Doing the right thing, MCI style
We ace MCI's ethics test; has the carrier learned its lesson?
By
Denise Pappalardo
,
Network World
, 02/16/2004
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
What would Julie do? That's the question MCI's 55,000 employees have been trained to ask themselves and each other every day as the carrier seeks to remake its image in
the wake of the more than $9 billion accounting scandal that led it into the largest bankruptcy in history.
It's also the question I pondered two weeks ago when MCI agreed to let me take its mandatory ethics course.
The course, which I took while sitting in front of a computer at MCI's Ashburn, Va., headquarters, consists of a 30- to 60-minute
online program that confronts me with a series of ethical situations. The most memorable involves Julie, a fictitious MCI
employee who needs my help to navigate the dangerous and sometimes murky waters of telecom finance. Should she ignore the
error she discovers in a colleague's financial report as this co-worker suggests? Or should she confront the colleague, who
is a friend, and get the mistake fixed? Armed with the program's six steps for making ethical decisions, I'm able to steer
Julie down the right path.
"People at MCI are really very embarrassed about what happened at their company," says Nancy Higgins, who joined the carrier
in October as its first chief ethics officer. "Employees are really happy to see the company spending the time [on ethics training]."
MCI, which is widely expected to emerge from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection by April, has gone beyond ethics requirements
placed upon it by the bankruptcy court and Securities and Exchange Commission. The carrier only had to put about 1,200 executive
and financial employees through ethics training, but Chairman and CEO Michael Capellas insisted upon training the whole company.
The training requires employees to think through a set of theoretical ethical dilemmas ranging from basic to extreme (Are
you justified if you kill an attacker in order to defend your family?).
While it's too soon to say whether the program will bring about cultural change at MCI or wind up as an elaborate public relations
exercise, the carrier appears to be taking its opportunity for a second chance seriously.
For example, MCI chose not to assemble its ethics program with any fly-by-night outfit, but rather with New York University
School of Continuing and Professional Studies' Corporate Learning Services. The program took nine months to develop, though
the carrier had to hustle to get it in front of employees last fall after the General Services Administration (GSA) banned
MCI from bidding on new government contracts because of questions it had regarding the company's ethics and corporate governance
programs. (The GSA has since lifted the restriction.) MCI put 20,000 employees through the program one week and another 20,000 the next, straining the Web servers hosted by
the university.
At MCI headquarters, where about 5,000 employees work, the company's fresh focus on ethics is hard to miss, from the "What
would Julie do?" T-shirts to banners and posters down hallways and in conference rooms that remind employees that "Our code
is the standard, you make the difference" and "Do the right thing, because it's the right thing to do."
The latter message could also be called Capellas' mantra. Not only has he repeated it in speeches and at press conferences,
but it's in much of MCI's printed employee material, such as its 23-page code of ethics and business conduct.
"Do the right thing" is also one of the company's 10 guiding principles, which are affixed to badges that employees wear around
their necks along with their security tags. Also on the list is "Set the tone at the top," "Avoid conflicts of interest,"
and "Set metrics and report results accurately."
Communicating the company's message of integrity and educating employees on how to avoid misconduct is an ongoing effort for
Higgins, who previously oversaw ethics at Lockheed Martin and Boeing. "We can't deal with any of the problems we don't know
about. We want to create an environment where people will feel comfortable reporting [questionable ethics]," she says.
Comment