Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

U.S. cities don't make the intelligence cut

Pac-Rim telecom think tank names the cities that do.
By Jay Gillette , Network World , 01/24/2007
Newsletter Signup
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

HONOLULU – For the second year running, no U.S. city has made the list of the world’s top Intelligent Communities of 2007, as selected by global think tank Intelligent Community Forum. The ICF met and announced this list as part of the 29th annual Pacific Telecommunications Council (PTC) conference here in Hawaii last week.

The PTC conference, which had 4,000 attendees, features information and communications technologies, public policy initiatives, business development strategies and industry forecasts from an Asia Pacific point of view.

The ICF selects the Intelligent Community list based on how advanced the communities are in deploying broadband, building a knowledge-based workforce, combining government and private-sector “digital inclusion,” fostering innovation and marketing economic development.

As announced by ICF chairman John Jung, the intelligent city finalists are:

• Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom
• Gangnam District, Seoul, South Korea
• Issy-les-Moulineaux, France
• Ottawa-Gatineau, Ontario-Quebec, Canada
• Sunderland, Tyne & Wear, United Kingdom
• Tallinn, Estonia
• Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

The Most Intelligent Community of the Year will be announced in May in New York. The 2006 winner was Taipei. The closest U.S. city to this list was Cleveland, which was a semifinalist last year.

China IT leaders looking outward

Chinese telecom vendors, facing fierce domestic competition with dropping revenues and profit margins, are shifting their focus to international markets, said one Chinese analyst presenting at the conference.

According to Dongming.Zhang, research director of Beijing-based BDA China, China’s leading equipment provider, Huawei, is generating 65% of its annualized $10 billion revenue in overseas ventures.

With 44,000 employees, Huawei fights for its largest single share of China’s crowded domestic communications equipment market — reaching just 16%. Ericsson is next with 10%, followed by Motorola, Nortel, IBM, Alcatel, Siemens, Cisco and others dividing single digit slices of the market.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

NetScout and analyst Jim Metzler have teamed to deliver a series of IT Briefs on Network and Application Performance Management leveraging research from NetScout's nGenius & Sniffer users.

www.netscout.com

Metzler on Service Delivery Management

Delivering IT business value by evolving our thinking from managing application performance to focusing on services.

Learn More

2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

Successful IT organizations must know how to make the right application delivery decisions in these tough economic times.

Download the Handbook

Metzler on the Modern IP Network

Discusses the growing emphasis on network management and the need to implement a holistic view of the end-to-end experience of the user.

Read the Brief

Comments (20)
Login
Forgot your account info?

thats why tech support inBy Anonymous on October 31, 2007, 1:09 pmthats why tech support in india for dell was so great right.. nice try, I don't believe in this media bias against the US.. we invented everything you use here... again.....

Reply | Read entire comment

re:IntelligentBy tjma2001 on January 27, 2007, 5:57 amYes I have to agree with you. Its simply hillarious reading all these claims by Americans claiming to be so smart and having such brilliant tertiary institutions,...

Reply | Read entire comment

the use of the wordBy Anonymous on January 26, 2007, 4:41 pmthe use of the word "intelligent" is misleading. They use a specific criteria in declaring the most "intelligent" cities. Again, the article and word usage sucks....

Reply | Read entire comment

In response to "I do not know what their.."By Anonymous on January 25, 2007, 6:21 pmRe-read the criteria, you numbnut. This is for communications. Not warfare. Obviously the U.S. Government lack the iniative in improving its communication network,...

Reply | Read entire comment

Interesting. Most of theBy Anonymous on January 25, 2007, 5:20 pmInteresting. Most of the people who were "intelligent" enough to comment on this article apparently didn't read the article, just the headline.

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed