<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>VoIP security</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7321</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Please hold your call is being transferred to a phreak...(the insecurity of voice)</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29609</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkingproblemmanagement.blogspot.com/search/label/Information%20security&quot;&gt;&lt;img id=&quot;BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5219522287021184178&quot; style=&quot;margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right;&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://bp3.blogger.com/_AVODjjM-COk/SG933ach1LI/AAAAAAAAGp4/YcXgrK9n9R8/s200/Phone.JPG&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;Information security&lt;/a&gt; largely focuses on data communications, and voice is often ignored. Every successful hack or extortion has a phone involved somewhere in the process, but in most cases the phone is a silent and overlooked component in the forensics. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29609&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29609#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13435">phreaks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7321">VoIP security</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:45:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ronaldxbartels</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29609 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco Security: patches now available for Cisco VoIP holes</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29366</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/community/?q=node/29284&quot;&gt;As expected, &lt;/a&gt;Cisco Security on Wednesday &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20080625-cucm.shtml.&quot;&gt;announced software updates to fix two holes&lt;/a&gt; in its VoIP prodcuts. The Cisco &lt;img style=&quot;width: 66px; height: 66px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/2008/sec-tools-E-100x100.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;66&quot; height=&quot;66&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;Unified Communications Manager (CUCM), formerly Cisco CallManager, contains a vulnerability in the Computer Telephony Integration (CTI) Manager service that may allow a denial-of-service attack. Also, Cisco&amp;#39;s Real-Time Information Server (RIS) Data Collector contains an authentication bypass hole that may expose information that is useful for hackers to mount other attacks. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29366&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29366#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4172">Cisco CallManager</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6948">Cisco Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8713">Cisco security alert</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3980">Cisco Unified Communications Manager</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9533">DOS attack</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7321">VoIP security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:40:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29366 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco VoIP vulnerabilities revealed today</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29284</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Cisco’s VoIP customers need to pay attention to its expected announcement today that its call server software has vulnerabilities. The VoIP security company VoIPshield says Cisco gear and &lt;img style=&quot;width: 66px; height: 66px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/2008/sec-tools-E-100x100.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;66&quot; height=&quot;66&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;that of its two chief rivals, Avaya and Nortel, have vulnerabilities that leave their systems open to a range of attacks. Cisco has been told about the vulnerabilities and may have fixes for them today, but that is not clear. VoIPshield says one of the three companies will just issue an advisory about its flaws but not fixes. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29284&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29284#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6948">Cisco Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12578">Cisco VoIP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7321">VoIP security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13231">VoIPshield</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:05:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29284 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>voip-vulnerabilities</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29290</link>
 <description>Can&#039;t the session-border-controllers of these systems help to monitor and eliminate these threats?</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29290#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7321">VoIP security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:03:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29290 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>VOIP and e-mail are not that different in their evolution</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28840</link>
 <description>Both should be presumed &quot;unsecured&quot; and to be used for non-essential communications until they bring to bear trunking switching within an ATM Backframe which can be electronically secured, and &quot;twisted off&quot; by voltage leak sniffing.

Just like the Navy says, &quot;Keep it simple, stupid!&quot; Assume that you are being heard...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28840#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7321">VoIP security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:00:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28840 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Block Skype in the first place ...</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26320</link>
 <description>Why allowing a risky VoIP software to exist in your network in the first place. IM vendors should block messages that contains URL&#039;s. This is a more secure way to defend against malicious links. 

http://extremesecurity.blogspot.com</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26320#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/81">Skype</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7321">VoIP security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:52:53 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>xmachine</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26320 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>unified communications</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26287</link>
 <description>Without a secure encryption method and security it will expose all to what is crippling the net today only at a larger scale</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26287#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7321">VoIP security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:25:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26287 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: VoIP vulnerabilities increasing, but not exploits</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23401</link>
 <description>The number of known vulnerabilities is bound to increase as IT managers continue to stuff more and more crap technology into their networks. The bigger problem however lies in the increasing number of threats regularly occurring on their networks. Too much dependency is placed on technology to keep their networks operating in a safe and compliant fashion, and they abdicate responsibility for actually knowing what&#039;s going on. Security controls, alarm thresholds and event management all use well-defined criteria to alert someone of a problem. But what about all the conditions leading up to and just below these points? Don&#039;t these conditions warrant attention? How does waiting for the event to occur help matters? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23401&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23401#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7321">VoIP security</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:57:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>meatpieandtatters</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23401 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>VoIP Security Lessons Microsoft OCS Can Learn From Vonage and Others</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22541</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;float: right&quot; src=&quot;http://mitchellashley.typepad.com/the_converging_network/images/Ike_Elliott.png&quot; alt=&quot;Ike Elliott - Telecosm blogger&quot; width=&quot;90&quot; height=&quot;110&quot; /&gt;While VoIP is all the rage, VoIP security is often underplayed and frequently goes unaddressed. Not by telecom industry expert, Ike Elliott. A long time colleague and friend of mine, Ike led the creation of the first &amp;quot;soft switch&amp;quot; back in the late 1990&amp;#39;s, a software-based phone switch running on a Sun server. What Ike pioneered, we today commonly think of as VoIP in products like Microsoft&amp;#39;s Office Communication Server, the Asterisk open source VoIP server and many others.   &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22541&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22541#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7709">Ike Elliott</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7710">Microsoft OCS 2007</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7321">VoIP security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7708">VoIP spoofing attacks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/265">Vonage</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 03:03:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22541 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: VoIP security industry: Guilty as charged</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21934</link>
 <description>Nice job with the nasy questions.  There are so many more to ask that I humbly suggest the comments section here to include more.

Here&#039;s number 11 from me:

Explain how your security advisory team works and proactively alerts customers and the public of weaknesses in your VoIP gear.

Best,
--scm</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21934#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7321">VoIP security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:41:02 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21934 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
