also, MIT guys have much bigger egos than Harvard guys…</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21416#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21416 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Cisco vs. Bay/3Com/Cabletron/Juniper</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21215</link>
 <description>3Com Buy News with relations to China Puts forward interesting theory. MASS BUYING..

China did the same in Telecom . Never game huge contracts. Instead asked Motorola to tweat some technology and sell to China. Motorola networks as much as I know is not TOP 3 slot or not-much in news.


NOW Juniper can do something like this.

Juniper + Sycamore [ Optical ] + Broadcom can stich allaince and get Listed on Bombay Stock Exchange.

Vinod Khosla has experience stiching alliances.....

Plz India-as-strategic-investor;India-for-IndianRetailSelling; India-as-iMarket;Rechristen-As-Indian

Might help. 


There aren&#039;t lot many people in India at minute diff level. Word-of-mouth and peer-success is deciding factor.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21215#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1067">Huawei</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 09:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21215 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>3Com Speeds Up</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20871</link>
 <description>   3Com finally arrived at the gigabit Ethernet party being thrown by small businesses everywhere. Although lagging behind other SMB favorites such as Linksys and Netgear and even HP, at least 3Com appeared. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20871#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4136">Gigabit Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/563">HP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/95">Linksys</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/348">Netgear</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Gaskin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20871 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>3Com Still Our Friend</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20126</link>
 <description> You probably saw the headlines about 3Com being bought by a partnership of a private investment firm and the company doing most of their manufacturing in China. Will they remain focused on small and medium business networking tools? Probably, says this article recommending 3Com customers stand pat for now. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20126#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1067">Huawei</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Gaskin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20126 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shouldn&#039;t we give 3Com a chance?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20107</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So now Huawei and Bain Capital have bailed out 3Com and given it a &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2007/092807-huawei-fund-buy-3com.html&quot;&gt;$2 billion new lease of life&lt;/a&gt;, what are its chances of competing with its old arch enemy, Cisco? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Analysts say an injection of funds won&amp;#39;t do much to scrub the memory of customers who were dropped when &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2000/03273exit.html&quot;&gt;3Com pulled out of the enterprise market 7 years ago&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20107&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20107#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6064">BloggingStocks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1067">Huawei</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20107 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Huawei, investment fund to buy 3Com for</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20057</link>
 <description>This is a very positive move! 3Com can make a real comeback with better financial strength that they have.

I can see the bright future for 3Com.

Good luck for 3Com!!</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20057#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1067">Huawei</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20057 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>3Com reportedly being sold to Bain, Huawei</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20021</link>
 <description>Confirming earlier rumors, 3Com is being sold to Bain Capital and one-time partner Huawei Technologies for a reported $2 billion in a deal expected to be announced later this morning, the Wall Street Journal is reporting.From the Journal:The cash deal values Marlborough, Mass.-based 3Com at more than $5 a share, the person said. Huawei Technologies, the Chinese networking giant, will take a minority...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20021#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1067">Huawei</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul McNamara</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20021 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Could a combined Nortel-3Com-Polycom beat Cisco?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/19684</link>
 <description>The combination of a united Nortel, 3Com and Polycom would create a formidable competitor to Cisco, writes Silicon Valley strategy consultant Sramana Mitra in her blog. She adds:Today, the networking industry is represented as Cisco and the Seven Dwarfs. Well, if at least 3-4 of the dwarfs get together, the chances of actually being able to compete in specific markets would become higher. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/19684#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1098">Nortel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2316">Polycom</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19684 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Suitors reportedly swarming 3Com - what does this mean for Cisco?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17655</link>
 <description>What would a 3Com owned by Nortel or by a set of private equity firms, mean to Cisco&#039;s market?On Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal’s Deal Journal blog reported that 3Com is being approached by private equity firms and Nortel. Private equity firms have been particularly active of late in the high-tech sector. Silver Lake Partners, mentioned along with Bain Capital by the WSJ as a possible suitor for...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17655#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">17655 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: 3Com on the block?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17619</link>
 <description>Having worked at both of these enterprise networking companies, I can honestly say that their resellers and channels don&#039;t overlap. 

&lt;em&gt;Re: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/071707-3com-sale-rumor.html&quot;&gt;3Com on the block?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

Sure, products do, but big deal. I have written on the need for consolidation among the &#039;Others&#039; and this would certainly fit. However, networking (LAN switching &amp; routing) is not growing much in North America. It&#039;s about China, and that&#039;s why Nortel needs to own it. Check out my blog at http://www.brockmann.com.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17619#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>pjbrockmann</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">17619 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is employing cheaper labor in China enough for you to switch vendors?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17514</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;3Com says employing cheaper labor in China allows it to price products at between 30% and 40% lower than its competitors, including Cisco. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3Com CEO Edgar Masri, says his company takes advantage of &amp;quot;abitrage&amp;quot; - exploiting the price differences between two markets. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;According to a &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2007/071207-3com-pins-hopes-on-chinas.html&quot;&gt;story by &lt;em&gt;IDG News Service&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, 3Com is relying on the cheaper China labor costs available through H-3C, its joint venture with Huawei that it &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2006/112906-3com-to-take-ownership-of.html&quot;&gt;now fully owns&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is the price differences through cheaper labor enough for 3Com to lure customers from Cisco and the others? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17514&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17514#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/527">3Com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/675">China</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">17514 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
