- How to make new stuff from your piles of obsolete tech
- Why your computer sucks
- 10 recession-proof IT skills
- Juniper execs share network vision
- 9-year-old plots his fifth Microsoft certification
The IEEE wants to make idle or underutilized Ethernet connections more energy efficient, which could mean huge electrical cost savings for large enterprises. The trick: finding a way to seamlessly throttle between 10Mbps and 10Gbps.
The standards outfit recently formed an Energy Efficient Ethernet (EEE) study group to explore how to do this. The idea is to save power in PCs and laptops (most of which ship with GigE cards now) when LAN links are idle, or not utilizing full bandwidth. Researchers estimate that U.S. companies could collectively save $450 million a year in power costs by using such a technology.
The study group is essentially refiguring the process of auto-negotiation — a link-detection technology in Ethernet, where a switch and NIC determine what speeds are supported (10/100/1000Mbps) and establish the link rate. EEE would make this a more real-time process on Ethernet networks. For instance, a GigE-enabled laptop would switch to 10Mbps when idle, maybe 100Mbps during low-bandwidth activities, such as e-mail or Web surfing, and burst to 1000Mbps when downloading large files or streaming video.
"There's lots to take on with this effort," says Mike Bennett, senior network engineer at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, and chair of the EEE Study Group.
One challenge is finding a way to make a PC or laptop network interface card (NIC) change gears more quickly — "a couple orders of magnitude faster than auto-negotiation, to make the switch as seamless as possible," Bennett says. "Auto-negotiation runs at about 1.4 seconds and we're talking about — just to start the discussion — a millisecond of switching time."
EEE technology will have to work on both ends of a link to be successful, Bennett says. "When one device signals a speed change to another, the device would have to stop transmitting frames and tell the other end of the link, 'Hey, we're going to do a speed change here.'" The challenge with that is there are standard buffering sizes for Ethernet gear, he adds.
"Vendors build devices differently. Some have lots of buffers, some don't," he says.
If the IEEE and equipment vendors can figure all of this out, the savings could be huge for large organizations with thousands of Ethernet ports in PCs, servers and other devices, Bennett says.
Dropping a NIC's connection speed from 1000Mbps to 10Mbps could lower the device's power consumption from about 4W to around .60W. Considering the hundreds or thousands of networked machines running in some enterprises, this power savings could be significant, EEE proponents say.
Presentations given at EEE Study Group meetings cite a 2002 Department of Energy study estimating that the total power consumption of enterprise IT equipment in U.S. offices at around 97 terawatt hours per year, which translates to around $8 billion per year in energy costs. Extrapolating that cost over time, and accounting for network-related power consumption, the study group came up with the estimate of $450 million per year.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications."' Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (6)
Not using all of that GigE pipe? Save some energyBy mjbennett on February 2, 2007, 11:44 amPhil - nice article, thanks. I do want to point out that I said auto-negotiation takes 1.4 seconds, not "about 1 to 4 seconds". I know AN is slow, but not that...
Reply | Read entire comment
Lower power?By Anonymous on February 4, 2007, 8:15 pmHow, exactly, does dropping the speed of ethernet drop the power consumption? Do ethernet NICs *really* use less power when running slower (or do they just idle...
Reply | Read entire comment
Apples and grapesBy Mike in Michigan on February 5, 2007, 11:40 amAmazing. But I suspect that if large enterprises were to turn off some of the decorative lighting on their buildings or perhaps turn off every other light...
Reply | Read entire comment
Dubious savings calculationsBy Geoff Strickler on February 5, 2007, 5:43 pmThose savings numbers might be valid in theory, but they fail to account for several critical factors: 1. While most new machines ship with 1Gb Ethernet ports,...
Reply | Read entire comment
Auto-Neg is dependent onBy Anonymous on December 20, 2007, 7:31 pmAuto-Neg is dependent on adapter vendor/type. I've see some adapters display link jitter for which an added driver delay is required to stabilize the line before...
Reply | Read entire comment
Re: Dubious savings calculationsBy Anonymous on December 20, 2007, 7:46 pm3) Disagree - What is being addressed here is the inactive non-bursty traffic times. Latency sensitive applications are transactional (DB record) vs. stream...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments