Committee rejects 'Net neutrality provision

Internet companies and consumer groups calling for a new U.S. law that would prohibit broadband providers from blocking or degrading some connections lost a major battle Wednesday when a House of Representatives committee voted down such a provision.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee, during debate on a telecommunications reform bill, rejected an amendment that would write so-called 'Net neutrality provisions into law. Backers of a net neutrality law want Congress to prohibit U.S. broadband providers from blocking or slowing their customers' connections to Web sites or services that compete with services offered by the providers.

The committee rejected the amendment, on a vote of 34-22, largely along party lines, with all but one Republican opposing the net neutrality amendment offered by Rep.Ed Markey (D-Mass.).

To continue reading, register here and become an Insider. You'll get free access to premium content from CIO, Computerworld, CSO, InfoWorld, and Network World. See more Insider content or sign in.

Internet companies and consumer groups calling for a new U.S. law that would prohibit broadband providers from blocking or degrading some connections lost a major battle Wednesday when a House of Representatives committee voted down such a provision.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee, during debate on a telecommunications reform bill, rejected an amendment that would write so-called 'Net neutrality provisions into law. Backers of a net neutrality law want Congress to prohibit U.S. broadband providers from blocking or slowing their customers' connections to Web sites or services that compete with services offered by the providers.

The committee rejected the amendment, on a vote of 34-22, largely along party lines, with all but one Republican opposing the net neutrality amendment offered by Rep.Ed Markey (D-Mass.).

The committee voted 42-12 to approve the telecom reform bill, largely focused on allowing telecom carriers to offer television services over IP in competition with cable TV. The bill, which now goes to the full House for a vote, would create a national franchising system, instead of requiring that new television providers seek local franchises across the U.S.

Backers of the Markey amendment said it would prohibit broadband providers from creating a new online "tax" by charging Internet companies an extra fee for faster connections to their customers.

The telecom bill, which prohibits the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from making new net neutrality rules, will "put at grave risk the Internet as an engine of innovation, job creation and economic growth," Markey said late Tuesday. "This will stifle openness, endanger our global competitiveness, and warp the Web into a tiered Internet of bandwidth haves and have-nots."

Internet companies including Google and Yahoo, as well as organizations such as the Gun Owners of America, the National Religious Broadcasters, liberal group MoveOn.org and the Consumers Federation of America, have called for a strong net neutrality law. Backers of a strong net neutrality law say it's needed after the FCC last August deregulated DSL providers, allowing them to no longer share their lines with competitors.

The committee's wide-ranging telecom reform bill, sponsored by Chairman Joe Barton (R-Texas), would allow the FCC to investigate complaints about the blocking or impairing of Internet content by broadband providers only after the fact.

Markey's amendment would have required broadband providers that set aside faster connections for new services such as video over IP to offer the same speeds to competing services. It also would have required the FCC to create an expedited process to deal with complaints.

Large broadband providers, including AT&T, Verizon and Comcast, have opposed efforts to write 'Net neutrality requirements into law, saying they're unnecessary. There have been few examples of broadband providers trying to block competing services, they say.

The amendment would have created new regulations for the Internet, Barton said. "I don't think all the Draconian things will happen that they think will happen," he said of amendment backers.

The IDG News Service is a Network World affiliate.