Microsoft, IBM feel heat from Google Apps
Vendors say Google offering will offer strong competition in enterprise market
By
Jon Brodkin
,
Network World
, 06/20/2007
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Microsoft and IBM executives Wednesday admitted feeling heat from Google now that the Web search giant is trying to make inroads into the enterprise market with its hosted suite of communication
and collaboration tools.
Google Apps, a hosted service, is gaining traction primarily in universities but is a welcome addition to enterprise software because
of its simplicity and ease of use, said Rob Curry, director of Microsoft’s Office business platform group, during a panel
discussion today at the Enterprise 2.0 conference in Boston.
“We actually see [Google] as a great competitor in this space,” Curry said. “And they bring a good spirit in terms of simplicity,
ease of use and things we’re trying to leverage as we go forward in our development cycle.”
Google Apps was described as a “direct shot at Microsoft Office” by Forrester Analyst Erica Driver when Google released an enterprise version of the tool in February. For $50 per user per
year, customers get e-mail, instant messaging, a calendar tool, a Web page creator, support for e-mail on BlackBerry mobile devices and integration with Google Docs & Spreadsheets. Analysts say Google Apps offers less functionality than Office but is less
expensive.
IBM, which offers the Lotus Notes set of e-mail, calendaring and collaborative applications, and Lotus Sametime, an IM and Web conferencing tool, has partnered with Google but still sees the company as a potential competitor. Lotus Sametime
allows IM customers to communicate with users of Google Talk.
“We’re a key partner of Google’s,” said Ken Bisconti, vice president of messaging and collaboration software for IBM, during
the panel discussion. “We partner with them, and continue to partner with them, hopefully for the good of our customers. I
also fully expect them to become a competitor to us in the business space.”
Google executives are busy trying to understand the requirements of enterprises, a learning process that will be crucial if
the search company hopes to gain market traction for Google Apps outside of academia, Bisconti said.
“Most of our customers tell us they’re talking to the Google enterprise team,” he said. “Google is doing a good job of collecting
information to understand enterprise requirements. … I don’t see them as a near-term competitor but as a long-term potential
substitution.”
No Google officials participated in the panel. The session, titled “Vendor Spotlight: Assessing IBM & Microsoft Platforms
for Collaboration & Unified Communications,” also gave the vendors a chance to discuss the broad trend in which employees
expect the types of instant communication available to them in their personal lives.
This is placing increased important on IM, Web conferencing, video and audio conferencing, and mobile communications.
“The role of instant messaging has completely transformed and it has become a business expectation,” said Akiba Saeedi, IBM's
program director for unified communications and collaboration products.
Years ago, people questioned whether e-mail would become a necessary business function. No one would question e-mail’s importance
today, and IM seems to be heading in a similar direction, Saeedi said.
Comments (3)
I simply can't see the value in hosted 'desktop' applicationsBy Anonymous on June 21, 2007, 11:52 amI simply can't see the value in hosted "desktop" applications. Re: Microsoft, IBM feel heat from Google Apps. Response time and accessibility are...
Reply | Read entire comment
A Matter of TrustBy Anonymous on June 21, 2007, 2:15 pmI personally would not trust an application that operates through Google. The application could give them copies of all my work - much as they brazenly keep and...
Reply | Read entire comment
Trust, performance, and ubiquityBy Anonymous on June 21, 2007, 2:52 pmRight on - Google is less trustworthy of my data than Microsoft or IBM as far as I'm concerned. I wouldn't call the web browser an interface "of choice." It's...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments