For the price of $8.2 billion, private equity firms Silver Lake and TPG Capital have offered to take Avaya private. This is the largest such transaction ever in the enterprise networking and communications arena. And it’s a positive development for Avaya’s shareholders, employees and most importantly its customers.
Why a social networking strategy is needed
02/09/10
When I'm not being a journalist and leaping wide clauses in a single bound or moving faster than a speeding cursor, I adopt my alternate persona: Mark Gibbs, mild-mannered consultant. Well, perhaps not so mild-mannered.
Victoria to tip in $3M to spy on bushfires
02/09/10
Victoria’s troubled bushfire alert system may be bolstered with a fleet of fire-detection cameras after a $3 million government trial announced today is completed.
The 12 most popular newsletters of all time
02/09/10
This week will be the final week of the Network Architecture newsletter as penned by me. Before we say goodbye in Thursday's issue, I'd like to take a fond look back at the biggest hits.
When the rumors started to spread that Avaya was up for sale, Cisco and Nortel were mentioned as potential buyers.
I never did think that Nortel would or could step up to buy Avaya, because it simply did not make sense. The financials could not work for Nortel, which carries a market cap of only $11.5 billion. Most importantly, the product overlap is huge, and integrating the two companies is well beyond the resources available to the Nortel executive staff at the moment.
An Avaya-Nortel deal would have been Cisco’s best-case scenario, since it would have taken a year plus for Avaya and Nortel to figure out and implement a rationalization plan. Cisco would have used that time for winning deals so customers would not have to endure product end-of-life risk and uncertainly.
I did think that an Avaya and Cisco combination could work. Yes, there is overlap on the IP telephony space, but Cisco is often knocked because it does not have a backward migration offering. Also, Cisco would have picked up a large and loyal customer base, as well as being provided with entry into the high-end contact center market. Perhaps Cisco is not sold on communications-enabled business processes, which is Avaya’s future as it now has the environment to fully develop into a software and services concern.
So what do Avaya’s stakeholders get from this transaction? Louis J. D'Ambrosio, Avaya's president and CEO, has been busy resetting the culture button at Avaya while surrounding himself with an experienced executive management team from the software industry.
He has added Jocelyne J. Attal, from IBM’s Websphere, as chief marketing officer; Charlie Ill as senior vice president, Global Sales, formerly president of Sales at BEA Systems; Stuart Wells from Sun Microsystems is senior vice president, Global Communications Solutions running the entire Avaya product offering portfolio. The recruitment of software executives into Avaya is happening at all levels, not just at the executive management ranks.
Note: Register to have your user name appear; otherwise your comment will show up as "Anonymous."
*Anonymous comments will only appear once they are approved by the moderator.
Copyright 2008 Network World Inc.
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
Re: Why Avaya deal is good for customers By Anonymous on June 8, 2007, 6:27 am Reply | Read entire comment Another balanced report from Nick Lippis. Just look at http://www.lippisreport.com/, see who advertises there and make up your mind on these comments re Nortel's...
All comments (1)