Search /
Docfinder:
Advanced search  |  Help  |  Site map
RESEARCH CENTERS
SITE RESOURCES
Click for Layer 8! No, really, click NOW!
Networking for Small Business
TODAY'S NEWS
Valentine's Day Patch Tuesday: Microsoft to issue 9 patches, 4 critical
Mobile World Congress sneak peek: Quad-core smartphones, Ice Cream Sandwich & more
Microsoft details 'Windows on ARM' program
March debut of 'iPad 3' a sure bet, says analyst
FBI unbolts Steve Jobs 1991 investigation file
Cisco boosted profit, sales in Q2 while cutting costs
Macs take on the enterprise
Four crazy tech ideas from Google's Solve for X project
Obama 2012 campaign playlist revealed courtesy of Spotify
Oracle buying Taleo for US$1.9 billion in direct hit at SAP
Amazon attacks Apple: You get 3 Kindle products for price of iPad 2
Pre-rendered pages highlight latest Google Chrome release
Microsoft exec: Lync-Skype integration a 'compelling opportunity'
The future of hypervisors
/

MS/DOJ: Trial goes back on front burner

Today's breaking news
Send to a friendFeedback


Microsoft's antitrust battle with the Department of Justice will heat up again tomorrow. Each side is due to submit lengthy filings to the federal courthouse in which they spell will out their version of the facts.

Microsoft's "finding of fact," as it's called, runs to about 400 pages and argues that the Justice Department has failed to prove some of the key elements of its antitrust lawsuit filed in May 1998 by the U.S. government and 19 states.

In particular, Microsoft will argue that the government has failed to support its contention that the software giant illegally tied its Internet Explorer browser to its Windows operating system in a bid to harm rival Netscape, says Microsoft Spokesman Jim Cullinan.

"They didn't identify Internet Explorer as a separate product because Internet Explorer is a fully integrated part of the [Windows operating system], and that decision was made long before Netscape was formed as a company," Cullinan says.

Microsoft will also assert in its filing that the Justice Department failed to show that the software vendor's behavior harmed consumers.

The Justice Department declined to comment on the substance of its own filing. A Justice Department spokeswoman would say only that the document is "lengthy."

The government has charged Microsoft with a pattern of aggressive behavior that it says was designed to protect the software giant's monopoly in the desktop software market, and extend that monopoly to the Internet.

The parties will review each other's filings, and then will have until Sept. 10 to submit a revised version to the court.

The schedule calls for each side to be back in court Sept. 21 to present closing arguments to Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson. Jackson will then render his own version of the facts heard in the case.

Microsoft and the Justice Department will then submit briefs in which they discuss what laws come into play and how they believe those laws should be applied in this case.

Both parties have said they will make their findings of fact public on their respective Web sites.

RELATED LINKS

NWFusion offers more than 40 FREE technology-specific email newsletters in key network technology areas such as NSM, VPNs, Convergence, Security and more.
Click here to sign up!
New Event - WANs: Optimizing Your Network Now.
Hear from the experts about the innovations that are already starting to shake up the WAN world. Free Network World Technology Tour and Expo in Dallas, San Francisco, Washington DC, and New York.
Attend FREE
Your FREE Network World subscription will also include breaking news and information on wireless, storage, infrastructure, carriers and SPs, enterprise applications, videoconferencing, plus product reviews, technology insiders, management surveys and technology updates - GET IT NOW.