Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Hilf: Microsoft won't sue over Linux, for now

By Jeremy Kirk , IDG News Service , 05/17/2007
Newsletter Signup
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Microsoft ignited hostility following its assertion in Fortune magazine on Monday that Linux and other open-source software infringe on 235 of the company's patents. The software giant, which signed a controversial patent cross-licensing deal with Novell last November, is encouraging other companies to reach licensing agreements to resolve intellectual property claims. It has made companies nervous about whether they could eventually be targeted by lawsuits from Microsoft.

In an exclusive interview, Bill Hilf, general manager of platform strategy and director of Microsoft's work with open-source projects, spoke with IDG News Service on the effects of the declaration on the open-source community. Before joining Microsoft, Hilf was in charge of IBM's Linux and open-source technical strategy and spent the last 12 years working with open source software. What follows is an edited transcript of the interview.

IDG News Service: The Fortune story has caused a lot of concern over how Microsoft may proceed in regard to its patent claims. Did you know Microsoft officials were going to reveal the number of patents?

Hilf: We did. [But] the Fortune article does not correctly represent our strategy. That's what has people so inflamed. It looks like our strategy changed and we are moving in a new direction, but it hasn't. In the Novell deal, we said we had to figure out a way to solve these IP issues and we needed to figure out a way for better interoperability with open-source products. The Fortune article makes it look like we are going out on this litigation path.

Our strategy from everyone in the company -- from [Steve] Ballmer to Brad Smith to me and everyone in between -- has always been to license and not litigate as it relates to our intellectual property. So we have no plans to litigate. You can never say we'll never do anything in the future, but that's not our strategy. That article spins it on the attack. The only new piece information in that article is that it just put a number on the patents.

IDGNS: What was the aftermath after the story ran?

Hilf: The people in the open-source community that I know well . . . they contacted me right away. All of the European guys I know called me at 2 a.m. I told them what I told you. They said "Okay, that’s what I needed to hear." The other question I got was, to be very honest, "Do you have a different strategy than the company?" which I didn't understand at first. I said again, "Don't look at Fortune magazine as the manifestation of the Microsoft strategy." It's the same strategy we've had. I think [the effects of the story] will be short term as people realize that it looks like Microsoft is on the attack. I think longer term it will be fine and the work will continue on.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

Explore the Ultrium Edge

The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.

Find Out More

Disk and Tape Square Off

Discover what disk and tape really cost and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization

Download this White Paper

Don't Fall for the Myths

The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.

Review this information

information examination

An examination of information security issues, methods and securing data with LTO-4 tape drive encryption

Read this analysis

Comments (8)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Just one word ...By TomS on July 30, 2007, 5:22 pmJust one word ... - - Estoppel More properly "Estoppel by acquiescence". See Wikipedia for an explanation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estoppel In this...

Reply | Read entire comment

Microsoft stole most of it's technologies from open-source and pBy Anonymous on May 20, 2007, 4:03 pm This is crazy. Most of these Open-Source Technologies came out BEFORE damn Microsoft. Matter of fact, Microsoft stole most of it's technologies from open-source...

Reply | Read entire comment

This is crazy. Most ofBy Anonymous on May 20, 2007, 4:02 pm This is crazy. Most of these Open-Source Technologies came out BEFORE damn Microsoft. Matter of fact, Microsoft stole most of it's technologies from open-source...

Reply | Read entire comment

I don't think you get it...By Anonymous on May 18, 2007, 10:37 am"Intellectual property is intellectual property. If you use someone else's technology and justify it by calling it "open source", that's like justifying robbing...

Reply | Read entire comment

And you believe in patents?By Me on May 18, 2007, 9:46 amWhat have software patents done but antagonize users, companies and everyone else in between? Not to mention that actually pursuing patent claims through the courts...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed