|
June 18, 2009 |
|
BtoB Marketing's Response to Social Media: Have we Lost all Control and Impact? Social Media for Business – Strategy First, Tactics Last Amplify: Creating Positive Word of Mouth with Social Advertising | |
|
The Web Goes Social Paul Gillin, Social Media Consultant and Author of The New Influencers If you’ve signed up for more than a couple of social networks, you’ve undoubtedly experienced the syndrome of seeing your mailbox clutter up each morning with notifications about messages, invitations or comments you’ve received from other members. This deluge can become so annoying that you may simply choose to relegate many of these notices to the black hole of your spam filter. Welcome to the dirty world of the early social Web, a time of chaos and incompatibility that is stifling the real utility of these marvelous new networks. If you’ve been around for a few years, you may remember a similar state of affairs from the pre-Web days. Back in the early days of electronic mail, users of CompuServe, America Online, Prodigy and other branded networks were unable to exchange e-mail with non-subscribers. Even after Internet e-mail had been broadly accepted, America Online clung to its members-only prohibition for some time in the foolhardy belief that it could force members to stay within the fold. Today’s social networks suffer from some of the same limitations. Each has its own profiling system, internal messaging, collaboration systems and applications. Some aggregators like FriendFeed gather up member activity from multiple sites, but such services are mainly limited to collecting RSS feeds. There is no such thing as an integrated online profile. This profusion of information smokestacks won’t last. Two competing standards – one from Facebook and the other from Google – are duking it out to create a standard single identity that travels with Web users. If you’ve signed in to Google and looked up your own name recently you’ve probably noticed that Google now prompts you to fill out a profile. This sketchy self-description is the beginnings of a broader reach by Google to make the entire Web into a social network. In the socialized future, people’s identities will travel with them and their details shared selectively with others within their social network. Profiles will develop incredible richness as details of each person’s preferences, connections, memberships and activities are centralized. It will probably be a year or two before this concept begins to take shape. Regardless of whether Facebook or Google wins the standards war, the social network metaphor will become ubiquitous. Social Colonies One social bookmarking service I use – Diigo.com – provides a glimpse of what the social Web may look like. Diigo (and a similar service called WebNotes) enables members to highlight and comment upon Web pages or passages and share them with others in their network. Visitors can read and add to existing comments in the same way that editors annotate and build upon a draft document. Imagine if the capabilities were expanded to include star ratings, multimedia, discussions and other interactive features. That’s when the social Web really gets exciting. The ripple effects of this shift should be dramatic. Imagine a future in which your company homepage becomes a giant group product review. Forrester’s Owyang foresees a future in which marketing becomes oriented around customer recommendations. There will be no choice. Companies may lose control of the messages on even their own websites as visitors share their own impressions. Owyang also believes companies will have to customize their Web experiences as visitors selectively share information about their interests and preferences. This information will become a kind of currency. We will grant brands and institutions selective access to information about ourselves in exchange for discounts and specialized services. The shift from mass to custom will take a giant step forward. Today’s social networks are no more representative of the Internet of the future than Prodigy was of the Web we know today. These will be incredibly exciting developments to watch. We just have to get past the necessary evil of a standards war in order to appreciate them. Author Profile |
|
|
BtoB Marketing's Response to Social Media: Have we Lost all Control and Impact? For decades marketing has been desperately trying to connect with their customers in a controlled, one-way fashion. We had control of the brand, all marketing content as well as the traditional channels that were used to communicate with the market. And even on occasion, we cautiously exposed our executives and engineers to our customers while all the time holding our breath that they didn't say the "wrong thing" that would hurt our image, costing us millions of dollars in marketing investment and countless hours including nights and weekends executing our marketing strategy. It reminds me of a time when I was a product marketer in the semiconductor industry. I would visit customers quite frequently with our lead engineer. In one meeting this engineer exposed our greatest product flaw to one of our key customers. As I cringed in my seat, I expected the ROI from millions of dollars of investment into the brand value of this product to be instantly destroyed not to mention the lifetime value of this customer as they quickly switched to our competitors' products. To my surprise, the candor expressed by this sincere engineer did not doom our company's success at all. In fact, it was a key factor in gaining credibility with our customer, including serving as the basis for a joint discussion and future research to solve these problems in a collaborative fashion. This new problem-solving process served as a key differentiator for our products in a very commoditized market. What's the connection? Imagine 100s or even 1,000s of your engineers, developers and/or product managers interacting directly with your customers through their own blogs, contribution to other blogs, interaction through Twitter or countless other social media applications. Sound familiar to anyone?... How do we stop this PR nightmare?... How do we control them?... How do we ensure that they stay on-message with our brand?... How can we review every bit of content that they put on the Internet? The simple answer is that we "don't" try to control them. Not to say that we should hang up our marketing hat and make wine in Napa Valley. In this new social media model we need to devise new ways of helping our organization to best represent the company while keeping the needs of the customer at the forefront of our communications; and even better leveraging this new found connection to the customer. Some ideas include:
