- FBI warns Hit Man e-mail scammer back
- 20 tech habits to improve your life
- Industry mourns slain Cisco exec
- 10 Firefox add-ons for better browsing
- Wireless LANs face scaling challenges
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Even while Cisco is suing Apple for violating its iPhone trademark, an open source enthusiast is accusing Cisco itself of infringing copyright in the same product.
Cisco has not published the source code for some components of the WIP300 iPhone in accordance with its open source licensing agreement, said Armijn Hemel, a consultant with Loohuis Consulting and half of the team running the GPL Violations Project, an organization that identifies and publicizes misuse of GPL licenses and takes some violators to court.
The WIP300 iPhone is based on Linux, and Cisco has agreed to comply with the terms of the open source GPL license in order to use the software. The GPL license requires the company to publish the code that it develops for the phone.
Industry expects say that open source software users, including companies and individuals, commonly fail to share their developments. Sometimes that’s because they may misunderstand how open-source software works, but it may also be because publishing the code can be a cumbersome and expensive process.
Hemel downloaded the firmware for the WIP300 phone and reverse-engineered it, first checking with a lawyer that such a process is legal, he said. He then discovered that Cisco has neglected to share the code for a couple of programs in the phone, including the Memory Technology Device, which is used to program the Flash memory, he said.
Hemel also found similar omissions in other Cisco products and contacted the company to arrange a meeting. "I just bombarded the Linksys contact in the Netherlands. I think they got fed up and arranged the call," he said. Linksys is a unit of Cisco.
The Cisco representatives he finally talked to in a conference call Oct. 30 were very open to his report, he said. The company subsequently fixed omissions on a few products that Hemel identified, including the EFG250 storage device as well as an Internet camera and router, he said.
But Cisco has yet to publish the relevant code from the WIP300 iPhone, Hemel said. He decided to talk about his findings now because "the timing is just perfect," he said. "For someone talking about Apple using Cisco's property, actually they're infringing on copyright themselves. So it's just a double standard."
Last week, Cisco filed a lawsuit charging Apple with trademark infringement because Apple introduced a mobile phone called the iPhone.
Hemel didn't actually identify for Cisco the specific code that hasn't been published. "I'm not going to do their work for them," he said. He suspects that a large company like Cisco might hire various programmers possibly from outsourced companies around the globe in order to create a product similar to the iPhone. That might make it difficult and potentially expensive for Cisco to properly document and account for all the code in the phone, he said.
Cisco representatives did not immediately reply to phone calls and e-mails made on Wednesday asking for comment.
If Cisco is violating the terms of the GPL license in the iPhone, it certainly isn't alone. "It occurs more frequently than we'd like to see," said Shane Coughlan, Freedom Task Force coordinator for the Free Software Foundation Europe. The problem is that many organizations don't quite fully understand the concept of free software and often don't have appropriate policies that enable them to comply with their software licensing agreements, he said.
"If you're used to buying code and used to owning it, it's difficult to understand having code that is owned by thousands," he said. "A lot of companies have been good in trying to come into compliance and figure out how sustainable compliance can be introduced in company policy."
There are repercussions to failing to comply with an open source license. The GPL Violations Project has successfully enforced 100 violations.
In addition, an individual who contributed to software that someone else fails to properly use under a license can take the licensee to court and look for financial compensation for copyright violations, said Coughlan.

Discover the capabilities your file integrity monitoring solution should have to effectively secure...
Toward More Flexible, Next-Generation Collaboration SolutionsA recent study by CIO Magazine and IDG Research Services found that while collaboration tools are...
Boost Productivity While Cutting Costs with Next-generation CollaborationIDG says that "providing employees with collaboration tools that enable them to work together...

The standard for Power over Ethernet (PoE), IEEE Std. 802.3af(tm)-2003, advanced networking,...
Intelligent Mobility: BlackBerry Technical Seminar 2008The virtual BlackBerry Technical Seminar keeps growing in popularity every year, and we want to...
Harnessing the power of communications to increase workplace performanceDue to the convergence of IT and telecommunications technologies, the business workplace has been...

WAN Ethernet services are reliable, cost-efficient offerings that are widely available and in a...
Comments (2)
GPLBy whatever on January 19, 2007, 1:48 pmI thought that Cisco went to VxWorks as they did with their routers, namely WRT54G. They had GPL in their routers and were looking for a smaller faster footprint...
Reply | Read entire comment
Cisco's iPhone violates GPL, expert saysBy Cisco Subnet on January 18, 2007, 6:00 pmApparently, this is the second time that Cisco has upset the open source community (see here). What do you make of all this? Re: This article.
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments