The smartest and dumbest tech moves of 2007 - and why they matter
VMware's IPO was one smart move, while company use of ghost-bloggers pretty darn dumb. See what else made the lists.
By Joanne Cummings
,
Network World
, 12/20/2007
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Overall, the industry did several things right and wrong this year. But here’s what Network World readers, columnists, bloggers and testers say are the absolute smartest and dumbest moves of 2007 -- and why they matter.
Smartest
1. Google’s OpenSocial API and Android phone operating system. Google continues to make all the right moves. “Google has become one of the companies people look to to determine where the
industry is headed. It is a force,” says Josh Hinkle, manager of network management and security for the American Heart Association, in Camp Hill, Pa. “Like with Android, everyone anticipated Google coming out with its
own GPhone, and it basically did the opposite. It went open source and is working with all these partners.”

Tom Nolle, president of CIMI and a Network World columnist, agrees, pointing to the OpenSocial API as a smart move. “It was clever. By opening up the API, it is going to
be able to build a market.”
2. VMware IPO. “VMware has just been smart and right on target time after time,” says Joel Snyder, senior partner at OpusOne and a Network World tester. “From a financial standpoint, it was really smart of EMC to spin it out and get all that cash. I’m sure the EMC CFO
is getting a nice bonus at the end of the year and some high-fives from shareholders.”
3. SCO suit gets slapped down. “The judge slapping down SCO in the SCO vs. IBM/Novell lawsuit was the smartest move,” says Andreas Antonopoulos, founding partner at Nemertes Research and a Network World columnist. “It was a completely frivolous lawsuit by SCO against Linux when it sued IBM and Novell for intellectual property
infringement and then failed to prove it. It was great that it got dismissed.”
4. FCC’s franchise order. “The smartest move was the FCC’s franchise order, when it said the franchise law the cable companies had used to protect
their incumbency in video is anti-consumer and anti-competitive,” Nolle says. “The whole idea of IPTV and telco video would
not have happened if that process had not gone forward.”
5. Cisco’s move into software with the WebEx acquisition. “That’s smart because software lets the company add differentiable features to its products and it’s getting a better level
of strategic engagement with the customer,” Nolle says. (See related story, “Three IT deals that matter.")
Dumbest
1. Funding of social networks. “No one has ever really done a study on the effectiveness of social network sites,” Nolle says.
“Where is the return going to come from? What are we doing?” Snyder agrees. “One of the stupidest moves is Microsoft investing
in Facebook,” he says. “I personally think social networking sites are extremely trendy and there is no reason why there won’t
be another company coming up in a few weeks that everyone will just abandon Facebook and go to. It’s just a trend as opposed
to this is a fundamentally great product.”
2. Comcast vs. the Bible. An Associated Press test in which researchers tried to download the Bible via BitTorrent proved Comcast was blocking BitTorrent
content, whether it was copyrighted or not. “It was just a beautiful bit of PR on the AP researchers’ side,” Antonopoulos
says. “And messing with the protocol in the way Comcast did with forged TCP packets was a dumb move, especially when the net
neutrality issue is dying down.”
Comments (1)
RE: The smartest and dumbest tech moves of 2007 - and why they matterBy Mark Bench on December 21, 2007, 12:43 pmWhat would you make of Microsoft selling downstripped versions of Windows and Office for $3? Is that a "smart move"? I don't think so. Also, the "philantropic"...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments