<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>IP PBX</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft ResponsePoint&#039;s Future</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33495</link>
 <description>Have you heard of Microsoft ResponsePoint?  Ironically, not many people really have.  ResponsePoint is Microsoft&#039;s new SMB-focused IP phone system appliance.  With hardware vendor support from a wide variety of companies, including D-Link, Quanta, and Aastra, there are multiple choices for the hardware side of the system.  

ResponsePoint has had a mildly slow &quot;take-off&quot; into the market, but it will be a product to watch.  What could potentially hamper RP?  First, Microsoft will need to show continued commitment to the product.  Recently, Service Pack 1 was announced, so the development lifecycle of the product is indeed continuing.  Secondly, the actual user experience of the product focuses on voice recognition.  Time will tell as to whether this will be a time-tested implementation of a user interface.  

Scalability of RP seems to be a chief concern among users.  The system will likely not scale above the 10-12 line (analog) environment (with multiple appliances), with no PRI support on the way.  This is definitely a small business product.  However, other vendors are offering appliances with more features and more scalability options at the same relative price point.  

The future of ResponsePoint is unknown.  It will be interesting to see whether some of the intuitive voice recognition features make it into the  mainstream releases of Microsoft OCS, however, time will tell.

For more information about Microsoft ResponsePoint, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/responsepoint/&quot;&gt;visit this site&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33495#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/154">Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9679">Aastra</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/476">D-Link</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/812">IP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16547">line</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3597">phone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14059">phone system</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3659">PRI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16546">Quanta</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16545">ResponsePoint</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/810">SMB</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 08:42:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matthew Nickasch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33495 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shoretel</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33224</link>
 <description>Ok I can see all of the vendors but Shoretel....How do they fit into the picture with these other vendors. I believe they do not fit...In fact not even close. They have a nice platform with great management but they are not a UC player of any significance. You should have included Siemens as they have made there way back to the leaders quadrant in Gartner MQ for both telephony and UC. They have in fact led the way for embedding communications into business processes to the point that IBM uses their offering as middleware to communicate with other vendors in the telephony space. Cisco and Microsoft entered the market with the same mantra about being open but have always been about gettiing more of the customers mindshare with their offering and crushing competition in the process.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33224#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7033">ShoreTel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1258">unified communications</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:03:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33224 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Polycom Continues SIP Endpoint Success</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33169</link>
 <description>Sometime in your life, you have likely used a Polycom telephone or video conferencing system.  Once known for their conferencing systems, Polycom expanded into high-fidelity teleconferencing products, and has now proven themselves in the field of IP telephones.

Especially in the SIP-centric IP-PBX market, Polycom has made a significant statement.  The SoundPoint IP series has become the &#039;de-facto standard&#039; for many IP-PBX and UC system vendors.  With Digium|Switchvox, Fonality, and many other IP Centrex providers supporting the SoundPoint IP series, interoperability is definitely present with Polycom&#039;s products from platform to platform.  

What has made Polycom especially successful in the SIP endpoint market?  In my opinion, there are a few key factors to the success of any endpoint.  

First, &lt;strong&gt;hardware build quality&lt;/strong&gt; is extremely important.  There are simply a lot of &#039;junk&#039; devices out there that only add confusion and a poor end user experience.  Sure, these devices may cost less in the short-term, but will likely add exponentially to that cost through user frustration and hardware failure.

Second, &lt;strong&gt;configurability and centralized provisioning&lt;/strong&gt; is essential.  The entire SoundPoint IP series offers extremely flexible provisioning through TFTP, HTTP, or FTP, and also rapid deployment through this boot-server model.  Many UC server and IP-PBX vendors require control over the minute details in any endpoint in order to seamlessly provide an advanced feature set to the user.  Polycom&#039;s endpoint configuration files are indeed very detailed and long, but offer granular control over even the smallest details.
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33169&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33169#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2430">Conference</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8929">Digium</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2335">endpoint</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8930">Fonality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16342">IP Centrex</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3597">phone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2316">Polycom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/499">SIP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16341">SoundPoint</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16340">SoundPoint IP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11182">Switchvox</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/196">video</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:51:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matthew Nickasch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33169 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mobility, not Unified Communications, top priority for businesses</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28966</link>
 <description>This post originally found at http://accentservices.blogspot.com

Unified Communications (UC) is getting a lot of publicity in the tech media these days. But the big push by manufacturers to integrate chat and presence with existing communication systems may not drive sales as much as initially expected.
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28966&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28966#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12530">business phone system</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/659">cellular</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/275">Mobility</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12531">ShoreTel 8</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1117">technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/803">telephony</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12532">teleworking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12533">unified communication</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/220">VoIP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/52">wireless</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:12:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Cameron</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28966 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco: the IP PBX of choice?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28816</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Almost two thirds of the 2,187 North American and European companies surveyed choose a Cisco IP PBX in their VoIP deployments, Forrester Research &lt;img style=&quot;width: 66px; height: 66px&quot; src=&quot;/Micronet%20images/Cisco-IP-phone-7970.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;66&quot; height=&quot;66&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;found. These results and more are &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/061308-unified-communications-value-unclear-forrester.html&quot;&gt;from a study on SMB and enterprise networking plans for 2008&lt;/a&gt;. Forrester conducted the research in the first quarter. Forrester found that over half of its respondents will roll out or evaluate IP PBX and site-to-site WAN VoIP options in 2008. Out of those rolling out or evaluating IP PBX, 65% are interested in procuring VoIP as a managed service.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28816&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28816#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12357">study</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/220">VoIP</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:50:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28816 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Digium|Switchvox Breaks the Appliance Barrier</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28576</link>
 <description>There are many reasons to get excited about the future of IP telephony.  For me, it&#039;s the development and release of new products that will revolutionize the industry.  After a recent blog post (Appliances Run Amok) on the emerging market of VoIP &amp; IP-PBX appliances, it appears that Digium, &quot;The Asterisk Company&quot;, is pulling ahead of the competition with their recently updated Switchvox appliance line.
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28576&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28576#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12713">AA300</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12711">appliance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1110">Avaya</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11031">BCM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2270">call manager</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8929">Digium</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12712">IP Office</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1098">Nortel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3539">PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11182">Switchvox</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/220">VoIP</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:26:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matthew Nickasch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28576 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ShoreTel 8 demo video</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28356</link>
 <description>ShoreTel has posted a ShoreTel 8 demo video on YouTube and you can view it on &lt;a href=&quot;http://accentservices.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Accent&#039;s Tech Blog&lt;/a&gt;. You can check out the video in the left hand column of the blog.

We will keep the video up for a while so everyone has a chance to view it. The demo is only about 9 minutes long and showcases ShoreTel&#039;s newest features including video conferencing, presence and chat at the user desktop.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28356#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12528">Accent</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12529">business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12530">business phone system</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12216">IP video</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/275">Mobility</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2323">network</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12531">ShoreTel 8</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1117">technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12532">teleworking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12533">unified communication</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1966">Video Conferencing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/220">VoIP</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:33:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Cameron</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28356 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>pbx solution</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27817</link>
 <description>as long as carrier - telcos able to upgrade their centrex solution latest, secondly provide best and prompt cust. care &amp; fault resolution, CENTREX can be better model over IP PBX or PBX for that matter.
- Sushil

(Openion is my personal openion. I am working in Reliance Communications as Product Manager)</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27817#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:55:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27817 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft leading Cisco on unified communications</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27245</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft and Cisco are neck-in-neck in their battle over unified communications with Microsoft eeking out a tiny lead among&lt;img src=&quot;/Micronet%20images/voip%20image.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;59&quot; height=&quot;52&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; companies that have already implemented unified messaging. So finds a study from &lt;a href=&quot;/community/www.infonetics.com&quot;&gt;Infonetics Research&lt;/a&gt;. The study investigated Avaya, Cisco, IBM, Microsoft, and Nortel. Cisco rated high on reliability but low on pricing. Microsoft rated high on  financial stability but low on reliability. Almost all vendors were given a  thump on the head over interoperability -- indicating that this area could use  some serious improvements before UC will be adopted by the masses. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27245&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27245#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3445">infonetics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5944">UC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1258">unified communications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/220">VoIP</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:10:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27245 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft is slightly leading Cisco on UC products but the whole market needs interoperability</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27244</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/community/www.infonetics.com&quot;&gt;Infonetics Research&lt;/a&gt; recently completed a survey of 80 North American companies that had implemented unified messaging to see what plans they had to&lt;img style=&quot;width: 76px; height: 86px&quot; src=&quot;/Micronet images/star-treck-communicator.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;76&quot; height=&quot;86&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; go for the whole enchilada and rollout unified communications. The study found that the market is in the midst of a battle of the titans, with Cisco and Microsoft fighting for the lead and Microsoft slightly ahead. The study, &amp;quot;User Plans for Unified Communications: North America 2008,&amp;quot; attempts to determine the market potential and product requirements. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27244&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27244#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3445">infonetics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5944">UC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1258">unified communications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/220">VoIP</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:54:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27244 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Appliances Run Amok!</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25408</link>
 <description>The market for Asterisk-based IP-PBX appliances has grown significantly in the last three years.  We&#039;re seeing appliance-type systems from all sorts of large and small vendors alike.  From Digium&#039;s Asterisk Appliance, to the Trixbox Appliance, Fonality&#039;s PBXtra, the Switchvox appliance... the list goes on and on.  Each device has a custom-developed GUI that usually all ties back to the same Asterisk code on the backend.  What these appliances do provide however, is usually a support contract or point-of-contact in case things go horribly wrong.
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25408&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25408#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/317">Asterisk</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8929">Digium</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8930">Fonality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9848">Trixbox</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/220">VoIP</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:09:52 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matthew Nickasch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">25408 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Digium adds new warranties to Asterisk IP PBX gear</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24958</link>
 <description>Funny, their finally meeting the standard Sangoma has had in place for years! Sangoma leads, Digium follows.   </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24958#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/317">Asterisk</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8929">Digium</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9460">Sangoma</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:39:26 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24958 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: IP phones, bandwidth needs forcing LAN switch shift</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24798</link>
 <description>For our company the higher reliability of a chassis (dual suupervisors and dual power supplies) switch for 5 nines availability is a big factor replacing our very reliable legacy PBX&#039;s.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24798#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1081">switches</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:26:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24798 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Asterisk plans higher-spec IP PBX, snaps at Cisco&#039;s heels</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24318</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The open source Asterisk PBX platform has been around for nine years and is snapping at Cisco&amp;#39;s heels in the VoIP space. Having enjoyed success as an attractive alternative to pricey IP PBX &lt;img style=&quot;width: 88px; height: 54px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/asterisk.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;88&quot; height=&quot;54&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; systems, there is now a spate of commercial vendors that charge for Asterisk professional services, peripherals and software extensions. (Dell reseller Fonality is one of them. See these recent Cisco Subnet blog posts about this vendor: &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/24277&quot;&gt;Cisco vs. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24318&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24318#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/317">Asterisk</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1234">convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8929">Digium</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8930">Fonality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/260">open source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/220">VoIP</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:20:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24318 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Surprise to Cisco? 2008 Technology of the Year Awards: Best IP PBX Asterisk 1.4</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24235</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: &#039;Arial&#039;,&#039;sans-serif&#039;&quot;&gt;I wondering if Cisco found this as a surprise? I have installed this IP PBX for many companies and have used Cisco SIP Phones. With this news and award it would not be a surprise if Cisco purchased the software and took it off the market as open source.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 7.5pt; font-family: &#039;Verdana&#039;,&#039;sans-serif&#039;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: &#039;Arial&#039;,&#039;sans-serif&#039;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: &#039;Arial&#039;,&#039;sans-serif&#039;&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;InfoWorld 2008 Technology of the Year Awards: Best IP PBX Asterisk 1.4&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 7.5pt; font-family: &#039;Verdana&#039;,&#039;sans-serif&#039;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24235&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24235#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8814">Larry Chaffin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8815">Pluto Networks</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:06:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Larry Chaffin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24235 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IP PBX</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23562</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An IP PBX is a private branch exchange, or telephone switching system, that routes calls over an IP network for internal users and provides access to outside lines. Typically, an IP PBX also switches calls between VoIP users and callers on traditional telephone systems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One main advantage of an IP PBX is that it eliminates the need for a separate voice network, instead converging voice and data traffic on the same network. The flexibility provided by one line for each user&#039;s data and voice access makes it easier for enterprises to add users and can reduce long-term operational and maintenance costs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IP PBXes, which are usually software packages running on a server or dedicated appliances, have a variety of features for managing calls. Some of them are voice-menu systems, call conferencing, click-to-call, call logging and tracking, voice mail and call forwarding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Companies can decide to use softphones, software-only implementations of IP phones that run on users&#039; desktops, or traditional desktop phone sets that have been designed to work over IP networks. Proprietary IP phones made by the same vendor that makes an IP PBX limit interoperability but can also take advantage of the PBX&#039;s features to a greater degree than standards-based IP phones.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Additional resources&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/buyersguides/guide.php?cat=877966&quot;&gt;IP PBX Software Buyer&#039;s Guide&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/topics/ip-pbx.html&quot;&gt;Network World IP PBX Research Center&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23562#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5519">I</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:25:06 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Inbox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23562 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Gates says voice software spells death of PBX</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20679</link>
 <description>Gates says ...   and nobody listens...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20679#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:36:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20679 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What’ll be hot in 2008? Virtualization, high-speed server fabrics and unified communications that&#039;s what</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20409</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Verdana&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;I guess it’s not too early to start predicting what’ll be burning up the technology ropes in 2008. Every year at its annual Garter Symposium/ITXPO, analysts from the company impart some interesting and useful information.&lt;span&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;One of the highlights is Gartner’s take on what’ll be hot for the coming year.&lt;span&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;The list for 2008 includes more unified communications and server virtualization technolgy.&lt;span&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;High-speed server communications will also be on tap. &lt;span&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Verdana&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20409&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20409#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/993">Gartner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6243">server fabics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/182">virtualization</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:28:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Layer 8</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20409 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco ships 12 million unified IP phones</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/16244</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2007/prod_061407c.html&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/cisco-airbus.jpg&quot; width=&quot;460&quot; height=&quot;304&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Cisco ships 12 million unified IP phones&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;Shipping our &lt;a href=&quot;http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2007/prod_061407c.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;12 millionth Unified IP Phone to Airbus&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; highlights the speed at which &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/products_promotion0900aecd80402f55.html&quot;&gt;Cisco Unified Communications&lt;/a&gt; is being adopted and the benefits it brings to customers,&quot; said &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/chris-dedicoat-biography.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Chris Dedicoat&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/chris-dedicoat-biography.pdf&quot;&gt;biography&lt;/a&gt;), President, European Markets, Cisco.

&lt;table width=&quot;460&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td  valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/chris-dedicoat-biography.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/chris-dedicoat.jpg&quot; width=&quot;260&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; hspace=&quot;10&quot; height=&quot;345&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Chris Dedicoat&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Furthermore, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/chris-dedicoat-biography.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Chris Dedicoat&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;The system deployed by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.airbus.com/en/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Airbus&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; will help it meet the communication needs of a growing business, reduce costs and encourage collaborative working, which will help increase the productivity of its employees.&quot;

With an annual turnover of around 26 billion euros in 2006, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.airbus.com/en/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Airbus&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has delivered over 4,500 aircraft to more than 250 customers worldwide and boasts a healthy order book in excess of 2,500 aircraft for delivery.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.airbus.com/en/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Airbus&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has migrated from a traditional private branch exchange (PBX) system to a fully IP-based telephony system, with 30,000 extensions in France and 10,000 extensions in the UK. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.airbus.com/en/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Airbus&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is using &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/index.html&quot;&gt;Cisco Unified Communications Manager&lt;/a&gt; call-processing software to cover all sites. 

The contract to implement and manage Airbus&#039; IP Communication over a five-year period was signed in 2005 by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.orange-business.com/us/index.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Orange Business Services&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the communications service operator and integrator that represents the business communications solutions and services provided by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.francetelecom.com/en/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;France Telecom Group&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/products_promotion0900aecd80402f55.html&quot;&gt;Cisco Unified Communications&lt;/a&gt; is helping Airbus extend consistent communication services to all employees working at Airbus campus locations in France and the UK. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.orange-business.com/us/index.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Orange Business Services&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; took just nine months to install the central architecture following initial configuration and planning. 

In order to support 45,000 employees, the solution was rolled out at a rate of up to 600 phones a day, highlighting the speed and ease with which &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/products_promotion0900aecd80402f55.html&quot;&gt;Cisco Unified Communications&lt;/a&gt; can be implemented.

&quot;Effective communication systems that encourage collaboration between employees and help improve company efficiency are essential in helping us respond to growing customer demands,&quot; said &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.airbus.com/en/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Robert Louge&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, head of IT Projects, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.airbus.com/en/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Airbus&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. 

&quot;Cisco&#039;s solution has helped us improve communications, reduce our spending by simplifying our communications infrastructure and allowed us to make a quick and simple transition to an IP-based Unified Communications platform.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infonetics.com/resources/purple.shtml?ms07.pbx.1q07.nr.shtml&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Infonetics Research&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; reported earlier this month that Cisco has been enjoying increasing success in the enterprise telephony market.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infonetics.com/resources/purple.shtml?ms07.pbx.1q07.nr.shtml&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/infonetics-chart.gif&quot; width=&quot;460&quot; height=&quot;283&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Worldwide PBX/KTS System Revenue Forecast&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;table width=&quot;460&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td  valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infonetics.com/resources/purple.shtml?ms07.pbx.1q07.nr.shtml&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/matthias-machowinski.jpg&quot; width=&quot;260&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; hspace=&quot;10&quot; height=&quot;370&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Matthias Machowinski&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&quot;A number of important developments are sure to inject a jolt or two of excitement into the enterprise telephony market this year,&quot; said &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infonetics.com/resources/purple.shtml?ms07.pbx.1q07.nr.shtml&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Matthias Machowinski&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, Directing Analyst, Enterprise Voice &amp; Data at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infonetics.com/resources/purple.shtml?ms07.pbx.1q07.nr.shtml&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Infonetics Research&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;Microsoft is launching &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/uc/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;OCS 2007&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (their unified communications product), and the question on everybody’s mind is what’s the market impact? Will buyers abandon their PBXs in favor of a pure unified communications solution? We don’t think so, at least for the short term.&quot;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

In a telephone interview today, Machowinski reported that in North America, Cisco is the market share leader for IP PBX revenue in 1Q07, followed closely by Avaya and Nortel (Avaya leads worldwide).

Furthermore, Cisco maintains a strong lead in IP deskphone and IP softphone sales, accounting for almost half the units shipped worldwide in 1Q07.

Related news: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infonetics.com/resources/purple.shtml?ms07.pbx.1q07.nr.shtml&quot;&gt;2007 heating up to an interesting year for enterprise telephony&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/brad-reese.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/brad-signature.gif&quot; width=&quot;111&quot; height=&quot;47&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Brad Reese Profile&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.BradReese.Com/&quot;&gt;http://www.BradReese.Com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/16244&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/16244#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3571">Airbus</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1110">Avaya</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3572">Chris Dedicoat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1562">cisco systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3564">Enterprise Telephony</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2503">hybrid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3569">Infonetics Research</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1111">IP phones</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3560">KTS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3567">Matthias Machowinski</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3566">Microsoft OCS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1098">Nortel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3539">PBX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3562">Pure IP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3565">Robert Louge</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3561">TDM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3568">Unified IP Phones</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/31">Wide Area Networks</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:17:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brad Reese</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">16244 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Where&#039;s Trixbox in your review?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/13641</link>
 <description> &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/13641&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/13641#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/755">IP PBX</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:36:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">13641 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
