Search /
Docfinder:
Advanced search  |  Help  |  Site map
RESEARCH CENTERS
SITE RESOURCES
Click for Layer 8! No, really, click NOW!
Networking for Small Business
TODAY'S NEWS
iPhone 5 rumor rollup for the week ending Feb. 10
Forget Public Cloud or Private Cloud, It's All About Hyper-Hybrid
Apple passes HP as largest tech company
How to get the IRS' attention: Forge nearly $8 million in tax returns, steal identities
Much of Western U.S. is a 3G wasteland, says FCC
How the Phoenix Suns basketball team takes on social media attacks
Microsoft details Windows 8 for ARM devices
Resume Makeover: How an Information Security Professional Can Target CSO Jobs
Blogger exposes major Google Wallet security flaw
Web app lets enterprise set security, sharing for Google Apps users
Cloudscaling to offer OpenStack private cloud platform
Macs take on the enterprise
Valentine's Day Patch Tuesday: Microsoft to issue 9 patches, 4 critical
Mobile World Congress sneak peek: Quad-core smartphones, Ice Cream Sandwich & more
/

AT&T and others request freeze on telecom ruling

Today's breaking news
Send to a friendFeedback

Today's breaking news
Send to a friendFeedback


AT&T and MCI Communications Corp. have joined a chorus of long-distance operators complaining about a U.S. judge's ruling that effectively opens the door for regional Bell operating companies to offer long-distance telephone service.

AT&T and MCI have filed a motion to freeze last week's ruling from a U.S. federal judge, who deemed as unconstitutional some sections in the 1996 Telecommunications Reform Act that effectively bar RBOCs from offering long-distance telephone services. The long-distance operators last week asked the U.S. District Court to stay the Dec. 31 decision from a judge in Wichita Falls, Texas.

The federal judge's ruling came in a lawsuit filed by SBC Communications, Inc. in July last year, which claimed that Sections 271 to 275 of the Telecommunications Reform Act of 1996 unconstitutionally single out and prevent the former Bell companies from providing long-distance phone and electronic publishing services. Already, other RBOCs have petitioned for long-distance rights but have lost.

Sprint Corp., however, claimed that U.S. local telecom markets are not yet open to competition and risk to remain closed should legislators let RBOCs operate long-distance services. Currently the promise of a long-distance license is the carrot to persuade operators like SBC to further open up the local markets in which they operate.

"This is plainly a case where the status quo should be maintained until the Court of Appeals has had a chance to pass on the matter," is how operators worded their motion, AT&T said in a statement.

Accompanying AT&T and MCI in the call to stay last week's ruling are Sprint, the Association for Local Telecommunications Services, the Competitive Telecommunications Association, the National Cable Television Association and the Telecommunications Resellers Association.

US WEST, which joined SBC last week in applauding last week's decision, announced it is ready to begin offering long-distance services in the 14 states where it is a local operator.

Apply for your free subscription to Network World. Click here. Or get Network World delivered in PDF each week.

Get Copyright Clearance
Request a reprint or permission to use this article.


NWFusion offers more than 40 FREE technology-specific email newsletters in key network technology areas such as NSM, VPNs, Convergence, Security and more.
Click here to sign up!
New Event - WANs: Optimizing Your Network Now.
Hear from the experts about the innovations that are already starting to shake up the WAN world. Free Network World Technology Tour and Expo in Dallas, San Francisco, Washington DC, and New York.
Attend FREE
Your FREE Network World subscription will also include breaking news and information on wireless, storage, infrastructure, carriers and SPs, enterprise applications, videoconferencing, plus product reviews, technology insiders, management surveys and technology updates - GET IT NOW.