- More porn sneaks onto the iPhone
- 'Swatting' case shows need to ban caller-ID spoofing
- Why the iPhone can't be "killed"
- Nortel enterprise chief wants to bring back Bay
- US sets final emergency responder wireless pilot
Google's board of directors has recommended shareholders next week vote down a proposal that would require the company to legally resist government censorship efforts and to notify users when the company is required by governments to censor search results.
The proposal was submitted by New York City's Office of the Comptroller, which helps oversee the New York City Employees’ Retirement System, the New York City Teachers’ Retirement System, the New York City Police Pension Fund, and the New York City Fire Department Pension Fund, and is a custodian of the New York City Board of Education Retirement System.
Combined, these funds hold 486,617 shares of Google stock, a stake worth about $228.2 million.
Censorship has been a sore point for Google. The company -- which uses "don't be evil" as its corporate mantra -- was widely criticized last year for launching a Chinese search engine that censored results. In defense of the company's decision to launch the Google.cn search engine, Chairman and CEO Eric Schmidt said the company had weighed the pros and cons of censorship.
"We concluded that although we weren't wild about the restrictions, it was even worse to not try to serve those users at all," Schmidt said, speaking at the 2006 World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland. "We actually did an evil scale and decided not to serve at all was worse evil."
The Office of the Comptroller's proposal argues that the freedom to access information on the Internet is guaranteed by the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
"Technology companies in the United States such as Google, that operate in countries controlled by authoritarian governments have an obligation to comply with the principles of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights," the proposal said, naming Belarus, Burma, China, Cuba, Egypt, Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam as countries where governments restrict access to Internet content.
To protect the freedom to access information on the Internet, the proposal sets out six policies for Google to implement. These include: not hosting user data in countries where political speech can be considered a crime; not engaging in proactive censorship; using legal means to avoid censorship and only censoring information when required by legally binding procedures; informing users when agreeing to a government censorship request; educating users about Google's data retention policies; and making public information about all legal censorship requests that Google complies with.
Comments (6)
Dont be evil?By Degriz on May 8, 2007, 8:39 amKissing up to opressive regimes...So how is that not? Time to start using another engine imo
Reply | Read entire comment
American companies shouldn't support tyrannyBy Bob Camp on May 3, 2007, 10:09 amI could write for hours on this topic, but I'll try to keep it short and succinct. If Google wants to remain an American company, they should stay true to the...
Reply | Read entire comment
The lesser of two evils is still evilBy Anonymous on May 3, 2007, 10:07 amChoosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil. There's nothing wrong with pursuing profit, until you put that pursuit before principle. I haven't used...
Reply | Read entire comment
Google supporting oppression?By Anonymous on May 2, 2007, 5:50 pmI have a lot of admiration for Google's innovation, products and services. These traits have helped Google become the most powerful brand on the internet and as...
Reply | Read entire comment
Ah the greed monstere shows it's head at GoogleBy Anonymous on May 2, 2007, 4:36 pmSo the "do no evil" line is falling to the "make more money" thoughts. Why not fight censorship? Well obviously they don’t have to justify their reasoning to...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments