EU pushes for safeguards on biometric technologies
By
Scarlet Pruitt
,
IDG News Service
, 03/31/2005
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Although biometric technologies can contribute to a more secure society, governments need to take measures to inform citizens
how the technologies will be used and put privacy protections in place before they are widely adopted, according to a European
Commission report released this week.
The conclusions were outlined in a 166-page report probing the possible effects of biometric technologies on citizens' lives
following the European Union's decision to introduce biometric passports, visas and resident permits into EU member states
beginning in 2006.
The release of the report came one day before EU Commissioner Franco Frattini asked the U.S. to extend its deadline for the
introduction of high-tech passports from October 2005 to August 2006 because the security and interoperability of the technology
is still being finalized.
The U.S. set out tougher rules following the Sept. 11, 2001, World Trade Center attacks, requiring foreigners to carry passports
with digital photographs or electronically embedded information to gain entry to the country. The EU has already been granted
one extension on the original October 2004 deadline. It now says that of the 25 EU member states, only six - Belgium, Germany,
Austria, Finland, Sweden and Luxembourg - will be able to issue the new passports by October 2005.
The request for an extension to ensure the security and interoperability of the technology mirrors suggestions laid out in
the European Commission report. It concluded that while biometric technologies such as fingerprint, iris and face recognition
will help in securing countries' borders as well as creating a "trusted" information society, their use needs to be well tested
and defined.
On the technical side, biometrics are vulnerable to errors and can be spoofed, so large-scale field tests are in order, the
Commission found. Because biometrics systems are "never 100% effective," expectations surrounding their use need to be brought
in line with reality, it wrote. It also suggested the creation of fallback procedures to deal with the failures of biometric
systems, such as skilled workers who can deal with identification problems.
Privacy and the creation of a "surveillance society" is also a concern, but the Commission proposed that biometrics can be
used to enhance privacy because they allow for authentication without revealing a person's identity. It also suggested that
when using multiple biometric features the information can be stored separately to limit the erosion of privacy through the
linkage of data sets. The Commission encouraged policy measures that increase privacy, saying that they are key to making
biometrics acceptable to the public.
Public acceptance of biometrics was listed as a primary goal by the Commission, which not only wants to put the technologies
in use across its member sates, but also wants to create a thriving European biometrics industry. Such an industry "is unlikely
to emerge by itself and will need kick-starting by governments in their role as launch customers, not as regulators," the
report states.
The IDG News Service is a Network World affiliate.
Comment