|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RESEARCH CENTERS
Applications
Careers Convergence Data Center LANs Net/Systems Mgmt. NOSes Outsourcing Routers/Switches Security Service Providers Small/Med. Storage WAN Services Web/e-commerce Wireless/Mobile SITE RESOURCES
Daily News
Newsletters This Week in NW Tests/Reviews Buyer's Guides Opinion Forums Special Issues How to/Primers Case Studies Network Life Encyclopedia IT Briefings TODAY'S NEWS
|
|
It's in their nature
In my last column, I made 10 predictions for the coming year. Two of the predictions generated a number of calls: that Cisco, Bay and Cabletron would buy all manner of gigabit start-ups by the fall, and that one of the Internetworking Big Four (Cisco, Bay, Cabletron and 3Com) will disappear as a separate company by year's end.
Cabletron's acquisition was a smart move because YAGO's switch/router technology will let Cabletron penetrate certain corporate and ISP markets. It also helps create more of a cutting-edge aura for the company in the trade press and financial and user communities (for more information, see report 180114-0001-01.NV "Cabletron Acquires Yet Another Gigabit Organization" in the public reports section of www.currentanalysis.com). As a side note, the acquisition also confirms that the purpose of many of the gigabit start-ups was not to actually sell anything, but to gain the attention of the big players and then sell out. This won't be the last gigabit company Cabletron will snap up this year. Look for it to try to acquire additional technology to help it catch up with Cisco, Bay and 3Com in everything from remote access to VPNs and extranets. Unlike Cabletron, Bay doesn't really need to kick up a market fuss - it's doing just fine on its own. While Bay is not without problems, Dave House has done an admirable job of righting a listing ship (if not quite of Titanic proportions).
So what about the imminent demise of one of the Big Four? First, I do not feel that there is room in the present internetworking market for more than three powerhouse companies. Second, it is extremely unlikely (no, make that downright impossible) that any two of these firms (Cabletron, Cisco, Bay and 3Com) would merge. Third, the chances that one of these vendors migrates away from the traditional core market is increasing every day. Put another way, there is an increasing chance that the market will begin to splinter and one of these firms will find themselves playing in a fundamentally different market. Already Cabletron and 3Com are worlds apart from a competitive perspective. How often do you hear of Cabletron in the commodity modem or adapter markets, which represent an overwhelming majority of 3Com's business? While Cabletron and Bay often compete, as do 3Com and Bay, the real unifying force in this market is Cisco.
Their goal isn't necessarily to dominate the LAN market, but to leverage the LAN and routing/switching technologies with their own datacom and WAN technologies (again, see Nokia and Ipsilon). The rumor mill has recently linked Cabletron with Nortel and Bay with Lucent. Yes, just rumors, but you have to admit that they do make a bit of sense. Not many in the industry would be surprised or disappointed if these turned out to be self-fulfilling rumors. Now I've been in the market long enough to know that there are no "sure"
things, except for perhaps death, taxes and the combination of the two:
estate taxes. So I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't a bit (perhaps
a lot) of disagreement over my predictions or my logic. On the other
hand, what good are predictions if everybody agrees? In fact, when
everybody does agree, that's when I start to get worried. So what do you think?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||