HP's software stock rises with Mercury buyout
$4.5b deal expected to bring more complete management package.
By
Jennifer Mears
,
Network World
, 07/31/2006
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
HP has been snapping up software companies for the past couple of years, but its plans to acquire application-management specialist Mercury Interactive should give the system vendor the boost it needs to convince customers it is serious about software, analysts say.
Last week's $4.5 billion deal also should bring a more complete management package to HP and Mercury Interactive customers
as they attempt to control applications better from development to deployment to operations.
"OpenView is very good at systems management, database management, but overall application management is something they've been lacking," says Jim Maas, solution monitoring engineer
at Fresenius Medical Care in Lexington, Mass. He is a longtime HP OpenView customer and has been looking for application-monitoring
tools to better meet the needs of about 2,400 clinics worldwide.
"Bringing in Mercury Interactive will be a good thing," he says.
Maas, who heads up the New England chapter of HP's OpenView user group, says that for the most part, HP customers are optimistic
about the acquisition, the largest since HP merged with Compaq in 2002.
"It's really wait-and-see, as far as how they're going to integrate Mercury," he says. "But, overall, it's viewed as a very
good move."
If HP is successful in merging Mercury into its corporate culture, it should find itself in a stronger position in the management
software market, where it faces competitors such as BMC Software, CA and IBM. Until now, industry experts often have questioned HP's commitment to its software business.
"HP's strategy for becoming a powerhouse in network and systems management, and their focus on the adaptive enterprise - where
you use technology to optimize business operations - has got an excellent foundation," says Richard Ptak of Ptak, Noel & Associates.
"The problem they've had in the last couple of years has been the [lack of] credibility they have as a software provider."
Comment