- Chinese Internet censorship: An inside look
- Desktops of the future here today
- What network CEOs really make
- DoD sold counterfeit network gear
- Sci-Fi's goofiest gadgets and technology
Don't get 'Green Scammed'. Listen now!
Cisco opens ISR routers to developers; SaaS providers cut costs with open source. Listen now!
The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) is a set of industry regulations imposed by the major credit card companies to ensure the safety, security, and integrity of cardholder data. Any business that processes, stores, and transmits cardholder account data must comply with this complex new standard, and must be able to demonstrate that compliance through automated and manual audits of their systems. This white paper looks at the key challenges and requirements of PCI DSS as it relates to Microsoft Windows and Active Directory, and shows you how a third-party software solution can help with PCI compliance.
Get the latest on storage technologies that allow IT professionals to better cope with new IT demands. Learn how storage technologies can help you successfully tackle e-Discover, regulatory compliance, green data center initiatives and the data explosion. Get all the details now.
There are many compelling reasons for virtualizing Windows and Linux applications. Virtualization improves server utilization by allowing you to run multiple workloads on a single physical server. It reduces the number of physical servers you have to maintain, while allowing you to use less physical space and power while still improving scalability. All of these capabilities translate directly into lower costs, less complexity, and greater flexibility in your mixed IT environment. Register below to learn more and be entered to win an Archos 605 Portable Media Player.
Enterasys Sentinel is now known as Enterasys NAC - see http://www.enterasys.com/products/advanced-security-apps/enterasys-network-access.aspx...- Anonymous
The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.
Discover what disk and tape really cost -- and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization
The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.
Over two thirds of disk-only users look to add tape back into storage infrastructure according to recent survey.
This article was contributed by a reader. If you have an opinion or technology experience you would like to share, contact Online Community Editor Julie Bort at bort@nww.com.
Energy conservation is one of the most overlooked ways a company can boost its bottom line without adding staff, space or operating hours. But you’ll need to do a great job of selling for your “green” projects to survive the budget review process. Too often, conservation projects are viewed as nice and optional things to do, rather than as serious savings opportunities. That will change in a heartbeat once you articulate the financial benefits.
One reason the value of conservation projects tends to be minimized is because of the way they are presented to management. Typically, such projects are sold on simple payback, in which the capital cost is divided by the (undiscounted) annual energy savings, resulting in a payback period of years. One problem with this approach is that many managers insist on a payback of less than three years to green-light capital projects not directly related to production. This criterion greatly limits the range of conservation opportunities available. With this method, for instance, an air conditioning system upgrade that costs $20,000 and will save $5,000 per year will have a simple payback of four years. That’s not a financial measurement that’s going to wow them in the boardroom.
A more sophisticated analysis might look at comparative life-cycle costs to develop a net present value (NPV). The NPV shows the positive (or negative) cost of a long-term project in today’s dollars, and is a good way to compare two projects. In this case, the NPV of the green project then would be compared to maintaining the status quo.
The good news about the NPV approach is that it does a better job of showing the value of long-lasting conservation upgrades. The downside is that it requires quite a bit more economic savvy to develop. Surprisingly, I also have found it requires more economic savvy to grasp and often isn’t well understood by management. (In fact, I once analyzed two multimillion-dollar capital projects and discovered one had a NPV of $750,000 more than the other, only to be told by management that “only” a $750,000 difference made the two projects “basically equal”!)
IT going green in AustraliaBy Volker Janssen on September 11, 2007, 3:25 amJim Turner's report on funding green IT projects has stirred quite some reaction over here in Australia. Originating from Germany I am always surprised how far back...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: A surefire way to get funding for green IT projectsBy John H on August 8, 2007, 11:49 amEvery year I get croaked by rate increases. And every year my director tells me we have no money for capital work. At least this puts a new arrow in the quiver. Re:...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments