- How to make new stuff from your piles of obsolete tech
- Why your computer sucks
- 10 recession-proof IT skills
- Juniper execs share network vision
- 9-year-old plots his fifth Microsoft certification
Early adopters of Microsoft’s new Vista operating system are reporting problems with its implementation of IPv6, a long-anticipated upgrade to the Internet’s primary protocol.
IPv6 supports a 128-bit addressing scheme, which lets it support an order-of-magnitude more devices that are directly connected to the Internet than its predecessor, IPv4. IPv6 also has autoconfiguration, end-to-end security and other enhancements.
Where eight network management vendors stand on IPv6
IPv6 management tools lacking
Vista supports IPv6 by default. Vista runs a single-stack, dual-IP-layer architecture, which means it is IPv4- and IPv6-capable out of the box. It supports tunneling of IPv6 traffic over an IPv4 backbone and includes IPSec that works for both IPv4 and IPv6.
Network management software vendors and users are reporting problems with Vista’s IPv6 implementation.
“Vista is showing some serious deficiencies around IPv6 and IPv4 insofar as their compliance or the transparency of their compliance around IP behaviors,” says Loki Jorgenson, chief scientist for Apparent Networks, a provider of network assessment and optimization tools.
“For example, Vista doesn’t expose any of the [Internet Control Message Protocol] errors to applications running on Vista,” Jorgenson says. “The application can’t get access to that message, and subsequently all it sees is that the network connection is not working. This is a big challenge for us around Vista. It’s not clear at all why IPv6 isn’t properly supported in this regard.”
Duane Murphy, president of Managed Information Services in Long Beach, Calif., says he has experienced problems with Vista’s IPv6 implementation on the networks he runs for law firms. Murphy used Network Instruments' Observer 12 application, which supports IPv6, to isolate Vista’s IPv6 problems.
“We are seeing a number of applications that are IP-based that do not like the addressing scheme of IPv6,” Murphy says. “We will send a print job to an IP-based printer, and the print job becomes corrupted. We’re seeing this with Window’s Vista machines. When IPv6 is installed, this happens without fail. As soon as we remove IPv6, all of our printer functions return to normal.”
Murphy says the printing problem has cropped up on 45 Dell Latitudes and Dimensions running Vista Business or Vista Ultimate.
“We’re also seeing loss of network connections on IP when you have both IPv6 and IPv4 loaded on the same machine with an IPv4-based network,” Murphy says. “As soon as we remove IPv6, we suddenly have connectivity to the rest of the local workstations.”
Murphy says he believes the problems stem from Vista’s IPv6 implementation.
“We are connecting Observer to the monitoring port of a Cisco or HP switch, which allows us to monitor all the traffic across the network,” Murphy says. “We figure out the name of each workstation, then we do a protocol analysis to figure out what protocols are running across the network. Once we do the protocol analysis, we can drill down on IPv6 and figure out what’s wrong.”
Comments (16)
Vista not playing well with IPv6By Microsoft Subnet on June 7, 2007, 1:32 pmUsers are complaining of specific instances where Vista's dual IPv4/IPv6 support is causing headaches. One user notes that ICMP errors aren't exposed to applications...
Reply | Read entire comment
IPv6 is not the standard yet.........By James Hinks on June 7, 2007, 2:31 pmSo why run both is my question and why does vista install both automatically? I can see if the IPv4 standard was going away in a year but it is not so I recommend...
Reply | Read entire comment
That is what you get for being an early adopterBy Joe Vincent on June 7, 2007, 6:03 pmYour desire to be on the bleeding edge, caused you this issue. While Microsoft is for sure to blame for lack of R&D, it's also your neck on the line for recommending...
Reply | Read entire comment
Vista, IPv6, and printing experienceBy David Green on June 7, 2007, 9:09 pmWe've been running a native IPv6 network in our enterprise since early 2006 and had Vista integrated since last fall and never encountered a printing problem. We...
Reply | Read entire comment
Specific Individual Problems?By Leo Boulton on June 8, 2007, 8:37 amWhy have a two page report of users complaining about a printing application? It is clear that this will be fixed in SP1, or something...
Reply | Read entire comment
Questionable reportingBy Anonymous on June 8, 2007, 12:29 pmI do not see how this article points to Windows Vista IPv6 problems. This article mainly exposes somebody's problems with IPv6 deployments. I didn't hear that they...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments