<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>wireless security</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Wireless Security Myths I: SSID Broadcasting</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33820</link>
 <description>Windows Vista sees your wireless network because the access point (AP) broadcasts the network&#039;s service set identifier (SSID). However, when you connect to a wireless network, Vista offers a Save Network check box. If you leave that check box activated, Vista remembers the wireless network, and will connect to it automatically the next time it comes within range. Therefore, after all of your computers have accessed the wireless network at least once, you no longer need to broadcast the network&#039;s SSID. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33820&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33820#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2737">Windows Vista</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:01:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul McFedries</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33820 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>pictures</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33552</link>
 <description>Well, my iPhone doesn&#039;t download pictures automatically. I have to tap them in order to begin the download.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/33552#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/82">Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1188">iPhone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:43:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33552 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Securing smartphone data</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31715</link>
 <description>Our company, Media Sourcery, has recently tackled this problem by implementing a solution for a large health care hospice company, implementing our secure mobile forms solution on smartphones. With it, our customer has protection for their mobile data (which, in their case, includes confidential patient health information) including digital signatures, GPS and timestamps for audit/tracking, and encryption along the way.The solution is simple to use, easy to audit, and integrates with their back-end data warehouse and business system.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31715#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5719">smartphones</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:43:45 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31715 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WEP Stinks, So Why Are You Using It?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31388</link>
 <description>We all know it… we all talk about… we all say how ‘bad’ it is. Yes, we know WEP SUCKS - so why are you still using it?

Yes- I’m talking to &lt;strong&gt;YOU!&lt;/strong&gt;

Day after day, we walk into customer sites- almost all of which are under some (or several) compliance mandates- and day after day, I still see WEP being used in production networks. So, why are they still using WEP? Usually just because they haven’t changed. It worked, it was comfortable and it was ‘okay’ when they implemented it.

But, things have changed. Today any 15 year-old with a free utility and a configured wireless card can crack your WEP… in a few minutes. It’s time to update! In case you’ve been hesitant, let’s go over a few reasons why WEP is so bad.
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31388&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31388#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6095">802.1x</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6808">WEP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/52">wireless</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14896">wpa</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10652">WPA2</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:46:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennifer Jabbusch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31388 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Brief History of Wireless Security</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31387</link>
 <description>A Brief History of Wireless Security: Open, WEP, WPA, WPA2 &amp; 802.1X

I shouldn’t be surprised when customers don’t understand our current wireless security options. It’s not their job really; it’s our job to educate them and make educated recommendations, right? Yes. So, here’s a little bit of education- a brief history of wireless security- from open systems to WPA, WPA2 and 802.1X. Portions of this have been skimmed from my 802.1X Training, Wireless Security Module.

I’m hoping to answer the most common questions burning in every IT professionals mind… How did we get here and why are previous solutions now considered insecure? We’ll start from the beginning, and if all goes well, we’ll finish up at the end…


FULL ENTRY  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31387&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31387#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6095">802.1x</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6808">WEP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/52">wireless</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2464">WLAN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14896">wpa</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10652">WPA2</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:44:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennifer Jabbusch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31387 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wireless Password</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30912</link>
 <description>Why people don&#039;t put in a password is beyond me, but something in the user interface required to set up wireless routers ought to encourage passwords by one means or another.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30912#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:24:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30912 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wireless Security does not come with your infrastructure</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30851</link>
 <description>As wireless becomes a business utility, the question is no longer how do I keep wireless out but rather how do I garner the benefits and efficiencies of wireless while protecting my network. Unfortunately too many organizations have neglected the security aspect of the WLAN installation or been convinced by their infrastructure providers that what is built into their products is enough. The magnitude of this breach demonstrates in no uncertain terms that infrastructure security is not enough and if these retailers were using some other form of wireless monitoring and security, it is not enough. A robust, overlay wireless intrusion prevention system (WIPS) would have prevented these breaches or shut them down way before they had done this much damage. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30851&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30851#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:26:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dellalowe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30851 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Now we know TJX wasn&#039;t the only screw-up...</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30779</link>
 <description>Yesterday&#039;s U.S. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2008/August/08-ag-689.html&quot;&gt;Department of Justice indictment&lt;/a&gt; ought to come as a relief to the TJX, the Massachusetts-based retailer who&#039;s been the corporate whipping boy for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/102407-tjx-data-breach.html&quot;&gt;slack wireless security&lt;/a&gt; for nearly three years.

That&#039;s because it&#039;s now evident that TJX isn&#039;t the only security screwup in retail.
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30779&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30779#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/455">hacking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2554">TJX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14443">wardriving</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/52">wireless</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:19:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30779 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How does Motorola&#039;s purchase of AirDefense affect Cisco&#039;s WLAN?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30627</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Would Motorola&amp;#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/072808-motorola-plans-to-buy.html&quot;&gt;plan to purchase wireless security vendor AirDefense&lt;/a&gt; make a dent in Cisco&amp;#39;s WLAN business? Motorola is hoping the move would strengthen its position against the networking giant, according &lt;img style=&quot;width: 87px; height: 59px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/wireless-tower.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;87&quot; height=&quot;59&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;to an &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid14_gci1323105,00.html?track=sy160&quot;&gt;article in SearchSecurity.com&lt;/a&gt;. The addition of AirDefense would help bump up Motorola&amp;#39;s profile in the WLAN security business as AirDefense is generally acknowledged by industry analysts as the leader in the WLAN IDS/IPS market, suggests the article. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30627&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30627#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3877">AirDefense</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1556">AirMagnet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/578">Motorola</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2464">WLAN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14343">WLAN security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:45:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30627 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wireless broadband</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29817</link>
 <description>The article about Verizon is interesting, but it is technologies that they didn&#039;t mention such as 
wireless (cellular) broadband that poses a larger problem for security. Having an internal laptop with a cellular connection, I can&#039;t monitor the outbound side nor be able to detect it. Vendors would be the biggest issue for my exposure when they have access to critical information.

I enjoy your articles.
lrhode@mprtech.com

</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29817#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/206">carriers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/147">Verizon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:38:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29817 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>iPhone Bluetooth</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29800</link>
 <description>Just to clarify - the iphone had bluetooth, which is used for handsfree communication. It just doesn&#039;t have the A2DP profile whch allows you to listen to music in stero. But you can still hook it up to a bluetooth headset or car kit.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29800#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/82">Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/122">Bluetooth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1188">iPhone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:30:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29800 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Widespread attack possible</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29146</link>
 <description>I regularly test Bluetooth exploits with my class 1 USB dongle at over 80m.  It cost me about $60 from a website in the UK.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29146#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:40:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29146 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Eye-Fi card in the news catching thieves in tha act..</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28530</link>
 <description>Found on Reuters. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSN0643208620080606?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=oddlyEnoughNews&quot;&gt;reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews...oddlyEnoughNews&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28530#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 16:12:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28530 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>finally privacy works</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28122</link>
 <description>Whether due to technical reason but finally PRIVACY works even a little bit not byte.

Zeeshan Ali Shah
infoshield.info</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28122#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/66">privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/310">RIM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 03:11:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28122 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cracking Wi-Fi security with PlayStation 3s</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27968</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;first&quot;&gt;From Network World&amp;#39;s Brad Reed, who this week takes a look inside the new wireless security lab at Lockheed Martin:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;first&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jason Crawford has learned that if you want to break into secure &lt;a href=&quot;/details/739.html&quot;&gt;Wi-Fi&lt;/a&gt; networks, you don&amp;#39;t need to buy equipment from the black market. Instead, you can buy it from Toys &amp;quot;R&amp;quot; Us, he says. &lt;/em&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27968&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27968#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5335">Lockheed Martin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1051">PlayStation 3</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/53">wi-fi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 11:25:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alpha Doggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27968 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hardware (TPM) will secure it!</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27963</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wave.com/solutions/Wireless_Security_802.11i/player.html&quot;&gt;Presentation&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wave.com/about/whitepapers/SecureWirelessWP.pdf&quot;&gt;Whitepaper&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27963#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12207">802.11i</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 09:04:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27963 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I did it Saturday morning</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27008</link>
 <description>While sitting in the parking lot, waiting for the barbershop to open, I picked up an unsecured wireless connection and browsed the news sites for 20 minutes.  I doubt anyone noticed.

BTW, of the 12 or so WiFi nodes I picked up, most (8) were Verizon FIOS, locked by default, identifiable by their five character uppercase SSIDs.  </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:13:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27008 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It was there . . .</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26543</link>
 <description>... but it isn&#039;t now. Good job he knew some &quot;high-ups&quot; then! lol!</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26543#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/113">Laptops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/606">Vista</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 05:09:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26543 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Online Chat Transcript</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26357</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks alot to all the Network Wolrd readers who participated yesterday in our online chat. Don&#039;t forget to check out &lt;a href=&quot;/chat/archive/2008/032608-neil-anderson-cisco-chat.html&quot;&gt;the transcript of the online chat&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26357#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/590">CCIE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1263">CCNA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8189">network virtualization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3107">QoS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/196">video</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1017">voice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/220">VoIP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1071">WAAS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/52">wireless</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:28:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jimandneil_simplified</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26357 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TKIP vs WPA2</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26330</link>
 <description>For the record, WPA2 AES is stronger than TKIP.  &quot;Added security&quot; basically just means swapping the WEP key frequently...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26330#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10653">TKIP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/94">wireless security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10652">WPA2</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:14:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26330 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
