<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>phishing</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>How phishers think, act and make a profit</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30944</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Cisco Security Expert blogger Jamey Heary has a &lt;a href=&quot;/community/node/30822&quot;&gt;brief write-up&lt;/a&gt; of an excellent session at Black Hat late &lt;img style=&quot;width: 88px; height: 72px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/hacker.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;88&quot; height=&quot;72&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;last week that detailed how phishers think, act, and make a profit. Phishers don&amp;#39;t protect their stolen data and so it&amp;#39;s quite easy to figure out where they&amp;#39;ve stored their stash. Talk about hacking the hackers. Also, read about a new DNS cache poisoning trick in Jamey&amp;#39;s blog.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30944&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30944#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/127">Black Hat</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/204">hackers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/567">scams</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:10:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30944 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Phishers with a sense of humor?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30390</link>
 <description>I just got some phish that would have me entering my PayPal info at pwned.ca.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30390#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:24:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Gaffin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30390 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Opera 9 Vs Firefox 3: Anti-phishing review</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29541</link>
 <description>I&#039;ve to admit that Opera 9 is better than FF3 when it comes to phishing filtering. The outcomes of my review are surprising... you can check them by yourself &lt;a href=&quot;http://extremesecurity.blogspot.com/2008/06/firefox-vs-opera-anti-phishing-review_30.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29541#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/86">FireFox</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7852">Opera</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/85">web browsers</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:57:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>xmachine</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29541 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It is weird..</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28543</link>
 <description>&quot;Normal&quot; people but executives? Maybe I know wrong kind of executives but (anytime) when they get mail, e-mail, whatever which has any legal, contractual, etc problems, they tell the secretary to contact the lawyers (or other specialists) and thank you, what&#039;s next on my plate today? Assuming that the secretary who filters for them even bothers them with something as that before it is processed by or with specialists?
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28543&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28543#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:01:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tuomoks</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28543 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Spear Phishing Scams</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28132</link>
 <description>OK, so just how long does it take to determine the IP address to which the collected information is being sent, find the physical address that is associated with the IP address, arrest the perps and shut it down?  Sheesh!  </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28132#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 11:04:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28132 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>i doubt it is because they think young people are nieve about giving out their information...</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28021</link>
 <description>i doubt it is because they think young people are naive about giving out their information.

it is probably just another target since itunes has a larger install base than say one particular bank

</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28021#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/82">Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/660">iTunes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:01:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28021 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>You&#039;d think folks would be sharper than to reply, but</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27744</link>
 <description>My own experience here has shown that despite warnings from IS, despite poorly written and harsh toned phishing emails, some folks are eagerly awaiting the opportunity to give out their personal information at the drop of a dime.  Yet we can&#039;t get them to close out of applications when they go home when we ask them to.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27744#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 10:06:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27744 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Networks get used for anything they can do...</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27454</link>
 <description>Like any other network, Storm is merely a tool. Granted, that tool was used mostly to build itself, but it can now be used for anything any other network can be used for.

Cracking encrypted files.
Assembling databases of anything, such as:

CAPTCHA images and their associated responses.

Data on people to such as, what they own, when &amp; where they vacation, etc. For whatever use, direct theft, extortion, kidnapping, murder....

Remember that a huge net is a supercomputer, and that such a use of compromised machines may not leave any tracks of damage--it can be used for anything--if it&#039;s just used to crunch numbers or collect public data or similar work, then it will remain unseen.

If the results of such crunching are used for a single purpose, there may never be any traces.
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27454&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27454#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11703">Storm</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:29:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27454 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mobile Browsers Aid Phishing Scams</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27085</link>
 <description>Are mobile devices to become the bastion of phishing identity theft attacks? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27085&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27085#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11285">Byron Acohido</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1188">iPhone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11286">Jon Swartz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11283">mobile device browser</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11282">Safari web browser</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11281">University of California Davis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11284">USAToday</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7571">Wii</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11287">Zero Day Threat</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:41:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mitchell Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27085 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>25 leading-edge IT research projects</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27057</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;first&quot;&gt;While universities don&amp;#39;t tend to shout as loudly about their latest tech innovations as do Google, Cisco and other big vendors,    their results are no less impressive in what they could mean for faster, more secure and more useful networking. Here&amp;#39;s a    roundup, in no particular order, of some of the most amazing and colorful projects in the works. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1. Exploiting T-rays&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27057&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27057#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5170">Berkeley</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1447">Carnegie Mellon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5975">CMU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9592">Georgia Tech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2503">hybrid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/653">MIT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1348">Penn State</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/269">RFID</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11266">stevens institute</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3802">terrorism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3020">Twitter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11263">University of Utah</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/197">WiMax</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:51:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alpha Doggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27057 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>federal court subpoena phish</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26994</link>
 <description>It is kind of a whaling attack targeting big fishes in corporate offices like CEO&#039;s, top executives and managers.

&quot;This is one of the best phish e-mails I&#039;ve seen in the past 6 years&quot; quoted by Mr. Steve Kirsch, a well known Silicon Valley entrepreneur

Remember, that it is not legal to send subpoena via emails unless it is agreed by the people. Also All US Federal courts have URLs of the form &quot;courtname.uscourts.gov&quot; and not in the form
&quot;uscourts.com&quot; mentioned in email. So Beware of these kinds of mails. The Abaca Email Protection Gateway (http://abaca.com/) service was the only service I know that quarantined these emails.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26994#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:08:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>vicotr24</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26994 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Phishers getting trickier with working phone numbers</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26865</link>
 <description>I received what to me was an obvious phishing attempt to gain bank card information as you can see from the image below.

Normally, I just delete these but I thought it was odd that the message carried a phone number instead of trying to redirect the victim to a hacked Web site. Most anti-fraud campaigns tell people to call in rather than follow links. So, I decided to give the number a try from my office since our number doesn&#039;t show up on most Caller ID systems. This is what I heard:

&lt;p&gt;&lt;script language=&quot;JavaScript1.1&quot; src=&quot;/includes/audio/audiohome.js&quot;&gt; &lt;/script&gt;&lt;script language=&quot;JavaScript1.1&quot;&gt;
				function writeflashcode() { var srcfile = &#039;http://podcasts.networkworld.com/misc/phone.mp3&#039;; 
				 embedaudiohome(srcfile); }  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26865&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26865#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:10:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Meserve</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26865 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Given SenderID is very similar to SPF its odd that it isn&#039;t mentioned...</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26584</link>
 <description>SPF reaching %12.6[1] takeup of a large sample of domains makes it look like SenderID missed out on market dominance.

[1] http://dns.measurement-factory.com/surveys/200710.html</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26584#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10917">Sender ID</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2406">SPF</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/124">Yahoo</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 08:28:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26584 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Google finds evil all over the Web</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25176</link>
 <description>Google should warn users when they reach malicious links by denying them or at least drawing their attention by putting warning beside the results. As McAfee SiteAdvisor dose. 

ExtremeSecurity Blog Admin

http://extremesecurity.blogspot.com</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25176#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:40:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">25176 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No surprise phishers are going after tax payers</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24959</link>
 <description>Phishers are at it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/4519&quot;&gt;again&lt;/a&gt; with another round of IRS tax refund messages. Already got three of these today with a subject line of &lt;strong&gt;Tax Notification&lt;/strong&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
United States Department of the Treasury

After the last annual calculations of your fiscal activity we have determined that you are eligible to receive a tax refund of $184.80.

Please submit the tax refund request and allow us
6-9 days in order to process it.

A refund can be delayed for a variety of reasons.
For example submitting invalid records or applying after the deadline.

To access the form for your tax refund, use the following personalized link:

[URL DELETED]

Regards,
Internal Revenue Service &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24959&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24959#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/74">spam</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:48:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Meserve</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24959 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Can you use e-mail to tell people to change their passwords after a phishing attack?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24952</link>
 <description>Boston University recently had a phishing outbreak in which people on the college network were sent messages telling them to reset the passwords on their network logins. BU IT jumped right on it, took (undisclosed, natch) counter-measures and then, &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.www.dailyfreepress.com/media/storage/paper87/news/2008/02/12/News/Phishing.Scam.Quickly.Idd.By.It-3203536.shtml&quot;&gt;e-mailed  the entire campus&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The email included a link for those who gave out their information so they could change their Kerberos passwords.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But would you trust such a message?</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24952#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/158">messaging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:52:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Gaffin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24952 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Powerful new antiphishing weapon emerges</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24919</link>
 <description>spamassassin already supports this.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24919#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:13:55 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24919 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: NatWest bank heads phishing league table in the U.K.</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24678</link>
 <description>I have received a phishing attack purporting to come form Nat West, and I don&#039;t even bank with Nat West! This was in the form of a memo linking to an on-line form asking for all kinds of personal details such as Name, Address, Account Number, Log-on ID, Password, Pin Number etc. Naturally I destroyed the email. 

I prefer not to identify myself. </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24678#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:02:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24678 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Phishers use DNS tricks to direct users to bad sites</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24672</link>
 <description>The hosts file is there for backward compatibility. In a pure Win 2000/XP environment, you can safely change the attribute of this file (and your &#039;Networks&#039; file located in the same folder) to &#039;Read Only&#039;. This will help prevent writing to these files... </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24672#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/949">DNS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/501">Windows</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:40:08 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24672 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is it safe to search?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24544</link>
 <description>Over the last few months there have been increasing reports of &lt;a href=http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/012808-google-hack.html&gt;Malware&lt;/a&gt; and Phishers attacks utilizing Google to hack and spam users.  Making us twice about the links you click next time you search.  

Search engine spammers have ramped up their efforts to ensnare the unwary Google users.  In response Google removed tens of thousands of malicious Web pages from its index. 
But as quickly as Google can remove them there are thousands more ready to go up as these malicious spammers keep pumping out the pages. 
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24544&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24544#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/204">hackers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/603">malware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/76">phishing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:39:52 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chikt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24544 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
