- Microsoft Windows chief decries standards grandstanding
- The 5 best, and 5 worst, features of Google Chrome OS
- Federal government using PS3 to crack pedophile passwords
- 10G Ethernet cheat sheet
- Top 10 free Windows tools for IT pros, at a glance
Some organizations consider taking the plunge off of big iron PBX platforms into IP telephony as being pretty daring, but that's nothing compared to what Sam Houston State University (SHSU) is doing. The south Texas school is boldly moving thousands of users off a Cisco VoIP platform to an open-source VoIP network based on Asterisk.
Good move? Discuss in our Asterisk forum.
SHSU is in the process of moving its 6,000 students, faculty and staff off of Cisco CallManager IP PBXs and a legacy Nortel Meridian PBX over to Linux servers running Asterisk, which includes call processing, voicemail and PSTN gateway functionality. The driver for this project was cost, says Aaron Daniel, senior voice analyst at Sam Houston State University.
| Aaron Daniel, senior voice analyst, Sam Houston State University. |
"We thought that it will be more cost effective in the long run to go with an open source solution, because of the massive amounts of licensing fees required to keep the Cisco CallManager network up and running," says Daniel, who this week gave a presentation on his migration project at the VON show in Boston. In the Cisco model, each phone attached to the CallManager required a separate licensing fee to operate, Daniel says. In SHSU's Asterisk/Cisco model, where it will keep its existing Cisco phones but attach them to Asterisk servers on the back end, the phone licensing costs are eliminated.
SHSU so far has moved 1,600 IP phones from Cisco CallManagers to Asterisk, which runs the IETF-standard version of SIP. The Asterisk functions are spread across six redundant Dell servers: two act as redundant PSTN gateways (and are outfitted with four-port T-1 cards from Digium, which commercially distributes Asterisk); two more servers handle call processing; another set provides voicemail.
The Cisco 7940 and 7960 IP phones the school had deployed were updated with a standard SIP software image replacing the proprietary Cisco Skinny Call Control Protocol (SCCP, or "Skinny"), which was used to connect the phones to the CallManagers. When the IP phones were upgraded with the SIP image about a month ago "all we had to do was reboot the phones," in order to register them with the Asterisk server, he says.
More control over the IP PBX software and servers was another reason SHSU made the Asterisk jump, Daniel says. "We felt we were more susceptible to hacks," since only Cisco-approved servers updates and patches could be installed on the Windows Server 2000-based CallManagers, he says. "We have a lot more peace of mind with the open-source system. If a bad exploit is found in SIP, we can fix it ourselves."
Besides the phones, Cisco gear still comprises a large chunk of the IP telephony infrastructure at SHSU. The entire WAN and LAN is based on Cisco routers and switches. The Catalyst switches already installed support power over Ethernet (for powering IP phones) as well as QoS for voice traffic. All voice traffic on the campus network runs separate from data traffic in its own VLAN segment. Additionally, Cisco VG228 gateway devices, which can connect up to 24 copper/analog phones to an VoIP network, is used in dormitories and other areas where just a basic phone is needed instead of a more costly IP handset, Daniel says.
Comments (21)
University dumps Cisco VoIP for open-source AsteriskBy Anonymous on December 5, 2006, 11:31 amVery good information, we are stuck with cisco at the moment. Re: This article.
Reply | Read entire comment
great news! someone isBy Anonymous on January 8, 2007, 3:46 amgreat news! someone is choosing a free one instead of an expensive investment after having a considerable amount of experience.
Reply | Read entire comment
Smart enough to NOT drink the Cisco KoolaidBy Anonymous on February 20, 2007, 9:58 amI am glad to see that some companies are smart enough to make alternate choices...SIP rules!!
Reply | Read entire comment
Asterisk...I'll pass.By Anonymous on February 28, 2007, 5:01 pmAs an engineer, I've had several unpleasent experiences with Asterisk. Support will continue to be an issue. I would prefer several other offerings over Asterisk...
Reply | Read entire comment
Don't be so quick to judgeBy Anonymous on February 28, 2007, 6:36 pmI bet that there are many engineers who have had several unpleasant experiences with the established vendors you mention. (I'm not sure that being an engineer has...
Reply | Read entire comment
It's all about risk managementBy Anonymous on March 8, 2007, 7:45 pmI've deployed quite a few Cisco based VoIP systems for small to large sized companies. I've also used Asterisk. There is no arguing with the fact that Asterisk...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments