<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Juniper</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Cisco, Juniper should do well in the current downturn, says Goldman Sachs</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33997</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Goldman Sachs gave a glimmer of hope to Cisco and Juniper today as Simona Jankowski, an analyst at &lt;img style=&quot;width: 79px; height: 71px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/crs-1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;79&quot; height=&quot;71&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;the investment firm said Cisco is likely to outgrow its peers during the current downturn as well as in the long term, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssFinancialServicesAndRealEstateNews/idUSN1452824120081014&quot;&gt;reports Reuters&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33997&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33997#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16815">Cisco Broadband Telephony Services</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16812">Cisco layoffs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16739">credit crisis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3087">service providers</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:33:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33997 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ugly Cousin</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32422</link>
 <description>Cisco look out? This is silly. Cisco has done a masterful job in becoming the 1,845 pound hairless gorilla. Juniper is a very small primate by comparison. Today, buying a rival or complementary company is accepted practice in lieu of innovation and hard work. Throw a few billion dollars at them and suddenly you&#039;ve got several thousand new clients and some new gear to integrate. The folly of trying to munge code into a single base will keep the investors, analysts and customers spinning until the next magic act is formulated.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32422#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3931">Aruba</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:05:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Schratboy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32422 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco watch out: Juniper reported to be beefing up its wireless offerings with an acquisition</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32415</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sources have it that Juniper is looking to acquire a WLAN networking company to help beef up its profile &lt;img style=&quot;width: 71px; height: 88px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/wireless-user.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;71&quot; height=&quot;88&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;in the wireless networking space, according to a report on FT.com. The paper reports that Juniper is eyeing Aruba or Meru as possible suitors. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32415&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32415#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3931">Aruba</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15832">Juniper enterprise wireless</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3799">Meru</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:21:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32415 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Are you kidding? </title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32385</link>
 <description>How do you compare Fortinet to Juniper and Crossbeam?  Juniper does not have a single box that can deliver AV, IPS, Firewall, routing, SSL VPN, and URL filtering.  You get a subset of that.  

Crossbeam flies in the face of the UTM value proposition: reduced vendors, reduced complexity, reduced cost. 

Fortinet has all those features and is truly &quot;unified&quot;. </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32385#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9605">Crossbeam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1367">Fortinet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:48:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>stiennon</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32385 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Juniper sprints ahead of Cisco in edge routers</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32056</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Cisco&amp;#39;s lack of any new edge routers is hurting the company as it competes with Juniper in the service &lt;img style=&quot;width: 62px; height: 70px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/cisco-edge-router.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;62&quot; height=&quot;70&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;provider space, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=17&amp;amp;issue=20080827&quot;&gt;this story&lt;/a&gt; in Investor&amp;#39;s Business Daily. The story reports that Cisco revealed slower growth in its router business, which grew 8% year-over-year in &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/30749&quot;&gt;Cisco&amp;#39;s Q4&lt;/a&gt;, down from 14% growth in Q3. &amp;quot;That growth far lagged recent results of No. 2 networking gear maker Juniper Networks. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32056&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32056#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15536">Cisco edge routers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15535">Juniper edge routers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/15537">Juniper MX family</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:38:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32056 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Getting help in JUNOS</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31317</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I discussed in the &lt;a title=&quot;Managing a JUNOS Configuration&quot; href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30899&quot;&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt; how candidate configurations, explicit commits, and rollbacks greatly increase the reliability of configuration changes in JUNOS and reduce the risk of configuration mistakes. Heaven knows if there is a mistake to be made, I&#039;m likely to make it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another nice feature for klutzy typists such as myself is that rather than waiting until you hit return at the end of a configuration statement to check for syntax errors, JUNOS checks syntax word-by-word – that is, every time you enter a word into a line and hit the space bar, it checks the syntax. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31317&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31317#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4731">JUNOS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1081">switches</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:05:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jdoyle</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31317 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Web retailer slashes support costs by switching from Cisco to Juniper</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30994</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By swapping out Cisco gear for Juniper equipment, Amazingmail.com trimmed down support cost from  &lt;img style=&quot;width: 120px; height: 25px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/amazingmail.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;120&quot; height=&quot;25&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;$48,000 for Cisco to less than $6,000 per year for Juniper. By selling off the two-year-old Cisco hardware, Amazingmail.com says the project will pay for itself in eight months. The Scottsdale, Ariz., firm with about 90 employees spread over three sites made the swap during the first quarter of the year with no interruption to its online custom printing and mailing operations, says Larry Prine, lead systems administrator for the company.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30994&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30994#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14625">Amazingmail</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14626">Cisco support costs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14627">Juniper support costs</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:06:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30994 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What&#039;s the point?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30984</link>
 <description>Couldn&#039;t have Amazingmail.com simply swapped out the two 6500&#039;s with Cisco stackables that have an included warranty with them and saved the same amount of money?  Was their problems with the Cisco switches and ASA&#039;s (outside the fact they weren&#039;t trained on the equipment) causing them to swap out?  If they had support from Cisco, and couldn&#039;t get a feature to work, did they open a case with Cisco (who&#039;s support organization is the best in the industry if you know how to work with them).

The article seems like a shameless plug Network World as been posting for lots of vendors these days (I seem them for Cisco as well on other products).  It would be nice to see something with much stronger analysis and understanding that readers can actually get value out of.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30984#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1081">switches</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:14:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30984 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Welcome to the NAP party, Juniper!</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30736</link>
 <description>Nice to see another vendor with native support for NAP! I believe that makes two of us now.

Todd
http://www.napera.com</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30736#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3014">NAP</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:42:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>toddhooper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30736 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Networking now a two-horse race</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30347</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Juniper&amp;#39;s solid &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/072408-juniper-q4.html&quot;&gt;second quarter results announced yesterday&lt;/a&gt; has given analysts a glimmer of hope in the &lt;img style=&quot;width: 100px; height: 96px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/two-horse-race.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;96&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;softening economy. Juniper&amp;#39;s results beat consensus estimates as the Cisco rival posted an increase in sales of 32% and a leap in profit of 40%. Juniper also &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/072408-juniper-q4.html&quot;&gt;boosted  its outlook for the third quarter and the rest of the year&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30347&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30347#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14096">Juniper earnings</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:58:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30347 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Juniper hires Microsoft veteran as CEO</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30293</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The little blemish on his resume of failing to pull off Microsoft&amp;#39;s bid to aquire Yahoo didn&amp;#39;t deter Juniper &lt;img style=&quot;width: 96px; height: 107px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/kevin-johnson.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;96&quot; height=&quot;107&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;from naming Microsoft veteran Kevin Johnson as CEO, replacing Scott Kriens who continues as chairman. According to an &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/072308-report-head-of-microsofts-online.html&quot;&gt;IDG News Services story&lt;/a&gt;, news of Johnson&amp;#39;s departure from Microsoft comes just a week after the company released &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/30042&quot;&gt;financial earnings&lt;/a&gt; dragged down by its online services group. Microsoft will split up the group he ran.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30293&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30293#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12137">Kevin Johnson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:17:53 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30293 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The &quot;American Idol&quot; of  WAN Acceleration</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30227</link>
 <description>&lt;!--  /* Style Definitions */  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal 	{mso-style-parent:&quot;&quot;; 	margin:0in; 	margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;; 	mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;} @page Section1 	{size:8.5in 11.0in; 	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; 	mso-header-margin:.5in; 	mso-footer-margin:.5in; 	mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 	{page:Section1;} --&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Results of our WAN acceleration product feedback are in, and here is a quick summary of what we heard. For starters, if this were the application delivery system version of American Idol, Riverbed’s Steelhead would win. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30227&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30227#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3194">application performance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11311">Blue Coat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8415">Cisco WAAS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10464">Exinda</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11045">Expand</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10314">Packeteer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14000">Riverbed Steelhead</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6364">Silver Peak</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:51:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sevcik and Wetzel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30227 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Juniper&#039;s enterprise switch could give Cisco pause</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29902</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Network World&lt;a href=&quot;/reviews/2008/071408-test-juniper-switch.html&quot;&gt; tested Juniper&amp;#39;s first effort in enterprise switching&lt;/a&gt;, the EX 4200 and after doing so the &lt;img src=&quot;/graphics/community/juniper-ex.png&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;87&quot; height=&quot;83&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;testers had this word of warning, &amp;quot;Cisco take note: Juniper&amp;#39;s new EX 4200 switch not only fills a hole in a leading competitor&amp;#39;s product line, but also represents a credible alternative for enterprise access switching.&amp;quot;  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29902&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29902#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4481">Cisco Wide Area Application Services WAAS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9044">Juniper EX switch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4114">WAN acceleration</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:46:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29902 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Real deal or PR move? Cisco, IBM, Intel, Juniper and Microsoft form new security consortium</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29380</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#39;s an interesting idea that could either be a stroke a genius or rather lame. Cisco, IBM, Intel, Juniper and Microsoft today announced that they &lt;img style=&quot;width: 83px; height: 61px&quot; src=&quot;/Micronet%20images/handshake.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;83&quot; height=&quot;61&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;have formed &lt;a href=&quot;http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2008/prod_062608e.html&quot;&gt;a consortium to address multi-product security threats&lt;/a&gt;. If it works, it will be a source of vendor cooperation that stops the finger pointing. Instead of a not-our-problem attitude by individual vendors, the united group will march into the dark underworld and crush complex multi-product attacks as if stepping on oh-so-many cockroaches. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or not. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29380&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29380#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13277">Cisco rootkit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/231">IBM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13279">ICASI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13278">Industry Consortium for Advancement of Security on the Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/579">Intel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13276">Internet seucrity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/344">rootkit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13280">security consortium</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:27:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29380 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Catalyst 6500: The End Isn&#039;t Nigh...</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29142</link>
 <description>  &lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;Since Cisco launched the new Nexus range of switches, quite a number of people have asked me whether the advent of the Nexus switches heralds the demise of the Catalyst 6500. Furthermore, I have heard that some of Cisco&amp;#39;s competitors have been telling anyone who will listen that the 6500 will soon be gone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;Anyway, with all this apparent uncertainty (or misinformation) around I thought I&amp;#39;d find out what is really going on, so I asked some folks at Cisco and they confirmed that the 6500 will be around for a long time to come. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29142&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29142#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12496">6500</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1385">Catalyst</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13078">lacp</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9009">Nexus</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13079">pagp</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2269">switch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12497">vdc</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:04:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark_Lewis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29142 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tell Us What You Think of Exinda’s x800</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28988</link>
 <description>  &lt;p style=&quot;margin-top: 6pt&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana&quot;&gt;Australian upstart &lt;a href=&quot;http://exinda.com/&quot;&gt;Exinda Networks&lt;/a&gt; is in this week’s “ADS Customers Speak” spotlight. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28988&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28988#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3692">Application Performance Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11311">Blue Coat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10464">Exinda</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11045">Expand</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10314">Packeteer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12941">Radware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14650">review</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4113">Riverbed</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12876">Silverpeak</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:43:26 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sevcik and Wetzel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28988 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nortel, Cisco &amp; Juniper</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28482</link>
 <description>This article hit the bull&#039;s eye when mentioning about Juniper being late in the enterprise data market and Nortel, Cisco being well established. I am familiar with Nortel and Cisco products and therefore know their quality and performance. But Juniper trying to introduce a new line of products and make its entry into the tightly fought enterprise data market confuses me as to why is Juniper taking the risk of facing an inevitable loss? 

I work as a reseller of Nortel and Cisco networking and data products and I was wondering if any body knew of any testing results with regard to Juniper products? It would be interesting to see how Juniper forms partnerships with corporations and gain a respectable market share. 

yogesh@infinit-tech.com &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28482&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28482#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1098">Nortel</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:03:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ylnahar</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28482 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Juniper is chasing Cisco </title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28467</link>
 <description>It seems that Juniper is making a concerted effort against Cisco&#039;s enterprise business with an upgrade to Juniper support services. Fast, efficient intervention when incidents arise an ongoing monitoring for trouble are requirements of major corporate customer and Juniper&#039;s AIS services seem to be an attempt to fill that need.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28467#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:08:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28467 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Market Share</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28380</link>
 <description>It will take quite a while for Juniper to significantly erode at Cisco&#039;s market share in Enteprise Switching.  </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28380#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1081">switches</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:36:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28380 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tell Us What You Think of Juniper&#039;s WX </title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28157</link>
 <description>For the third installment in our &amp;quot;ADS Customers Speak&amp;quot; series we ask &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juniper.net/&quot;&gt;Juniper&lt;/a&gt; customers to share their experiences with Juniper&amp;#39;s WX solution. &lt;p&gt;Juniper got into the distributed (a.k.a. dual-ended) ADS market by buying Peribit, the layer 3 compression and caching pioneer. Juniper integrated the Peribit product in 2005 and renamed it the Juniper WX. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28157&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28157#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3194">application performance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/717">Juniper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14650">review</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4113">Riverbed</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4114">WAN acceleration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1250">WAN optimization</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:00:53 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sevcik and Wetzel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28157 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
