- 12 myths about how the Internet works
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- IETF: Should we ignore the Kaminsky bug?
- Top 10 wicked cool algorithms
- How to recession-proof yourself
A newly formed lobbying group instigated by one of VeriSign's rivals filed a lawsuit Monday challenging the settlement agreement VeriSign struck last month with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the regulatory group that oversees the Internet's technical infrastructure.
The Coalition for ICANN Transparency (CFIT) filed suit in U.S. District Court in San Jose, alleging anti-trust violations and illegal competitive acts on VeriSign's part, abetted by ICANN. The Washington, D.C., group is asking the court to invalidate the settlement arrangement between VeriSign and ICANN and order the two organizations to stick with the terms of their current .com domain operation until its scheduled expiration in 2007.
VeriSign and ICANN ended nearly two years of legal wrangling with a deal last month that laid the foundation for establishing processes to smooth interactions between the Domain Name System's overseer and one of its key service providers. The October agreement extends VeriSign's contract to operate the .com domain name registry through 2012 and sets up a system for rapid ICANN decision making about approval of proposed new VeriSign services.
It's the easing of VeriSign's ability to launch new domain name services that worries Canadian domain-name services company Momentous.ca, CFIT's ringleader. One of Momentous.ca's subsidiaries, Pool.com, filed a lawsuit against VeriSign in 2003 after VeriSign launched a domain wait-list service that directly competed with Pool.com's offerings. Momentous.ca fears that VeriSign's unfettered ability to launch new products would destroy smaller rival vendors.
"VeriSign's conduct makes it abundantly clear that it has no intention of reigning in its illegal monopolistic imperialism until it has conquered every market related to Internet domain names," CFIT wrote in its lawsuit. "This is an action to preserve the status quo in markets related to Internet domain names, and to prevent VeriSign from expanding its monopoly control over the .com and .net domain name registries into downstream and adjacent markets."
A spokesman for VeriSign, which has headquarters in Mountain View, Calif., said the company had no immediate comment on CFIT's lawsuit. ICANN's staff is traveling this week for an ICANN meeting in Vancouver and could not be reached.
Rss FeedRss Feed
| NetworkWorld, Inc. | About Network World, Inc. | Advertise | Careers | Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy | Reprints and links | Partnerships | Press room | Subscribe to NW |
| IDG, Inc. | CIO | Computerworld | CSO | Demo | GamePro | Games.net | IDGconnect.com | IDG World Expo | Infoworld | JavaWorld.com | LinuxWorld.com | MacUser | Macworld | PC World | Playlistmag.com | The Industry Standard | IDG List Services | IDG TechNetwork |
 The Leader in Network Knowledge© 1994-2008 Network World, Inc. All rights reserved. |
Partner Content
NetScout and analyst Jim Metzler have teamed to deliver a series of IT Briefs on Network and Application Performance Management leveraging research from NetScout’s nGenius & Sniffer users.
www.netscout.com
Metzler on CIO Priorities
The top five CIO priorities based on a survey of NetScout users revealing CIOs' top priorities and what they think they should be. Also includes interviews with CIOs of large organizations.
Read the Report
Metzler on Application Delivery
How to eliminate the stovepiped or siloed nature of application delivery from both an organization and a technological perspective.
Read the Brief
Metzler on Network Troubleshooting
Overview of network troubleshooting that provides an assessment of where we are, and where we need to be relative to the complexities of today's IT challenges.
Read the Brief
Comment