<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>LTE</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7520</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>True Broadband is Coming For Business</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29233</link>
 <description>Whether it&#039;s in a year or two, whether it&#039;s WiMax or LTE, true broadband is coming to enteprises.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.tmcnet.com/the-hyperconnected-enterprise/mobility/lte-wimax-for-incumbent-carriers.asp&quot;&gt;blog.tmcnet.com...lte-wimax-for-incumbent-carriers.asp&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29233#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7520">LTE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/197">WiMax</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:00:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29233 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nortel picked LTE because they were DE-SELECTED from WiMax</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28848</link>
 <description>The WiMax biz went to Motorola, Samsung and Nokia....Nortel was never even a player.  Boo-hoo....

www.networkworld.com/news/2007/032706-should-nortel-exit.html

They are also in bed with Verizon and will support anything they do.....like tell the world WiMax is bad, LTE is good, to further Verizon&#039;s business agenda.

What they don&#039;t tell you is that the carriers (Verizon, AT&amp;T) fear WiMax because it will be an OPEN standard.  This is why Google is behind it and Verizon is not.  Verizon wants a &quot;locked down&quot; market where all devices are controled by Verizon.  Clearwire &amp; Google want an open market and don&#039;t care......just login to the WiMax network with whatever divice and pay a fee for usage of the network and Google gets the portal and eyeballs for their ads.
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28848&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28848#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7520">LTE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1098">Nortel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/147">Verizon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/197">WiMax</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:33:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28848 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WIMAX and LTE- Lean towards the rainbow on the Horizon!</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28799</link>
 <description>WiMAX and LTE

One of the most common issues of discussion one finds today in either WiMAX or 3G fora are the technology growth path, will it be LTE or Mobile WiMAX? In fact this question has also led to a considerable debate amongst the regulators in different countries as it has a bearing on the way future resources such as spectrum need to be allocated.
It must be said at the outset  that the LTE is the path most carriers ( 3G and CDMA) are planning to follow for the present, at least till they can see something better in Mobile WiMAX. All the carriers have been following the 3GPP ( and 3GPP2) upgrade paths, which now at HSUPA and EV-DO will take them to LTE and UMB.
  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28799&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28799#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7520">LTE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/197">WiMax</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:19:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Amitabh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28799 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>LTE -  Theory and Promise = vaporware today</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28322</link>
 <description>It never ceases to amaze me how some companies will tout a product as the be all and end all of a market, the absolutely gotta have item, and yet you cannot buy the product today. It is a shell game. Yes, it looks good. Yes, it has great potential. But do you honestly believe that the competition is simply going to roll over, give up or cry uncle when it already has an extremely reliable and viable product already in the marketplace and almost two years to tweak it? This is clearly a page torn from the Microsoft Business Plan. Yet another example of using the easily convinced, uneducated public to drive up demand before a product has been released. It&#039;s just shameful.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28322#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/206">carriers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7520">LTE</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:29:26 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28322 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Full Speed Ahead for US WiMAX</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27575</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/24287&quot;&gt;As I first noted back in January&lt;/a&gt;, Sprint is in fact now officially spinning off its WiMAX project as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://newsreleases.sprint.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=127149&amp;amp;p=irol-newsArticle_newsroom&amp;amp;ID=1141088&quot;&gt;joint venture&lt;/a&gt; with Clearwire (and that&amp;#39;s the name of the new company), Comcast, Time-Warner, Intel, Google (that&amp;#39;s interesting) and others. This should given the new company enough money to build out many US markets, so WiMAX really is coming to town, perhaps in 2010. Note that LTE should appear around the same time, so any talk of WiMAX having a lead in time-to-market should at this point be moot. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27575&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27575#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7195">ClearWire</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/974">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7520">LTE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/301">Sprint</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7194">Time Warner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/197">WiMax</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:04:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Craig Mathias</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27575 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>LTE vs. WiMAX - A Contest or Not?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26632</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Nokia&amp;#39;s announcement of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nseries.com/index.html#l=home&quot;&gt;WiMAX version of the N810&lt;/a&gt; this week at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ctiawireless.com/&quot;&gt;CTIA show in Las Vegas&lt;/a&gt; lifted the curtain on yet another poorly-kept secret. Rumored for some time, the Internet Tablet WiMAX Edition is pretty much an N810 with a WiMAX radio added. As I&amp;#39;ve noted before, I really like the N810 (the version without WiMAX; I&amp;#39;ve not tried the new one), and I expect it to do well - once there&amp;#39;s a US WiMAX network to run it on. In the meantime, BTW, the WiMAX N810 also has Wi-Fi and GPS - enough to keep you busy until service comes to your neighborhood. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26632&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26632#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9678">Ericsson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7520">LTE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10956">Nokia N810 WiMAX Edition</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/197">WiMax</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 07:45:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Craig Mathias</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26632 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco working with two carriers to test content delivery platform supporting wired and wireless devices</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23736</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Unstrung - the news Web site that was the first to &lt;a href=&quot;/community/?q=node/20618 &quot;&gt;publish speculation&lt;/a&gt; that Cisco was eyeing up WiMAX base station vendor &lt;img style=&quot;width: 87px; height: 59px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/wireless-tower.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;87&quot; height=&quot;59&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; Navini for purchase - is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unstrung.com/document.asp?doc_id=142883&amp;amp;f_src=unstrung_gnews&quot;&gt;now reporting&lt;/a&gt; that Cisco is working with one North American and one international Tier-1 operator to test a &amp;quot;network delivery system that can push applications and content over &amp;#39;any network&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;any device&amp;#39; - wired or wireless.&amp;quot; Details are sparse as to what the technology involves and who the partners are, but Unstrung reports that the system is &amp;quot;intende &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23736&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23736#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5413">4G</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/206">carriers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6282">femtocell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7520">LTE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6392">Navini</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1407">Scientific-Atlanta</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3087">service providers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6093">wired</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/52">wireless</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:18:26 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23736 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Verizon Goes with LTE</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22467</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Tired of stories about Verizon yet?  It&amp;#39;s a sign of a well-run company that they manage their PR in such a way so as to continually attract as much attention as possible. First it was openness for devices and networks, and now it&amp;#39;s their selection of the 3GPP&amp;#39;s Long Term Evolution (LTE) (new name still needed here) technology as their &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.vzw.com/news/2007/11/pr2007-11-29.html&quot;&gt;4G direction&lt;/a&gt;. This news was not all that unexpected - Vodaphone, the other owner (45%) of Verizon Wireless, is a GSM/UMTS carrier and will obviously go with LTE. And CDMA is on the way out as the basis for future broadband technologies anyway, to be replaced by OFDM, the basis of LTE (and many others). &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22467&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22467#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2995">CDMA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7519">HSPA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7520">LTE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/686">Qualcomm</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/478">Verizon Wireless</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7677">WiMAC</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:48:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Craig Mathias</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22467 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why There Will Be No Single Wireless Broadband Technology</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22243</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One of the great frustrations for many of us is having a wireless device but, in a given location and at a given moment in time, no connectivity - especially while others around you are merrily e-mailing away. Why can&amp;#39;t we have just one big wireless network, you lament, based on one Great and Powerful wireless technology? Do we really need UMTS, CDMA2000, and WiMAX, diluting investment and coverage? Well, the challenge with having a single Great and Powerful wireless technology has its roots in the formerly powerful, if not so great, Soviet Union, and that is my topic for today. Wireless and communism - together at last. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22243&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22243#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7519">HSPA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7520">LTE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7521">UMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1079">UMTS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/197">WiMax</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7518">wireless broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:30:39 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Craig Mathias</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22243 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
