- Is the Cisco MARS mission going to abort?
- First iPhone worm spreads Rick Astley wallpaper
- 10 stunning 3D buildings made with Google SketchUp
- Open source software ready for big business
- Four reasons to buy (and one reason to avoid) the Droid
As spam began evolving from a mere annoyance to a serious corporate IT concern several years ago, literally hundreds of new vendors emerged to capitalize on the business of blocking unwanted e-mail.
As promising as those start-ups seemed then, some of the most promising have been gobbled up by giant public vendors wanting to add e-mail security to their portfolio. Just as these small companies are becoming divisions of large networking giants, the task of blocking e-mail threats is being assimilated into other networking products, and experts and customers say that’s for the best.
| Done deals The Cisco-IronPort deal is the most recent example of a large, public vendor snapping up a smaller private company for its e-mail security technology: |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cisco’s plan to acquire IronPort, announced last week, is the latest example of a public network vendor buying a smaller, private company focused on blocking e-mail and Web-based threats. While the greater IT security industry is going through bouts of consolidation, the e-mail security market is particularly interesting, because these once-hungry start-ups that once touted themselves as the successful public companies of the future are disappearing into divisions of other companies.
“If anyone was going to IPO, it was going to be IronPort,” says Paul Stamp [stet], senior analyst of security at Forrester Research, adding he was somewhat surprised by the Cisco announcement.
IronPort executives often talked about leading the antispam market and building a large, profitable company. “E-mail is broken, and we're going to fix it," was the self-assigned task IronPort CEO Scott Weiss gave his company in 2004. “It’s our ball to fumble.”
A common concern when large companies snap up smaller ones in any given industry is that innovation will stall, because big vendors move more slowly than start-ups and may be less willing to take risks on developing new technology. Yet the fact that there are very few public antispam vendors could reflect the fact that spam blocking is better off as a feature, not a product.
“It does make a lot more sense for these [antispam] companies to be acquired, usually by a public company, than to go for an IPO,” says Richi Jennings], lead analyst with Ferris Research’s e-mail security practice. Pointing to the example of Symantec's acquisition of Brightmail, Jennings says Symantec now offers an integrated suite of network security that includes e-mail filtering. “They offer it as a single package so you’re not just buying it from one place, but also those customers increasingly can manage and operate all of those components from one place.”
In the case of Cisco’s acquisition, there’s plenty of opportunity for integrating IronPort’s e-mail security technology with Cisco’s network gear, according to Tom Gillis, vice president of marketing at IronPort. On Jan. 2 Gillis gave the examples of integrating Cisco’s intrusion-prevention systems with IronPort’s Web security appliance, and including IronPort’s reputation filters with Cisco switches.
Comments (1)
Antispam's assimilation: As vendors are snapped up, e-mail security gets integratedBy Anonymous on January 14, 2007, 1:01 pmBut isn't it enough to just set up Gmail account for everyone to get rid of spam completely and forever? Because Google's spam filters are the most powerful ones...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments