- Google Earth used to predict electrical problems
- Kaminsky: Many ways to attack with DNS
- Tools to evade China's Web censorship
- Procter & Gamble's Cisco TelePresence experience
- Adobe warns of fake Flash installers
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Apple, long a ghost in the corporate-infrastructure mainstream, is beginning to cast a shadow as IT departments discover Mac platforms that are being transformed into realistic alternatives to Windows and Linux.
Is Mac OS ready for the enterprise? Vote and discuss.
A number of factors are helping raise the eyebrows of those responsible for upgrading desktops and servers: for example, Apple’s shift to the Intel architecture; the inclusion of infrastructure and interoperability hooks, such as directory services in the Mac OS X Server; dual-boot capabilities; clustering and storage technology; third-party virtualization software; and comparison shopping, which is being fostered by migration costs and hardware overhauls associated with Microsoft’s Vista.
Despite these goodies, however, Apple isn’t pushing into corporations with a defined desktop strategy. The company still does not have a formal division focused on developing software for the enterprise or supporting it. And it refused Network World’s requests to discuss its plans for enterprise customers.
“Because of the switch to Intel, success of the Mac OS X, the stability and elegance of the platform, the Mac is a very viable alternative, but it would require a dramatic shift in the company’s resource allocation to go after the enterprise,” says Van Baker, an analyst with Gartner.
IT shops that have dipped their toes in Apple’s pool of desktop and server platforms say others should test the water.
“Intel Macs have really changed things. Beyond the obvious comparisons — that Macs are now speed-parity with Wintel machines — vendors have been able to develop more software for the platform, and where that is impossible, virtual machines are always an option,” says Scott Melendez, manager of enterprise messaging for the city and county of San Francisco, who brought Macs into governmental offices in 2003 and says they are there to stay alongside Windows machines.
“There will always be a stigma by some old-time network managers — that Macs are difficult to network — from the AppleTalk days, or that they are difficult to support because it’s not Windows. By the end of 2007, however, I think the landscape will have changed,” Melendez says.
It’s a heady prediction, because Mac’s share of the desktop market has been hovering around 4% since 2000 and isn’t expected to change through 2010, IDC says. IDC’s numbers for Mac are worse in the server market, where the Mac OS X Server’s share is well below 1% vs. other options.
Partner Content
CA Network & Voice Resource Center
Comprehensive Network & Voice Management Visit CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center and get insights into industry best practices, information that helps you to address your challenges.
CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center
Managing Voice Over IP for Successful Convergence
Voice over IP (VoIP) has much to offer in cost savings but some customers have concerns about VoIP call quality compared to the quality of traditional voice services. This white paper will help you learn how to take the right steps so that voice quality is assured.
Managing VoIP for Successful Convergence
The Changing Face of Network Management
Managing your network is serious business. This paper discusses the benefits of integrating configuration change-awareness into your network fault management solution
Download Whitepaper
Comments (72)
Apple is not ready for the EnterpriseBy Frustrated Apple Engineer on June 16, 2007, 7:22 pmFirst, I am in the US and work in IT for a huge Enterprise network. I need to work with *all* operating systems: Windows, Novell SUSE, Apple, Solaris in both server...
Reply | Read entire comment
Amen! Ignoring preferenceBy Anonymous on June 8, 2007, 1:08 pmAmen! Ignoring preference of one OS over another, I'd want to know why I not only have to pay several times more for Windows, but have to pay for the right to connect...
Reply | Read entire comment
I'm a bit puzzled by theBy Anonymous on June 8, 2007, 1:01 pmI'm a bit puzzled by the math here. If windows and os x cost the same amount, it would make sense for the macs to cost five times as much to keep up to date as...
Reply | Read entire comment
Apple's Supposed Enterprise ReadinessBy Al Snyder on June 7, 2007, 9:09 pmBefore buying into an Apple server platform, check out the tools available for disaster recovery. Three weeks ago, our Apple mail server developed a corrupt database....
Reply | Read entire comment
No freak'n way.By Anonymous on June 7, 2007, 4:38 pmI would be ashamed to use a MAC server in a big, corporate network.
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments