Search /
Docfinder:
Advanced search  |  Help  |  Site map
RESEARCH CENTERS
SITE RESOURCES
Click for Layer 8! No, really, click NOW!
Networking for Small Business
TODAY'S NEWS
Cisco all but kills Cius tablet computer
Windows 8 Update: Steve Ballmer's 80-inch Windows 8 tablet
Gartner: Don't trust cloud provider to protect your corporate assets
Take me out to the ballgame, with 4G
Most OpenOffice users run Windows
Smartphones with quad-core chips and 4G LTE coming soon
Government alarm over cyberattacks validated by terrorists
Lawmakers call on DOJ to reopen investigation into Google Wi-Fi spying
Researchers propose TLS extension to detect rogue SSL certificates
IaaS: Renting on-demand technology
Yahoo Axis may be game changer for search and the troubled company
Android, Apple Own 80% of Global Smartphone Market; Microsoft's Share, 2.2%
Managing Mobile Mania
Proposed New York Legislation Would Ban Anonymous Online Comments
Supercomputer to connect to 400PB of storage via Ethernet
/

Prodigy gets victory in BT hyperlink patent suit

Today's breaking news
Send to a friendFeedback


A U.S. federal judge Thursday threw out the claim by British Telecommunications that Prodigy Communications violated a patent on hyperlinking, the technology that connects data on the Web via highlighted object links.

Judge Colleen McMahon of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a summary judgment in Prodigy's favor saying the company did not violate a patent that BT claims for hyperlink technology. The decision came on the heels of a previous order from McMahon that limited how BT could present and defend its claims on the patent. A summary judgment is a ruling in which the judge decides there are no factual issues that remain to be tried in a case and so parts of the case, or the entire complaint, can be decided without a trial. It can be appealed.

BT, in London, claimed that its so-called Sargent patent, U.S. patent number 4,873,662, filed in the U.S. in 1976 and granted in 1989, provided the company with the rights to hyperlinking.

"I find that as a matter of law, no jury could find that Prodigy infringes the Sargent patent, nor that Prodigy contributes to infringement of the Sargent patent, nor actively induces others to infringe that patent," McMahon wrote in Thursday's opinion. "I therefore grant Prodigy's motion for summary judgment."

Prodigy, now a subsidiary of SBC Communications Inc., in Austin, Texas, has said it was the first commercial ISP in the U.S. and that this status made it the target for BT's suit.

"At this point, we trust that this will put to rest the claims that have been made," an SBC spokesman said. "We are hoping that this puts the issue to rest."

BT did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

BT first filed suit in a federal court in White Plains, New York, in regard to the alleged patent infringement. The company said the patent stemmed from research by an employee of the U.K. General Post Office (GPO) in the 1970s into text-based information systems. The GPO was divided into BT and the Post Office in 1981.

The IDG News Service is a Network World affiliate.

RELATED LINKS

Apply for your free subscription to Network World. Click here. Or get Network World delivered in PDF each week.

Get Copyright Clearance
Request a reprint or permission to use this article.


NWFusion offers more than 40 FREE technology-specific email newsletters in key network technology areas such as NSM, VPNs, Convergence, Security and more.
Click here to sign up!
New Event - WANs: Optimizing Your Network Now.
Hear from the experts about the innovations that are already starting to shake up the WAN world. Free Network World Technology Tour and Expo in Dallas, San Francisco, Washington DC, and New York.
Attend FREE
Your FREE Network World subscription will also include breaking news and information on wireless, storage, infrastructure, carriers and SPs, enterprise applications, videoconferencing, plus product reviews, technology insiders, management surveys and technology updates - GET IT NOW.