- BlackBerry Storm vs. the iPhone
- Digg's Kevin Rose: "We have to do better"
- Blogger warns: "Nortel doesn't make it out alive"
- Financial quagmire bringing out the scammers
- Verizon plays with the wrong e-mail addresses
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:Application Performance Solutions | App Performance | Networking Solution | SafeGuard Enterprise Solution Center | SOA | Test your Web Filter | Value of WDS
With Emulex and QLogic last week airing plans for 8Gbps Fibre Channel products, storage-area networks are about to get faster. But customers we interviewed don’t sound too desperate for a speed boost over the 2G and 4Gbps Fibre Channel products they now use.
“While some very I/O-intensive supercomputing needs for 8Gbps Fibre Channel exist, most users’ SAN performance is not eclipsing the 2Gbps Fibre Channel they already own,” says Michael Passe, storage architect for Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. “Users are only moving to 4Gbps Fibre Channel because manufacturers are moving in that direction. The logical place for 8Gbps Fibre Channel is in the host virtualization space, where you have several virtual hosts vying for the same physical host bus adapter.”
Barry Strasnick, CIO for CitiStreet in North Quincy, Mass., says his organization has never come close to hitting constraints with 2Gbps Fibre Channel for financial services processing for the 12 million participants it serves.
“I know it may sound boring, but realistically the major I/O constraint for us is still ‘old-fashioned' disk spindle speed, which is handled by intelligently spreading the load over more spindles,” says Strasnick, who uses QLogic host bus adapters and Brocade switches in his SAN.
The new 8Gbps host bus adapters and switches, which will be available next year, will likely be used initially to link Fibre Channel segments together, enabling consolidation between storage devices and for applications such as backup and video post-production that require higher performance. They could also be used “to aggregate and allow more servers to attach to a given number of storage ports, to support virtual servers that may have aggregated performance needs and for inter-switch links where 4Gbps Fibre Channel is not cutting it yet today,” says Greg Schulz, senior analyst with StorageIO.
But at least some customers say that when they do replace their 2G or 4Gbps Fibre Channel infrastructures, they will likely do so with technologies such as iSCSI and 10Gbps Ethernet.
“I have no plans to go to 8Gbps Fibre Channel for the next three years,” says Ken Walters, senior director of enterprise platforms at the Public Broadcasting System in Alexandria, Va. Walters uses 4Gbps port modules in his McData Intrepid director-level switch to connect to 4Gbps McData or Brocade edge switches.
Partner Content
NetScout is one of the world's premier providers of integrated network and application performance solutions.
www.netscout.com
Know First
Get Proactive — Move from Troubleshooting to Monitoring to Management with nGenius K2's Service Dashboard & Intelligent Early Warning Alarms
Watch the Video
Know Where
Get Rapid Performance Problem Isolation with nGenius Performance Manager and Diagnose Problems up to 70% Faster!
Learn More
Know Why
Get the Details to Validate and Solve your Toughest Performance Issues with nGenius InfiniStream and Sniffer Intelligence Modules
Read the Whitepaper
Comments (1)
FC 8 gbBy Anonymous on May 15, 2008, 8:48 amWe are ready for it. SSD in enclosures will demand the performance of FC-8.
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments