From RFC 2068 Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1:
10.4.5 404 Not Found
The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI. No indication is given of whether the condition is temporary or permanent.
If the server does not wish to make this information available to the client, the status code 403 (Forbidden) can be used instead. The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the server knows, through some internally configurable mechanism, that an old resource is permanently unavailable and has no forwarding address.
Error 404--Not Found
Error 404--Not Found
From RFC 2068 Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1:
10.4.5 404 Not Found
The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI. No indication is given of whether the condition is temporary or permanent.
If the server does not wish to make this information available to the client, the status code 403 (Forbidden) can be used instead. The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the server knows, through some internally configurable mechanism, that an old resource is permanently unavailable and has no forwarding address.
Xerox wins suit against Palm, 3Com
NOTE: We are launching a new and improved
Fusion this weekend. Some things may not look or work right for a bit. Our apologies for the inconvenience!
Xerox's long-standing patent infringement suit over Palm Inc. and 3Com's use of its handwriting recognition reached a milestone Thursday when a U.S. District Court ruled Xerox's patent was "valid and enforceable" and that the two companies had infringed it.
The ruling ends the liability portion of the case, clearing the way for Xerox to seek damages in the next phase, Xerox said. The trial court will now determine the amount of damages to which Xerox is entitled, as well as ruling on Palm's ability to continue to use the technology.
Palm will have to either cease production of its handheld devices or license the technology from Xerox, Christina Clayton, Xerox general counsel, said in a statement.
If the court finds that Palm and 3Com, which are both separately liable, willfully infringed the patent, the court can triple the amount of damages due to Xerox, the company said.
The lawsuit was originally filed against U.S. Robotics in 1997. Subsequently, 3Com acquired U.S. Robotics, then spun off its Palm division as Palm Inc. The suit looked set to end last year when a U.S. District Court Judge for the Western District of New York dismissed it. The judge's grounds were that Palm's Graffiti handwriting recognition software, a part of the Palm OS that runs on handheld devices, does not use the same recognition patterns as does Xerox's technology.
Two months ago, however, an appeals court threw out the judge's ruling, saying the judge had not understood the technology used in Graffiti.
Palm would not comment on the suit or the possibility of an appeal, as the company is still in the process of reviewing the judge's opinion, a spokeswoman for the company said.
Palm could not be immediately reached for comment.
The IDG News Service is a Network World affiliate.
Apply for your free subscription to Network World. Click here.