Search /
Docfinder:
Advanced search  |  Help  |  Site map
RESEARCH CENTERS
SITE RESOURCES
Click for Layer 8! No, really, click NOW!
Networking for Small Business
TODAY'S NEWS
Valentine's Day Patch Tuesday: Microsoft to issue 9 patches, 4 critical
Mobile World Congress sneak peek: Quad-core smartphones, Ice Cream Sandwich & more
Microsoft details 'Windows on ARM' program
March debut of 'iPad 3' a sure bet, says analyst
FBI unbolts Steve Jobs 1991 investigation file
Cisco boosted profit, sales in Q2 while cutting costs
Macs take on the enterprise
Four crazy tech ideas from Google's Solve for X project
Obama 2012 campaign playlist revealed courtesy of Spotify
Oracle buying Taleo for US$1.9 billion in direct hit at SAP
Amazon attacks Apple: You get 3 Kindle products for price of iPad 2
Pre-rendered pages highlight latest Google Chrome release
Microsoft exec: Lync-Skype integration a 'compelling opportunity'
The future of hypervisors
/

Microsoft claims biased court adviser will delay case

Today's breaking news
Send to a friendFeedback


Microsoft Corp. claims that a court-appointed adviser in the U.S. Department of Justice's antitrust complaint against it is biased and will lead to additional delay in the case, according to documents filed yesterday.

In its latest brief filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., Microsoft argued that the adviser - special master Lawrence Lessig, who is a Harvard University law professor - was improperly appointed without Microsoft's consent and is less qualified to interpret the issues than the U.S. District Court the case was filed in.

In addition, Microsoft claimed that contrary to the DOJ's arguments, the lower court will be required by federal rules to accept Lessig's findings unless they are "clearly erroneous," and that the case will be dragged out because both sides will have to present their evidence and arguments twice -- to both Lessig and then the court itself.

No "'exceptional condition' exists that could possibly justify the reference of this non-jury case to a special master," Microsoft's brief said.

In the brief, Microsoft said Lessig's impartiality "might reasonably be questioned" because of an e-mail Lessig sent to a friend who works at Netscape Communications Corp., a staunch Microsoft rival, that complained about Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser. In the e-mail, Lessig also compared his installing a Microsoft product on his Macintosh to "selling his soul."

The DOJ took Microsoft to court last October claiming the firm was violating a 1995 antitrust consent decree by forcing OEMs to license Internet Explorer along with Windows 95. A judge issued a preliminary injunction in December requiring Microsoft to unbundle the browser from the operating system.

Before the court could rule on a DOJ contempt-of-court request, Microsoft and the DOJ settled out of court. Microsoft agreed to offer Windows 95 versions with the Internet Explorer icon removed. However, Microsoft persisted in appealing the preliminary injunction and the appointment of Lessig to the case.

Oral arguments on the appeal are scheduled for April 21.


NWFusion offers more than 40 FREE technology-specific email newsletters in key network technology areas such as NSM, VPNs, Convergence, Security and more.
Click here to sign up!
New Event - WANs: Optimizing Your Network Now.
Hear from the experts about the innovations that are already starting to shake up the WAN world. Free Network World Technology Tour and Expo in Dallas, San Francisco, Washington DC, and New York.
Attend FREE
Your FREE Network World subscription will also include breaking news and information on wireless, storage, infrastructure, carriers and SPs, enterprise applications, videoconferencing, plus product reviews, technology insiders, management surveys and technology updates - GET IT NOW.