Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Amero school-porn case raises questions of classroom computers, spyware

By Ellen Messmer , Network World , 05/22/2007
Newsletter Signup
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

As she awaits a possible 40-year prison term, the case of Julie Amero, the substitute teacher in eastern Connecticut convicted of exposing seventh-graders to Internet porn, has gained national attention from school IT administrators.

From the start, Amero has protested that she’s innocent, contending that spyware hijacked her classroom computer in explaining the pornographic pop-ups that some seventh-graders at Kelly Middle School saw on Oct. 19, 2004. However, a jury last January convicted Amero on four counts of risk of injury to a minor. She awaits sentencing June 6, having turned down a plea deal in which she could have avoided prison.

(Read what Mark Gibbs has to say about the Amero case.)

Some IT administrators for K-12 schools say they’re inclined to believe that spyware did hijack Amero’s network-based computer to display the pornographic pop-ups. That’s because on the high-speed LANs that connect their schools to the Internet, these IT administrators find themselves going into battle against spyware-controlled computers even when these computers are up-to-date on malware detection and patching.

“I can’t believe they brought these charges against her,” says Tom Sims, director of network services for Miami-Dade Public Schools, which has 375,000 students and 90,000 desktops that students use.

Sims believes that Amero, who herself reported the computer’s strange porn pop-up-displaying behavior, is being falsely accused. “She’s a victim of spyware taking over the computer to cause this to happen.”

Transcripts of Amero’s trial indicate that prosecutors questioned why she didn’t turn off the computer when it began displaying porn. She responded she had been told not to turn the computer off. After the jury’s guilty verdict, one juror publicly stated that he faulted her for not throwing her coat over the computer or unplugging it.

Sims notes that Miami-Dade has had similar computer-related events that prompted investigations, but they had never ended in criminal prosecution.

He added there was a problem once years ago when a teacher who was “a bona fide nudist” was looking at nudist images while giving a test to his classroom students, and some glimpsed what was on his computer. The teacher was fired and had his teaching credentials revoked.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Comments (14)
Login
Forgot your account info?

She's getting a new trialBy Adam Gaffin on June 6, 2007, 11:10 amTeacher granted new trial in pornographic pop-up case.

Reply | Read entire comment

Amero School Porn CaseBy uvula245 on May 30, 2007, 10:53 pmWouldn't the prosecutor have had to prove criminal intent? That is, that Mrs. Amero intentionally placed the objectionable images herself, or had a computer expert...

Reply | Read entire comment

Welcome to the United NaziBy Anonymous on May 29, 2007, 4:27 pmWelcome to the United Nazi States of America. This is exactly what police states, ie dictatorships, do to their citizens. Make them all fearful of each other, then...

Reply | Read entire comment

Amero school pornBy Eliza Doolittle on May 26, 2007, 11:57 pmMy advice: steer clear of eastern Connecticut. Those jurers are still loose.

Reply | Read entire comment

Eastern ConnecticutBy Non Compos Mentis on May 26, 2007, 11:51 pmThese people in eastern Connecticut must be simple minded. No jury here in NY would convict this womnan. The people of NY have more sense.

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed