<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>google adwords</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8847</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Fake Google Adwords Site Discovered</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30703</link>
 <description>It appears that another round of phishing attacks have emerged and this time they are targeting the Google Adwords platform. Emails are being sent to unsuspecting users containing subject lines such as:

&quot;Update your billing information&quot;
&quot;From Adwords No-Reply&quot;
&quot;Verify Adwords Account&quot;

The idea behind this phishing attack is to obtain credit card information by tricking users into thinking that their ads have become in-active and in order to continue they must re-enter payment information. The site that a user is directed to from the email message looks very authenticate in terms of the real site (in fact the link in the email is real, but some behind the scenes clever HTML coding has changed that).
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30703&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30703#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13990">anti-malware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8847">google adwords</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/603">malware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/74">spam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/712">trojan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/163">virus</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12619">worm</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:39:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rsherstobitoff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30703 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Are Google Ads Old School?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25437</link>
 <description>As reported &lt;a href=http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/022708-google-ad-drop-may-not.html “&gt;Google ad drop may not signal problems&lt;/a&gt; There seems to be a decline in the click thru rates on Google ads of late.  ComScore reported  a 7 percent decline in consumer click thru on Google ads in search results in January, while Hitwise reported that traffic going from Google to retail sites continues to rise.
&lt;br&gt;
In my experience there is always a drop off when you compare January to December on a click thru basis.  November and December are the two highest click thru months for Google Ads due to the retail business for the holidays.  How is this really news that could drop Google’s stock by 4%?  It’s a ridiculous comparison.  
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25437&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25437#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9887">comscore</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8847">google adwords</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/955">social networks</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:27:48 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chikt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">25437 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google ads in trouble?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24956</link>
 <description>The news of Google’s Ad Shares falling this week with further speculation on Google’s fourth quarter down to 40% from 50% in years past, see &lt;a href=http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/021208-googles-us-ad-share-drops.html&gt; Google&#039;s U.S. ad share drops for first time in two years&lt;/a&gt; for more details.  
Google’s Ad shares may not be climbing at the same rate as years past but they are still climbing.  However, the slow down could be expected.  The IAB, Forester and Gartner have all predicted increased advertising on Social Networking sites for 2008.  This is not a surprise as the Social Networking sites have grown the advertising is becoming more sophisticated and targeted giving advertisers a huge potential audience for ads.  
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24956&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24956#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1043">advertising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9452">Forester</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/993">Gartner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9453">Google ads</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8847">google adwords</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9451">IAB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/955">social networks</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:34:46 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chikt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24956 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is Google too divided?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24457</link>
 <description>Google has a policy of keeping its different departments in silos thus not communicating or working together.  But the lack of connection between the different parts of Google leave many questioning how long the expansion can last.

When dealing with Google’s different departments you get a closed feeling that one hand really doesn’t know what the other is doing.  The Advertising products departments like Adwords and Adsense don’t even really understand one another’s products or services. So when Google has a presentation on its newest and greatest products but has no engineers and can’t answer questions about any products outside the few they wanted to discuss it really doesn’t instill a lot of confidence.  
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24457&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24457#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9047">google adsense</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8847">google adwords</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:26:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chikt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24457 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Could Social Networks Beat out Google Adwords for Marketing $$ in 08?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24194</link>
 <description>A just-released Sapient study shows marketers plan to increase spending on social media marketing this year, where they anticipate higher ROI than both digital advertising and email marketing.  Numbers showing a 30% spend on search while a close 21% on social networking!  

I find myself spending much more of my time and energy on social networks rather then my Google Adwords programs.  Social network traffic is on the rise and therefore increasing my traffic without costing me anything but time.  I’ve also found that social network visitors are much more specific in what they are looking for and therefore a better audience for my sites.  
  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24194&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24194#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/33">E-commerce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/71">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8847">google adwords</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/955">social networks</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:22:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chikt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24194 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
