Furor over Cisco IOS router exploit erupts at Black Hat

Although Cisco and Internet Security Systems had abruptly cancelled a planned technical talk and demo at the Black Hat Conference to reveal how unpatched Cisco routers can be remotely compromised, the researcher who had originally uncovered the problem went ahead with the talk anyway, igniting a spate of lawsuits against himself and the Black Hat Conference.

More: Cisco nixes conference session on hacking IOS router code
Researcher at center of Cisco router-exploit controversy speaks out
Cisco, ISS, Michael Lynn and Black Hat sign legal accord
Forum: Who's right?

To continue reading, register here and become an Insider. You'll get free access to premium content from CIO, Computerworld, CSO, InfoWorld, and Network World. See more Insider content or sign in.

Although Cisco and Internet Security Systems had abruptly cancelled a planned technical talk and demo at the Black Hat Conference to reveal how unpatched Cisco routers can be remotely compromised, the researcher who had originally uncovered the problem went ahead with the talk anyway, igniting a spate of lawsuits against himself and the Black Hat Conference.

More: Cisco nixes conference session on hacking IOS router code
Researcher at center of Cisco router-exploit controversy speaks out
Cisco, ISS, Michael Lynn and Black Hat sign legal accord
Forum: Who's right?

Michael Lynn, the research analyst at ISS who was asked to resign after his presentation detailing how an attacker can exploit flaws in unpatched Cisco routers to gain total control over them, said he felt compelled to reveal the information because “I felt I had to do what’s right for the country and the national infrastructure.”

Cisco and ISS, claiming it was premature to release the research, saw it differently and immediately filed a lawsuit aimed at compelling him not to discuss the subject further. The Black Hat Conference was also served with a lawsuit by the two companies for allowing Lynn to discuss the exploits associated with Cisco routers.

Black Hat CEO Jeff Moss yesterday said he felt trapped in the middle. “Michael Lynn said he was going to discuss VoIP,” said Moss. “I can’t control a speaker who changes his topic in the middle of a presentation.”

Told by ISS not to discuss the Cisco router exploit, Lynn did begin his presentation at Black Hat on Wednesday with a substitute presentation on VoIP. But the boos from the audience which had come to hear the original topic entitled “The Holy Grail: Cisco IOS Shellcode and Remote Execution,” induced him to switch to the original scheduled topic: the research he carried out at ISS that shows how an attacker can completely take control of a Cisco router through a variety of buffer-overflow attacks and shellcode exploits.

While this type of attack is common against unpatched servers today - several destructive Internet worms in past years have used buffer-overflow attacks to take over Microsoft-based servers - this was believed to be the first demonstration of a buffer-overflow attack against Cisco routers.

Lynn did not publicly provide the specific attack code to carry out the attack - which he said could be accomplished in several ways on unpatched Cisco routers - but he provided evidence it could be done. Lynn said he got some of his insights by reading information posted on Chinese hacker sites.

ISS just last week stated it had intended to provide a “first” in this security area, but by this Monday, discussions with Cisco - which had been expected to participate in the Black Hat presentation - ended up with the two firms abruptly canceling the talk on Monday.

In addition, Cisco Monday warned the Black Hat organizers that if they did not remove the 15 pages of written material that ISS had submitted over a  month ago to be included in the bound 1,000-page conference proceedings, it would file a lawsuit against the conference.