- The most dangerous jobs in technology
- Burning Man's open source cell phone system could save the world
- Only 5 (all women) of 135 pass Defcon social engineering test
- Fake antivirus software using ransom threats
- Cisco buys wireless smart grid company
Wireless LANs are a natural fit in the home and, for some, a constant source of fits. Standard 802.11 WLANs suffer limited throughput, which only worsens as the distance between the client and the access point/router increases. The highly variable nature of radio propagation means seemingly short distances can yield poor results, especially when walls and floors get in the way.
To improve conditions and make WLANs robust enough to stream media, hardware vendors have begun applying multiple-input/multiple-output (MIMO ) technology. MIMO uses multiple antennas on each end of a radio link to send and receive several unique radio signals in a single radio frequency channel. The ability to send multiple, distinct datastreams over the same signal simultaneously, known as spatial multiplexing, can double and even triple data throughput rates.
Moreover, sophisticated algorithms create a signal that's louder, which translates directly into corresponding improvements in performance.
Belkin entered the consumer market last fall with the first MIMO-based products, built using Airgo Networks' chipset - products Belkin calls pre-N, in reference to the IEEE's upcoming 802.11n standard.
Since last fall, Linksys, D-Link Systems and Netgear have shipped "MIMO-based" products. However, the technologies they use and call MIMO vary considerably. While all three use multiple antennas to send and receive multiple datastreams over the same signal, only the Linksys SRX line uses spacial multiplexing (like Belkin) to transmit multiple, distinct datastreams over the same signal.
These first MIMO-based products won't be compatible with those based on the final 802.11n specification. However, they are fully Wi-Fi-compliant. Three important questions remain: Do today's MIMO-based products provide sufficient performance to justify the cost? How does the performance compare with standard 802.11g products? Do they cause interoperability problems on a mixed network?
To find out, we devised a series of tests to determine how MIMO-based products would fare against standard 802.11g gear. To mitigate the effect of radio-related artifacts, we rented a house for the sole purpose of running these tests. It was empty except for our equipment and us.
To benchmark performance, we used Iperf, a free LAN test suite. We ran the same test in each case; the only variables being the devices tested and their locations. Because location can't be reproduced precisely with antenna orientation, we placed the client notebooks on turntables revolving at 45 seconds per rotation. This let each radio cycle pass through a range of orientations, factoring out any overly beneficial (or detrimental) positioning. Two full cycles (90 seconds) defined each run.
We tested two MIMO products, Belkin's pre-N router (F5D8230-4) and PC card (F5D8010 ); and four standard 802.11g products - the Linksys WRT54GS router and WPC54GS PC Card, and the Netgear WGU624 router and WG511T PC Card. (We turned off the power management on our Dell Inspiron 8600 notebook and used default driver settings.)
Comment