Taking a more strategic perspective to leverage the power of new social media channels without stifling their potential will enable marketing to significantly increase its impact on the organization. Author Profile About the IDC CMO Advisory Service |
|
|
Social Media for Business – Strategy First, Tactics Last Twitter, Flickr, Facebook – It’s very tempting to jump in and start playing with all these fun tools. Twitter is great fun – the challenge of keeping a post to only 140 characters. Facebook is all about photos, games, fun and sharing, right? But social media plays an important role for businesses. But it is critical that a clear objective or objectives, be decided upon before embarking. Social media is a marketing vehicle. Like any other marketing activity, it requires an objective, a well thought through strategy and last – the tactics to implement that strategy. Each organization might have multiple objectives that could employ social media. A few examples that apply well to social media are:
Each media has its own culture and should be used keeping that in mind. LinkedIn is the most purely business oriented. Twitter, in my mind, tends to be the most demanding of authenticity. Because of its "real time" nature, followers are more tuned into timeliness and value of the content of Tweets and will tell you, and the world, if they don’t like what you have posted. With all of these sites, be very careful with the promotion/sales/lead-gen aspects. That concept is counter-intuitive to the social media context. Are you adding value with your products or services? Talk about that – don’t hard sell. To just touch on best strategies for the major sites: Twitter: Used for branding or reputation management, though leadership, events. The fact that it is short in format requires pithy, well targeted posts. The immediacy (think IM) is great for customer service, crises management and releasing timely PR oriented info. LinkedIn: Very business oriented. The tone is usually not playful, and best used to form trade-related groups to share value and information for networking/leads/sales and events. Facebook: A Facebook Page for business can be informative and playful. Examine your strategy and the positioning you want to take, and the voice you want to establish. YouTube: Video only is great for demos, chronicling events, corporate branding. Many corporations are using video to show their lighter more humorous side. But product demos with a serious tone are perfect as well. Flickr: if photos are part of your story, be sure to post them here, and tag them well. A few more tips: Profiles: Whether personal profiles or business, be sure to present the image you want to portray. These are branding opportunities, and many are combed by search engines, so keep your primary keywords and keyword phrases in the first few lines. Update schedule: Be sure to maintain an ongoing and frequent updated schedule. Well-aged content does not speak well for a company or brand. Make it relevant, timely and post often. Authenticity: The true difference between a social media strategy and your typical MarComm strategy is the lack of "corporate speak." Be sure, whatever your objectives, that your voice is from a real person speaking candid, real thoughts – not carefully crafted copy. Engage: Social media is about creating community and entering into dialog, with your clients, prospects, fans and critics. Don’t let the conversation be pushed from your company to the outside world. Comment on blogs, invite comments on your content, respond to Tweets, keep the conversation going to establish and maintain your voice and credibility. As you are putting together Q3 marketing plans, consider the place that social media will play. It should be some part of almost every company's strategy. Author Profile |
|
|
Amplify: Creating Positive Word of Mouth with Social Advertising Amplify by IDG is a new suite of offerings enabling marketers to spark dialogue about their products within IDG communities (note: IDG is Network World’s parent company). As part of a strategic partnership with Social Media.com, IDG aims to unite marketers with products that make advertising social. IDG’s Amplify services enable marketers to execute social marketing campaigns that can grow and generate word-of-mouth messages across multiple IDG media brands and within social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter. The ad units utilize three types of online relationships: friend-to-friend, peer-to-peer, and community-based. Marketers can stimulate conversations, obtain important feedback, and be closely aligned with a topic or event. IDG Amplify-based campaigns can also extend advertisers’ social marketing programs, enhance a brand’s equity through positive word of mouth, and deepen a consumer’s interaction with the brands and conversations they care about. IDG has developed tools to measure these interactions including audience engagement, viral distribution, and participants’ sentiments about topics and brands. "IDG’s Amplify services take advantage of three key trends: IT advertisers increasing their spending on social media by 20% in 2009; staying agile by partnering with emerging market specialists; and providing the metrics that fuel advertisers’ heightened focus on ROI and analytics," said Chuck Richard, vice president and lead analyst at information industry research and advisory firm, Outsell, Inc. In a survey of IT buyers (http://tinyurl.com/dcyc3g), 50 percent of the respondents said they participated in at least two social networking activities a month. Two-thirds of the decision makers spent slightly more than one hour per week on professional networking sites such as LinkedIn while almost half spent just under one hour per week on Facebook. The online survey attracted more than 300 responses last November. "The buyer research matches the growing interest in social media among marketers," said Matthew Yorke, senior vice president, Sales and Marketing, IDG Communications. Yorke added: "We have credible, trusted media sites where the conversations can begin and spread. Paid media brings people to a place while social media prompts interaction that leads to accumulated value over time." For more information on Amplify, including a demo, please visit the IDG Knowledge Hub. |
|