<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>WLANs</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7226</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Sneak peek of book &#039;Business Case for Enterprise-Class Wireless LANs&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33343</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This week&amp;#39;s sneak peek of a Cisco Press book is a chapter from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informit.com/store/product.aspx?isbn=1587201259&quot;&gt;Business Case for Enterprise-Class Wireless LANs&lt;/a&gt;, by David Castaneda, Oisin Mac Alasdair, and Christopher Vinckier. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#39;s the blurb from Cisco Press:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Business Case for Enterprise-Class Wireless LANs helps you make the right decisions by explaining the business value and cost of investing in a WLAN—from security and architecture to deployment and application. Using a lifecycle perspective, this guide covers the value proposition, cost justification, and alignment of security, design, and operational components within the business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Go to free chapter: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/subnets/cisco/031708-ch7-wireless-lans.html &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chapter 7: Security and Wireless LANs.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Go here for a &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/subnets/cisco/cisco-press-jump.html&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;comprehensive library of free chapters from new and classic Cisco Press books&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;More from Cisco Subnet:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/33294&quot;&gt;Cisco targets packet shaping market with Application Performance Assurance module&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/33311&quot;&gt;Cisco&amp;#39;s wise move of placing IOS inside VMware ESX&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/33208&quot;&gt;Cisco backs certification aimed at promoting the creation of hack-proof software&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/33275&quot;&gt;Podcast: Can Cisco makes its mark in the collaboration game?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/33263&quot;&gt;John Chambers personally suffers $208M paper loss&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Go to&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://null/subnets/cisco/&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;#333366&quot;&gt;Cisco Subnet&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt; for more Cisco news, blogs, discussion forums, security alerts, book giveaways, and more.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33343#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1892">Cisco Press</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3918">wireless LANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7226">WLANs</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:54:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33343 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Power Testing - Again, and More</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27758</link>
 <description>You know how sometimes you start down a particular path and things just get more interesting as you go? And you wind up spending a lot more time than you thought you would, as the problem gets deeper and more complex? And you look up, after a few weeks, and wonder where all the time went? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27758&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27758#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2508">802.11</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11982">power save mode</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3918">wireless LANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7226">WLANs</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:29:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Craig Mathias</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27758 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is there an 802.11n wireless LAN in your future?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26020</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like there&amp;#39;s an 802.11n wireless LAN is in your company&amp;#39;s future. Or is there? We asked 372 IT professionals about their plans for 802.11n and the answers were all over the map.&lt;img style=&quot;width: 150px; height: 115px&quot; src=&quot;/surveys/80211n.JPG&quot; border=&quot;2&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;2&quot; vspace=&quot;2&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; height=&quot;115&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;802.11n is currently a draft IEEE standard but it&amp;#39;s being implemented by nearly all WLAN vendors and products are certified by the Wi-Fi Alliance. The standard is expected to be ratified in early 2009. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So what are YOUR plans for 802.11n...and why? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26020&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26020#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/699">802.11n</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/59">wireless access points</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3918">wireless LANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7226">WLANs</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:44:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26020 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Virtual Wireless LANs - A Really Good Solution</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25964</link>
 <description>My friend and colleague Keith Shaw [http://www.networkworld.com/Home/kshaw.html] forwarded to me a note with the following question from a NWW reader (slightly edited here): &lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;I need to set up five different wireless networks in one building. Three need to be to be separate (three offices that can&amp;#39;t connect to each other; traffic must be encrypted), one that is open to public and one that is a backside router (open router). How would I go about doing this?&amp;quot; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25964&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25964#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3918">wireless LANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7226">WLANs</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:12:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Craig Mathias</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">25964 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Site Surveys and VoFi</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25202</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think everyone knows by now that I am not a big fan of site surveys for wireless LANs - in fact, I think they are almost always a bad idea, exchanging cheap hardware for expensive labor of doubtful value. Sure, in pathological buildings, a cursory site survey might be useful. And I like doing RF sweeps (with a spectrum analyzer) if interference is suspected. But in the vast majority of open-office installations, site surveys are a waste of time and especially money. One can always compensate for errors in coverage or capacity by simply adding a few more APs - indeed, one should always count on needing to do this whether a site survey is performed or not, because site surveys only take coverage, and not &lt;em&gt;capacity&lt;/em&gt;, into account. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25202&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25202#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9680">site survey</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9681">site surveys</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9682">voice on WLAN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3918">wireless LANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7226">WLANs</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:02:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Craig Mathias</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">25202 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Does Anyone Really Care About Benchmarks?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23218</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I spend a lot of time testing and benchmarking wireless LANs, in both individual and comparative exercises. I have always assumed that some form of testing and evaluation is a prerequisite for any major network-equipment purchase, and an enterprise-class, mission-critical WLAN certainly qualifies as major. As I&amp;#39;ve mentioned before, the fundamental costs and challenges inherent in large-scale WLAN testing provide significant motivation to find an alternative to this activity. But these also raise another question - looking ahead, will benchmarking itself remain important? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23218&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23218#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4330">benchmarks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8164">Veriwave</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3918">wireless LANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7226">WLANs</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:03:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Craig Mathias</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23218 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Six Big Wireless Arguments</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21923</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/community/user/1100&quot;&gt;Jeff Caruso&lt;/a&gt;, who is the Site Editor for Network World and who mysteriously allows me to post stuff here without his seeing it first, asked me to take a look at a recent article from &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/supp/2007/102607-50-greatest-arguments.html&quot;&gt;NWW&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; on the 50 greatest arguments in networking. Six of these pertain to mobile and wireless, and here are a few thoughts for your consideration: &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21923&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21923#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2256">3G</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7298">access points</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/309">BlackBerry</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2995">CDMA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/208">GSM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7299">LANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7297">mobile device ownership</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5124">municipal Wi-Fi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/386">Palm</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7226">WLANs</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:59:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Craig Mathias</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21923 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WLANs for SME: Bandspeed&#039;s Back</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21835</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s a little misleading, perhaps, since Bandspeed never went away. But this is a company that has changed direction significantly and may now in fact be on a very profitable course indeed. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21835&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21835#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7228">Bandspeed</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/810">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7227">SME</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7226">WLANs</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:17:05 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Craig Mathias</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21835 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
