<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>bandwidth</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/767</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Will There Be Enough Bandwidth and How Much Will It Cost?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28329</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;With the price of gasoline sky rocketing, I would imagine that many IT and &amp;quot;info&amp;quot; workers would opt to telecommute as much as possible in the coming months, particularly this summer. Having written quite a bit about VPNs over the last couple of years including Microsoft&amp;#39;s Windows Server 2008 VPN server capabilities in my latest book, I have always been partial to VPN connections to secure networks as a remote network access strategy rather than dial-up schemes that require a modem pool. The question is: will an increase use of Internet bandwidth eventually lead to increase bandwidth costs and a tiered access and delivery system? &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28329&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28329#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/33">E-commerce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/767">bandwidth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/530">net neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2671">remote access</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:32:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Habraken</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28329 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What is WAN (Metro) Ethernet?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27953</link>
 <description>Metro Ethernet is the use of telco carrier-supported Ethernet technology in metropolitan area networks (MANs) or Wide Area Networks (WANs) vs. using Ethernet technology for just a Local Area Network (LAN), the most widely used application for the Ethernet protocol.

Because it is typically a collective endeavor with numerous financial contributors, Metro Ethernet offers cost-effectiveness, reliability, scalability and bandwidth management superior to most proprietary networks. Metro Ethernet can connect businesses LANs and individual end users to a WAN or to the Internet. Corporations, academic institutions and government agencies in large cities can use Metro Ethernet to connect branch campuses or offices to an intranet. 
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27953&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27953#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/767">bandwidth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/525">broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12192">fast e</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12191">gig e</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/504">ISP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11553">lan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1089">metro Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/739">MPLS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3659">PRI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/499">SIP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9835">T1</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2182">telecommunications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12193">voice-data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/220">VoIP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2273">WAN</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:43:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BandwidthSeek.Net</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27953 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Whose bandwidth is being given away?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23714</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Security guru Bruce Schneier is certain to kick up a lively discussion today with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2008/01/securitymatters_0110?re&quot;&gt;his essay in Wired&lt;/a&gt; extolling the virtues of wide-open home wireless networks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not going to quibble with him on the security aspects of unprotected Wi-Fi, but I will take exception on another point in a moment. First, Schneier writes:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whenever I talk or write about my own security setup, the one thing that surprises people - and attracts the most criticism - is the fact that I run an open wireless network at home. There&amp;#39;s no password. There&amp;#39;s no encryption. Anyone with wireless capability who can see my network can use it to access the internet. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23714&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23714#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/767">bandwidth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/525">broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/243">Internet</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:59:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul McNamara</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23714 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: VBrick video appliance saves WAN bandwidth</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18889</link>
 <description>You would anyway be able to accomplish this by having a downstream videostreaming server at the branch office. </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18889#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/767">bandwidth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/196">video</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:53:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">18889 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Alacritech&#039;s TCP-offload adapters and Linux?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/13837</link>
 <description> &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/13837&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/13837#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/767">bandwidth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/426">Linux</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/23">Operating Systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/31">Wide Area Networks</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:50:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">13837 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
