Daylight-saving changes: No Y2K, but there could be headaches
Cisco, Microsoft and others warning customers of needed preparations
By
Jennifer Mears
,
Network World
, 01/25/2007
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
At first blush it may seem like no big deal: clocks will move ahead by an hour three weeks earlier than usual this year. But
for today’s networked businesses, the simple change could mean complex problems if IT shops aren’t prepared, industry experts
say.
The trouble goes beyond missed meetings and messed-up schedules to errors within time-reliant applications that are critical
to a company’s business — processes such as operating room scheduling, billing and contract deadlines and ensuring record
compliance, for example, could be at risk. Any applications dependent on timestamps will run into trouble after March 11,
the new day for the daylight-saving time change, if actions aren’t taken.
For more than two decades, daylight-saving time has begun on the first Sunday of April and reverted to standard time on the
last Sunday in October. But beginning this year, due to the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the daylight-saving schedule will be
extended by a month, with the period beginning on the second Sunday in March and ending on the first Sunday in November. Legislators
backing the change say it will save some 100,000 barrels of oil a day.
But the change also could throw a wrench in IT systems set up to automatically handle the old daylight-saving schedule. As
a result, IT professionals need to take a close look at their systems and applications to determine which could be off when
the change occurs and then take the necessary steps to correct them.
“My fear is that a lot of people aren’t going to realize this is a big issue until months down the road when they say, 'Oops,
why aren’t these dates lining up,’” says Scott Metzger, CTO at consumer credit management firm TrueCredit in San Luis Obispo,
Calif.
Partner Content
Blue Stripe Software
www.bluestripe.com/
Improving Application Performance Troubleshooting
Diagnosing why an application is slow is hard, at times taking days or weeks to isolate and resolve. This paper explains the challenges involved using current management tools, provides a 'wish list' for application management and analysis, and explains the need for an application system-wide approach that monitors entire applications, not components.
Download Whitepaper
Virtual Vigilance: Managing Application Performance in Virtual Environments
This paper highlights the impact of virtualization on application performance. "Managing Application Performance in Virtual Environments" states: "Best-in-Class organizations are predominately taking actions around improving visibility across both physical and virtual systems, assessing the business impact of application performance and understanding interdependencies of applications in virtualized environments."
Download Whitepaper
Application Service Requests: The Missing Link for Pragmatic ITSM
Forrester Research analyst Glenn O'Donnell and BlueStripe co-founder Vic Nyman discuss a breakthrough approach to application problem management. Learn the new approach for ITSM problem management, which provides: Rapid isolation of application slow-downs to specific components for quick problem resolution, 24/7 monitoring for proactive notification of potential issues before end users are impacted and much more.
Register for Webcast
Comments (25)
Daylight Saving changes: No Y2K, but there could be headachesBy Anonymous on January 26, 2007, 12:00 amRich Debrino, CIO for Everett, Wash.-based Advances in Technology, which handles IT for a variety of healthcare organizations, including parent company Compass Health,...
Reply | Read entire comment
Daylight Savings TimeBy Bob Wells on January 26, 2007, 10:13 amI remember setting up Novell 3.12 servers back years ago and one of the options was to specify the rollback and roll forward times for DST. Why hasn't Microsoft...
Reply | Read entire comment
Not freeBy Eric Cassol on January 26, 2007, 10:38 amYou mentioned that Microsoft has prepared an update for Windows 2000. This is somewhat true, they do have a patch but they will be charging for it. the same goes...
Reply | Read entire comment
Manual UpdateBy Anonymous on January 26, 2007, 1:12 pmSee Microsoft Knowledge Base Article 914387
Reply | Read entire comment
On the Sun side of this issue ..By Paul McNamara on January 26, 2007, 3:45 pmLots of Sun-specific info and links here:
Reply | Read entire comment
Yep, it's scary how twoBy Anonymous on January 26, 2007, 7:27 pmYep, it's scary how two Chief Information Officers are making such authoritative statements and also that they're in health care to boot. Dudes, Windows syncs...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments