- 4chan hell raisers finding fame brings heat?
- The 10 dumbest mistakes network managers make
- NetApp quits bidding war in face of EMC opposition
- CompuServe closes after 30 years
- Google to launch open-source Chrome OS this year
The IT staff at Morrisville State College, where the first large-scale Draft 802.11n wireless LAN is being designed, says the beta gear exceeds expectations. The school last week plugged in the first 10 production units of Meru Networks access points.
One issue still facing the college, however, is when and how to upgrade the electrical system for the high-throughput devices, 900 of which will eventually be deployed across campus
The New York college, near the state’s rural center, is in the final stage of building a pervasive campuswide WLAN based initially on Meru Networks’ existing 802.11a/b/g access points. Those will start to be replaced this month and next with the newest Meru access points, which have a chipset that supports 11n. The first ten of these were shipped to the college last week.
With 11n, users can expect to see throughput of 100M to 300Mbps, depending on how the access point and client adapter are configured. That compares with 20M to 25Mbps today for 11a and 11g WLANs. In addition, users can expect to see high throughput sustained over longer distances from 11n access points. In tests that began in June, Morrisville network administrators are finding that 11n is delivering on its promise.
| Testing out 802.11n Morrisville State College's client test results with Meru Network's 802.11n wireless LAN gear. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
“Some of the statistics [from the tests] were just unbelievable,” says Jean Boland, vice president of technology services for the college, in Morrisville, N.Y. “[In general,] speeds were five times that of 11g.” Often, they were higher: According to Boland, a 50MB file uploaded from a laptop to a network drive took 3 minutes, 51 seconds with an 11g connection, but 26 seconds with an 11n connection -- nearly nine times faster.
Comments (16)
Information lackingBy Ed Schoffler on September 6, 2007, 9:24 amThe tests failed to compare the 802.11g internal NIC to a 802.11n internal NIC. Why did they stop short with the test? Did the 11g internal test outperform the...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: Why not use built-in Intel 4965AGN adapter from Lenovo?By Anonymous on September 5, 2007, 10:40 pmLet me answer my own question, from above, based on information I just received. They tested with the Atheros chipset, because Intel's 4965AGN doesn't support...
Reply | Read entire comment
Why not use built-in Intel 4965AGN adapter from Lenovo?By Anonymous on September 5, 2007, 12:06 amOne thing that interests me about this article is the performance comparison between a USB 11n adapter, and an 11n adapter that's built into the laptop, which presumably...
Reply | Read entire comment
Even though I find Meru'sBy Anonymous on September 2, 2007, 2:19 pmEven though I find Meru's virtual MAC technology interesting for scaling bandwidth and for minimizing the burden of reassociating/reauthenticating when using strong...
Reply | Read entire comment
These results are "unbelievable"?By Anonymous on August 21, 2007, 6:45 pmI'm not sure how these data are "unbelievable". Morrisville got 1.73 Mbps for the 11g transfer; 15.38 Mbps for 11n with the 2.4 GHz Linksys card; and 50 Mbps on...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments